In post 174, Klick wrote:Firebringer; not the hero we deserve, but the hero we need.
If my momma could see me now. She would be so proud, that I was leading a forum game to lynch the evil players.
YOU PROUD NOW MOM!
In post 174, Klick wrote:Firebringer; not the hero we deserve, but the hero we need.
In post 162, Firebringer wrote:Idiot Savant, how was your day?
Where do you see yourself in five years?
What do you consider your greatest strength and weakness?
If you had one sentence to describe yourself, what would you say?
Is this engaging good?
In post 163, mykonian wrote:but bella
you are scum.
would hardly be a fun conversation, it's like a rabbit talking about the weather with a fox :/
In post 178, Firebringer wrote:Idiot Savant-Null leaning scum
Klick-Unknown, don’t want to lynch
DeasVail-Null leaning scum
Jazzmyn-Townish vibe
shaddowez-Null to scum lean
hayatoBL-Town Possibly
Vedith-Null to scum lean
MarioManiac4-Town Possibly
gameplay506-Null going to leave him alone today
mykonian-Bad Town
Firebringer-God Leader of Town
In post 179, Professor Bozo wrote:Ace, lovely. Sitting on that read while not developing interactions outside other slots is icky. Also, totally a rabbit.
In post 92, Wanderer-nl wrote:
And is answered, but I don't like it. I don't agree btw his stance changed (don't remember who said that) he just seems very eager to hammer ika no matter his allignment. Which imo is antitown. And then he tries to look protown by waiting for a claim just in case they're the seer and I don't know how to feel about that yet. I mean, rolefishing comes to mind and coaching comes to mind, but maybe I'm just looking into this too muchbecause I don't really see Mario be this obvious so early.
In post 162, Firebringer wrote:Idiot Savant, how was your day?
Where do you see yourself in five years?
What do you consider your greatest strength and weakness?
If you had one sentence to describe yourself, what would you say?
is this engaging good?
In post 169, Vedith wrote:To be honest, I haven't been active, and 'trying to look active' with 6 posts?! I don't understand where you get that from. Reading through your comments, all I see is you putting a vote on Gameplay as a distancing vote. When there is a chance that it can build on him you change your mind.
In post 188, shaddowez wrote:Number of posts has nothing to do with activity, it's based on content. If you have 100 posts of "Hi" that's less than one good post with reads and questions. So yes, it looks like you're trying to be active in your posts by posing questions and comments that don't mean anything.
In post 191, gameplay506 wrote:Ugh I just cant get my head in the game sorry
Mod please replace me
Sorry all :#
In post 194, Wanderer-nl wrote:I'm back and I read the last pages again. Something about Savant that pings me. I know Bella is good as scum, we were scum together once, and the stuff people are townreading Savant for are things I think Bella could easily fake. I'll iso Savant tomorrow, I'm too tired to do much now, and I'll also respond to Hayato's 185.
In post 144, Professor Bozo wrote:@ika, you are meant to be in this hydra, stop solo posting
@ wanderer, his first vote on us is (to me rvs), but he doesn't answer my questions about it. He wants us hammered by MM in 67. However, by 69 you and MM are scum, but his vote is on us. His next post is a vote for FB (first real mention of the slot) but MM is still scum. Suddenly, the reads coalesce in 102, but we get this gem 'Would be happy with a lynch on any,firebringer probably the easiest.'
Bolding mine, but town aren't looking for an 'easy' lynch. He then jokes about tunneling later.
I think he's after easy lynches and he's not explaining the progression of his reads.
VOTE: myk
Also, @everyone, please throw comments and questions at us, I feel like we're being avoided.
@fb, links to a scum game?
In post 185, hayatoBL wrote:I know I should have done this years ago. But I was toolazydistracted to turn my thoughts into a post. So sorry. Try your best to make me less worry of you.
ISO-ing you:
I found another of those useless question. I mean if you had given a bit of thought, it's clear why Mario voted Klick over you. You may argue that it is a post-RVS question and wouldn't be as insightful, yet I don't see where you would go with this question and therefore, is more likely asked just for the sake of posting a question.
In post 92, Wanderer-nl wrote:
And is answered, but I don't like it. I don't agree btw his stance changed (don't remember who said that) he just seems very eager to hammer ika no matter his allignment. Which imo is antitown. And then he tries to look protown by waiting for a claim just in case they're the seer and I don't know how to feel about that yet. I mean, rolefishing comes to mind and coaching comes to mind, but maybe I'm just looking into this too muchbecause I don't really see Mario be this obvious so early.
The bolded suggests that in the end you null/town read him, but while coming to that you suggested scum-reads on him(rolefishing, coaching, trying to look protown, seem eager to hammer). And to make matter worse, no one was asking about your reads on mario. So you voluntarily explaining scum-reads which you no longer believe in feels like either a) an attempt to let other push that wagon or b) to seem useful by providing content.
While we're at it, one of the reason I town-read Deas was because he claimed to have reads which he chose not to reveal.
It's quite reasonable to have three scum-reads at this particular juncture, considering we're at D1 and some players aren't really playing.
Do you expect to have enough scum-reads at this point?
Which makes this commentary fake to me. Feels like you're trying to say 'Even if I have only three scum-reads which would probably suggest I'm scum, I'm aware that it's not enough but claim to have three scum-reads anyway, so I'm not scum'.
VOTE: Wanderer[/vote ]
I disagree with the Savant wagon and good with the Vedith wagon, unless Klick or someone else can counter my counter argument.
Fair warning: Gameplay and Jazz can be good policy lynches in case we can't agree on one lynch, so you might need to up your effort. Will lynch gameplay rather than jazz.
FireBringer's play is different from the previous one. But a good kind of different. Different could suggest scum, but could probably means he is improving his play. Not willing to lynch him today.
In post 186, hayatoBL wrote:I also thought some of your reads too naive, Wanderer. you said Klick is Town and gameplay is too sloppy(or maybe careless was the word?) to be scum.
In post 178, Firebringer wrote:Idiot Savant-Null leaning scum
Klick-Unknown, don’t want to lynch
DeasVail-Null leaning scum
Jazzmyn-Townish vibe
shaddowez-Null to scum lean
hayatoBL-Town Possibly
Vedith-Null to scum lean
MarioManiac4-Town Possibly
gameplay506-Null going to leave him alone today
mykonian-Bad Town
Firebringer-God Leader of Town