In post 24, The Bulge wrote:I'm getting freaky vibes from Luna too, ugh she's just so like unnatural!
Cool to know that you feel i'm unnatural, now explain why i'm scum.
In post 24, The Bulge wrote:I'm getting freaky vibes from Luna too, ugh she's just so like unnatural!
In post 26, Vedith wrote:Luna - Explain your reason in 14 further please.
In post 27, Peptobislawl wrote:but I don't like that vote at all.
In post 31, Vedith wrote:Yeah but your theory of the 1st person would be town and the 2nd person scum is not serious and is pointless.
In post 33, Vedith wrote:I think it's as easy as one another.
Scum want to make a reason to vote a town. If a chance comes up great, but I can see it swinging either way.
In post 24, The Bulge wrote:V! O! T! E! Lynch some scum and vote with me! \o/
VOTE: Luna Fox
I'm totally feeling you Davsto gurlfrand, 19 like totally hits the nail on the head. I'm getting freaky vibes from Luna too, ugh she's just so like unnatural!
In post 38, Vedith wrote:Can we all stop horsing around.
So, where's Ene and Garmr.
Also, can 27 have any indication from NS or Bulge? Or is it a we know what we need to know topic?
In post 40, Tetaes wrote:Also, @Luna. Why do you think that scum would do such a risky move? Why would, in your opinion, anyone that forms a wagon in RVS is likely to be scum.
To me it's more of a way to push the game, like what you did.
Also, saying that it's 'opportunism' doesn't cut it. Forming wagons in RVS isn't really a scumtell for me.
In post 43, Tetaes wrote:@Luna I agree with you. I just needed reasons and no, I don't think seriously voting someone on page 1 is a legit scumtell.
In post 44, Vedith wrote:as my vote is intended there anyway
In post 46, Luna Fox wrote:In post 44, Vedith wrote:as my vote is intended there anyway
^
Possibly scum excuse here, scum have more tendency to have static reads over dynamic ones. Feels like one of those "Oh hey look i have been scumreading her so this is obviously not clashing with any reads i have had"
In post 45, Davsto wrote:In post 43, Tetaes wrote:@Luna I agree with you. I just needed reasons and no, I don't think seriously voting someone on page 1 is a legit scumtell.
Voting seriously early? That's fine. Voting seriously because someone parroted a stupid joke? Now that is scummy.