Mini 1715 - Z - Game over!

Thor665 · Post Post #775 (ISO) » Sat Oct 03, 2015 3:58 pm

Yeah, I'm just not obligating a lynch that has ever been - a claimed PR or one of the copped/jk targets.
Not until the jailkeep is dead, that is.

zakk · Post Post #776 (ISO) » Sat Oct 03, 2015 10:35 pm

EXPERIMENT NOTES 3.1

SUBJECTS ASSERTING AGGRESSIVE ACTIVITY:

gummmybear [1] - pistachi0n
KarmicGuide [1] - Gimlear
Bellaphant [0]
davesaz [0]
eventi [0]
Garmr [0]
Gimlear [0]
Nachomamma8 [0]
pistachi0n [0]
Radja [0]
Thor665 [0]

SUBJECTS DISPLAYING PASSIVE TENDENCY:

Bellaphant, davesaz, eventi, Garmr, gummmybear, KarmicGuide, Nachomamma8, Radja, Thor665

Nachomamma8 · Post Post #777 (ISO) » Sun Oct 04, 2015 4:36 am

In post 772, Garmr wrote:That's pretty bad reasoning pista if nacho is really a doctor they could easily shot him yesterday and have free range over who to kill tonight. The only way I don't see them shooting nacho (if he is legit) is the the fact that David jailed them.

This is correct reasoning.

In post 773, Thor665 wrote:With you protecting the Jailkeep.
Unless we hear something interesting about our rolecop's power, and then we can debate an alternate plan.

Did you see the optimal plan I just laid out?

Nachomamma8 · Post Post #778 (ISO) » Sun Oct 04, 2015 4:37 am

If people want to lynch non-Karmic I'm open to that because I could see Gummy being weird but it's important people actually understand what I just did on the last page and not ignore it completely.

Garmr · Post Post #779 (ISO) » Sun Oct 04, 2015 4:41 am

if we do a lynch the only one who should be lynched is karmic. But i think no lynches till everyone is confirmed

Thor665 · Post Post #780 (ISO) » Sun Oct 04, 2015 4:41 am

In post 777, Nachomamma8 wrote:Did you see the optimal plan I just laid out?

Does it matter until we hear back from Pistach?
Mine is simpler and has less headaches without making presumptions about his power.

Nachomamma8 · Post Post #781 (ISO) » Sun Oct 04, 2015 4:44 am

You makes the same presumptions about her power that I do; if her power is "detects active abilities", the cop + rolecop investigation isn't actually a 100% clear.

Thor665 · Post Post #782 (ISO) » Sun Oct 04, 2015 4:50 am

Yes, but I indicated that in my discussion, and it also only increases the value of you being on the Jailkeeper if he does clarify that is how his power works.

Nachomamma8 · Post Post #783 (ISO) » Sun Oct 04, 2015 4:54 am

In post 782, Thor665 wrote:Yes, but I indicated that in my discussion, and it also only increases the value of you being on the Jailkeeper if he does clarify that is how his power works.

How so?

Thor665 · Post Post #784 (ISO) » Sun Oct 04, 2015 6:47 am

Because the less able the rolecop is to spot a Godfather the more valuable the JKer becomes.

Nachomamma8 · Post Post #785 (ISO) » Sun Oct 04, 2015 6:58 am

Oh sorry, a bit slow and hungover at the moment. I'm happy to protect Dave if Pistach clarifies that's how her power works.

If she does work like a normal rolecop though, I don't see why we can't play optimally.

Thor665 · Post Post #786 (ISO) » Sun Oct 04, 2015 7:04 am

If she works like a normal rolecop I'm still pretty sure my method is the best.

pistachi0n · Post Post #787 (ISO) » Sun Oct 04, 2015 9:14 am

Zakk says I can detect godfathers.

Gimlear · Post Post #788 (ISO) » Sun Oct 04, 2015 2:06 pm

There are valid reasons for both lynching Karmic and for a no lynch. It's just matter of what does everyone else want to do because those are our 2 main options for today.

eventi · Post Post #789 (ISO) » Sun Oct 04, 2015 10:04 pm

I vote lynch
VOTE: KarmicGuide

Thor665 · Post Post #790 (ISO) » Mon Oct 05, 2015 2:04 am

In post 787, pistachi0n wrote:Zakk says I can detect godfathers.

What sort of result would you get on one?

gummmybear · Post Post #791 (ISO) » Mon Oct 05, 2015 4:14 am

We seem to have the game rather solved. I'd rather go with lynching, and if it has to be me, I'll go. Haven't been playing well at all and if it's better to have a PR clear someone else, I'll go for it.

Pistach, if you look at my ISO you know why I voted SilverWolf - her nonsense case on me and refusing to acknowledge it or reply to me in any way.

Garmr · Post Post #792 (ISO) » Mon Oct 05, 2015 4:35 am

Silvers probably crying from the grave at the amount of people calling her a boy lol

.

Radja · Post Post #793 (ISO) » Mon Oct 05, 2015 5:39 am

Karmic has been silent, so I think this game will be over when we Lynch him.

davesaz · Post Post #794 (ISO) » Mon Oct 05, 2015 6:54 am

I think lynch is the right move, and KarmicGuide is the right target.
It seems unlikely that he'd be scum's kill target, and we have no evidence of another way that scum could have failed to kill, unless they didn't believe Nacho is a doc.
No-killing for the wifom seems so subpar as a scum move that I can't imagine that being the strategy. There were too many good moves to have that be the choice.

Thor665 · Post Post #795 (ISO) » Mon Oct 05, 2015 7:04 am

I will admit that the only player I see a benefit to in the no kill is theory Nacho scum - but, firstly, he doesn't really vibe as scum, and secondly, he's still boned even if he wants to try to ride that one to the finish line.

pistachi0n · Post Post #796 (ISO) » Mon Oct 05, 2015 7:10 am

In post 790, Thor665 wrote:
In post 787, pistachi0n wrote:Zakk says I can detect godfathers.

What sort of result would you get on one?

I assume it would be godfather but I sent another message to be sure.

VOTE: karmic

Thor665 · Post Post #797 (ISO) » Mon Oct 05, 2015 7:22 am

So to clarify - you do *not* get results about their abilities, you *do* get results about their role name, with the caveat that VT and Goon are both identified as vanilla - yes/no?

pistachi0n · Post Post #798 (ISO) » Mon Oct 05, 2015 8:55 am

Yes. I mean, I assume. He hasn't replied to my question asking what a godfather would show up as.

Thor665 · Post Post #799 (ISO) » Mon Oct 05, 2015 9:05 am

Okay, when he does if you could update me, that would be excellent.