In post 148, Wisdom wrote:Nope, with "recap and no scumhunting" you are essentially accusing me of IIOA. None of these posts were IIOA, so try again
What? Now you are arguing with your self lololol.
In post 148, Wisdom wrote:Nope, with "recap and no scumhunting" you are essentially accusing me of IIOA. None of these posts were IIOA, so try again
In post 153, Wisdom wrote:ill give you one last chance.
There are people who have over 20 games with me and still can't meta me. You can't meta me off a single game, especially given that game was multiball and I was genuinely scumhunting for other factions. If anything, if my play this game reminds you of that game, you should be taking it as a sign I am town.
But even without any meta, it's quite evident I am town. All these posts you listed, in all of them I am scumhunting, trying to make people see their mistakes and either fix them or respond in ways that could be telling. You are just disliking the way I am doing it.
In post 154, Wisdom wrote:meanwhile I don't like PA so far
In post 92, shaddowez wrote:In post 86, Elbirn wrote:So confidence is a null tell, but the way it is shown can be scummy? I.e. it's my actions? If yes, what have I done and why is it scummy?
Yeah, that's probably a good way to put it.
In posts 11 and 20 you're pushing for people to sheep you, out of just an RVS vote. There's one posts worth of information to go on, which is barely enough to even make a viable argument out of, let alone enough to convince other people to vote on without some heavy influencing. The attitude that comes across in 27 is similar, though not quite as pushy. It seems like an attempt to establish an air of leadership and have people follow you without needing proof. Additionally, since it was right out of RVS, if kyndy does get lynched and flip town you have the fallback of "I didn't have a strong argument, you all decided to follow me blindly".
In post 93, Wisdom wrote:Elbirn you look different than last game. You had reasonable reads there, and you sticked to them despite what others said (for example you insisted I am town). I like neither your shallow tunnel on kyndy nor the way you stopped pushing her just because I didn't agree with you.
In post 95, Vedith wrote:
In post 82, Elbirn wrote:But none of that matters because kyndy is town apparently
I don't understand this comment. Is this town apparently from your opinion? I've never been the fan of early suggestions of people being 'town'. I know that's how most people are on here, I just think it's an excuse for someone to work from that if they are scum.
In post 162, Elbirn wrote:
I don't get how your back and forth with gray concludes with you switching your vote off of him, particularly considering post 151.
In post 161, Elbirn wrote:If you thought my push was such crap then why did you vote her with me and say nothing of my push at the time?
In post 161, Elbirn wrote:Of course my reads after 100+ pages of a large game were stronger than my reads in 3-4 pages of a micro.
In post 162, Elbirn wrote:
I don't get how your back and forth with gray concludes with you switching your vote off of him, particularly considering post 151.
In post 163, kyndy101 wrote:I also don't like all of wisdom's empty threats (ie "die", "last chance") and then not even voting Grey.
In post 165, Wisdom wrote:In post 161, Elbirn wrote:If you thought my push was such crap then why did you vote her with me and say nothing of my push at the time?
I voted her for a single thing she did that I didn't like. You pushed her for things that weren't scummy and kept tunneling even after she claimed.
In post 166, Wisdom wrote:In post 161, Elbirn wrote:Of course my reads after 100+ pages of a large game were stronger than my reads in 3-4 pages of a micro.
That's irrelevant. The point is that other people didn't affect your reads there. While here, I say she is town, you immediately accept it and unvote.
In post 171, Wisdom wrote:You continued, then stopped after I insisted she's town