In post 1323, Ankamius wrote:davesaz: Your 167 was literally a post giving reasonings for why people shouldn't be null, but are null anyway. Your 254 was a stronger read than any of that off something that had significantly less thought put into it.
Obviously less thought went into the post where there was less time. How is this even surprising?
Moreso, how is it scummy for me to do it when other people are doing it too?
I find it really hard to believe that it's based solely on the amount of time you play since you basically vote based on your 167s and don't based on your 254s. It actually looks even more fake that you assumed I was only talking about the two specific posts I mentioned since I originally stated that it was applying the concept to your entire ISO.
My available time fluctuates all the time, so variation in post size and depth should and does happen all the time.
I got a little lost on what you meant by voting "the 167s" and not "the 254s". Are you talking about voting weak reads and not strong ones, or voting on deep thought posts and not shallow ones? In either case the Dragonspawn and Garmr votes don't follow the story you're trying to lay out since both were posts which got a lot of time and therefore thought.
