Micro 532: Anything UPick! (Day1)

Luna Fox · Post Post #25 (ISO) » Mon Sep 28, 2015 6:44 am

In post 24, The Bulge wrote:I'm getting freaky vibes from Luna too, ugh she's just so like unnatural!

Cool to know that you feel i'm unnatural, now explain why i'm scum.

Vedith · Post Post #26 (ISO) » Mon Sep 28, 2015 6:53 am

I'm late!

VOTE: Ene
UNVOTE: Ene
That's my RVS take it as you like.

My vote would be going on Luna right now if she didn't have 3 (with 2 people not posted yet?)
Luna - Explain your reason in 14 further please.

Peptobislawl · Post Post #27 (ISO) » Mon Sep 28, 2015 6:55 am

Wait, Luna's vote was serious? I wont vote because that'd be too close to Lynch too soon, but I don't like that vote at all.

Also, do we maybe have 2 post restrictions? Bulge getting hype about everything and notscience failing to care about anything

Luna Fox · Post Post #28 (ISO) » Mon Sep 28, 2015 6:59 am

In post 26, Vedith wrote:Luna - Explain your reason in 14 further please.

I already said.
Opportunism.
If we don't treat RVS seriously then RVS is pointless.

Luna Fox · Post Post #29 (ISO) » Mon Sep 28, 2015 7:09 am

In post 27, Peptobislawl wrote:but I don't like that vote at all.

Why?

Luna Fox · Post Post #30 (ISO) » Mon Sep 28, 2015 7:10 am

Because i said it was serious?
What if i had said it was a joke?
Would bulge have felt threatened by it?
Obviously everyone's reacting to the vote for it being serious
This is effectively a decent end to RVS.
I'd argue that my vote has achievemed more than all those "joke" votes posted during RVS

Vedith · Post Post #31 (ISO) » Mon Sep 28, 2015 7:10 am

Yeah but your theory of the 1st person would be town and the 2nd person scum is not serious and is pointless.

Luna Fox · Post Post #32 (ISO) » Mon Sep 28, 2015 7:12 am

In post 31, Vedith wrote:Yeah but your theory of the 1st person would be town and the 2nd person scum is not serious and is pointless.

How do you know?
Do you disagree that it's more likely for town or scum to follow a vote onto someone for silly reasons?
I'd argue otherwise.

Vedith · Post Post #33 (ISO) » Mon Sep 28, 2015 7:13 am

I think it's as easy as one another.
Scum want to make a reason to vote a town. If a chance comes up great, but I can see it swinging either way.

Luna Fox · Post Post #34 (ISO) » Mon Sep 28, 2015 7:15 am

In post 33, Vedith wrote:I think it's as easy as one another.
Scum want to make a reason to vote a town. If a chance comes up great, but I can see it swinging either way.

I'd think voting someone for sheeping a reason to vote someone is something scum are more likely to do during RVS, of course, they might be town, but it's a chance that's worth enough of a vote for a page 1 read.

Davsto · Post Post #35 (ISO) » Mon Sep 28, 2015 7:16 am

In post 24, The Bulge wrote:V! O! T! E! Lynch some scum and vote with me! \o/
VOTE: Luna Fox

I'm totally feeling you Davsto gurlfrand, 19 like totally hits the nail on the head. I'm getting freaky vibes from Luna too, ugh she's just so like unnatural!

okay I see you like partying so I'ma gonna give you some flags~~

Spoiler: flaaaggg

Bins · Post Post #36 (ISO) » Mon Sep 28, 2015 8:16 am

Votecount 1.1

(1) Davsto

— Peptobislawl
(0) notscience —

(3) Luna Fox

— Tetaes, Davsto, The Bulge
(0) Vedith —
(0) Peptobislawl —
(0) Tetaes —

(2) The Bulge

— Luna Fox, notscience
(0) Ene —
(0) Garmr —

With 9 alive, it's 5 to lynch.

Not Voting — Vedith, Ene, Garmr

Bins · Post Post #37 (ISO) » Mon Sep 28, 2015 8:16 am

In post 10, Davsto wrote:
In post 4, Bins wrote:
This is a friendly reminder not to kill me if this game is super swingy (it is).
oh man

this game is just gonna be bananas.

also, why Comic Sans ;-;

Comic Sans is too strong.

Vedith · Post Post #38 (ISO) » Mon Sep 28, 2015 11:17 am

Can we all stop horsing around.
So, where's Ene and Garmr.

Also, can 27 have any indication from NS or Bulge? Or is it a we know what we need to know topic?

Peptobislawl · Post Post #39 (ISO) » Mon Sep 28, 2015 12:06 pm

In post 38, Vedith wrote:Can we all stop horsing around.
So, where's Ene and Garmr.

Also, can 27 have any indication from NS or Bulge? Or is it a we know what we need to know topic?

He's refering to the post restriction you two may have.

Tetaes · Post Post #40 (ISO) » Mon Sep 28, 2015 2:31 pm

Catching up here, I get why people are fosing Luna but I'm not feeling the vibe everyone is feeling.
Scum or not, at least she effectively pushed the game out of RVS.

Also, @Luna. Why do you think that scum would do such a risky move? Why would, in your opinion, anyone that forms a wagon in RVS is likely to be scum.
To me it's more of a way to push the game, like what you did.
Also, saying that it's 'opportunism' doesn't cut it. Forming wagons in RVS isn't really a scumtell for me.

Luna Fox · Post Post #41 (ISO) » Mon Sep 28, 2015 2:59 pm

In post 40, Tetaes wrote:Also, @Luna. Why do you think that scum would do such a risky move? Why would, in your opinion, anyone that forms a wagon in RVS is likely to be scum.
To me it's more of a way to push the game, like what you did.
Also, saying that it's 'opportunism' doesn't cut it. Forming wagons in RVS isn't really a scumtell for me.

It's not about the wagon per se, it's RVSing for the exact same reason on the exact same person, it's not a risky move because scum will just say "Bah that was just RVS you're reading too much into it", which is why im saying that i always take RVS seriously, otherwise RVS is pointless. When you sheep someone onto a wagon for their exact same reason it counts as opportunism imo, as i said tho, it's not that strong of a read that Bulge is like 100% scum and i'll push him with the holy fire of justice.
It's enough of a Page 1 read to push for more info tho, specially with the OMGUS reaction taken.
Or do you think that voting seriously onto someone at page 1 is a legit reason to be scumread?

Ene · Post Post #42 (ISO) » Tue Sep 29, 2015 12:47 am

Hello everyone!

Tetaes · Post Post #43 (ISO) » Tue Sep 29, 2015 1:30 am

Hiii! Ene!

@Luna I agree with you. I just needed reasons and no, I don't think seriously voting someone on page 1 is a legit scumtell.

Let me retract my rvs because I don't think it's Luna.
UNVOTE:

Vedith · Post Post #44 (ISO) » Tue Sep 29, 2015 4:58 am

In that case, as my vote is intended there anyway,

VOTE: Luna

Davsto · Post Post #45 (ISO) » Tue Sep 29, 2015 5:12 am

In post 43, Tetaes wrote:@Luna I agree with you. I just needed reasons and no, I don't think seriously voting someone on page 1 is a legit scumtell.

Voting seriously early? That's fine. Voting seriously because someone parroted a stupid joke? Now that is scummy.

Luna Fox · Post Post #46 (ISO) » Tue Sep 29, 2015 5:12 am

In post 44, Vedith wrote:as my vote is intended there anyway

^
Possibly scum excuse here, scum have more tendency to have static reads over dynamic ones. Feels like one of those "Oh hey look i have been scumreading her so this is obviously not clashing with any reads i have had"

Davsto · Post Post #47 (ISO) » Tue Sep 29, 2015 5:14 am

In post 46, Luna Fox wrote:
In post 44, Vedith wrote:as my vote is intended there anyway

^
Possibly scum excuse here, scum have more tendency to have static reads over dynamic ones. Feels like one of those "Oh hey look i have been scumreading her so this is obviously not clashing with any reads i have had"

um

no

what it was is he didn't want to vote to put you at L-1, but since someone removed their vote he put it on because he was no longer putting it at L-1. That's not scummy. That's sensibility.

Vedith · Post Post #48 (ISO) » Tue Sep 29, 2015 5:15 am

As above ^

Luna Fox · Post Post #49 (ISO) » Tue Sep 29, 2015 5:17 am

In post 45, Davsto wrote:
In post 43, Tetaes wrote:@Luna I agree with you. I just needed reasons and no, I don't think seriously voting someone on page 1 is a legit scumtell.

Voting seriously early? That's fine. Voting seriously because someone parroted a stupid joke? Now that is scummy.

>Stupid Joke
Why do you think that "Stupid Joke" was their reasons for voting?
People in RVS have only the information given by their Role PM, and they will act in instinct as such, the act of Parroting was made with scum motivation due to a player they know to be town. I can seriously believe that you would think that you can joke throughout RVS and get any sort of information when everyone will just say "Oh but it was just a joke why are you taking it seriously"

Meh, at this point im just repeating myself, my argument has been made, i am scumhunting, you are just voting playstyles you dont like.

P-Edit: That was directed at Davsto