Oh I don't think I said this. But if asked I would also not tell anyone what I would do as scum if I thought it would give scum ideas. Not saying what you'd do is not scummy at all.
And if you're saying scum wouldn't want to tell you what they would do as scum cause then town would know their intentions, don't be ridiculous. Scum lie. Case closed
I am saying that it is much harder to lie about that. It means trying to figure out how another player would read a town player thinking about how scum would behave. That shit is complicated and uncomfortable for scum to do unless they are some kind of pathological type. I believe its a question any scum player would want to avoid and has a nice potential for catching a slip.
I agree, but as town I not about to let scum know what I believe is optimal game play. If you want to use that for a case, that's your play. It's just not something I'll include in my cases.
Well I don't know how you read it specifically, but I do know that you missed this question as you haven't answered it: Why exactly does it make any difference which head posted what if what they posted is scummy?
Well that's easy. Because I don't know the other person at all. I've had games with FB and when he does certain stuff it's strange for him.
Like his post of me not answering what I would do as scum, is something that town FB wouldn't do imo. His other head, might do that, I have no idea.
In post 10, lane0168 wrote:Hello all! First things first. Anyone who quick hammers will be getting my vote and it will remain there, unmoved, until you are dead. Just do everyone knows.
VOTE: hellbringer
In post 18, Vedith wrote:Btw I'm with Lane on the quick hammer... Although no Sal this game!
@Lane - I want to answer your question. It's an offsite player (approved to play) but I forget their name. Should still be on the sign ups thread.
In post 47, HellBringer wrote:I say we organize who bids on what items and how much, we can do this better than last iteration of game.
Town put bids as high as 50 but not higher, preferably stick to one item.
If scum want to win, they will have to bid 51 and then we can win all items from then on.
Deja vu
Last time scum spent 100 on the first night and still won (Given that it was me that lost us it).
This idea already had the holes poked into it.
In post 89, HellBringer wrote:If I have looked so scummy why don't you point out what I have said that could come from a scum perspective and most importantly "Why"
I saw your post 83 as a hard dodge. And I bereave the reason is because you are scum and did not want to reveal this side of your thinking. You could ask me right now what I would do as scum and I would have no problem saying quite a bit. This is because I am constantly thinking of what scum may do so I can counter it and this is something I do not believe you are doing at all because your mafia.
No no no that's not how this works
If you asked me what scum was going to do and why I would stall out too because of wifom and poor setup cracking skills
You're scumreading someone because they can't scumhunt the same way you do
In post 103, HellBringer wrote:If town can not win with days that long I will eat my hat. That is such a massive amount of time to coordinate and share reads I am shocked scum ever wins.
Off topic but imo it causes a lot of over-discussion
In post 133, HellBringer wrote:I would like to hear some thoughts on the less active people here:
Flubbernugget, OrcKnight and Tates, thoughts so far?
Reads?
How was your day?
My activity and reading comprehension is going to suck
I was originally going to vote for vedith but the scum reads comes down to too much theory posting and the same thing can be said of Hellbringer, and scum reading one slot while "feeling" the other as town doesn't sit right
