Alright guys, do EVERYONE a favor and when you quote someone, please just quote the relevant part of the post. Like this.
Garmr wrote:
Can i ask a question why go for the I'm shit and so bad that I'm a easy mislynch so everyone voting me is scum approach instead of actual competent hunting. I know you're a oldie and might be a little rusty but why go for this approach?
I'm absolutely not. How the hell did you get "I'm so shit, I'm and easy mislynch" from "I have a wagon on me every game, time to find out which one is scum"?
Archmage wrote:
Won't votes that I'm not confident in muddy the waters for VCA? It's not going to be reflective of my true perspective if it's a vote I was arbitrarily pressured into making for VCA, is it?
Who could be confident at this stage? And yet pretty much everyone else is voting. It makes it much easier for people to track your primary suspect over time. Right now all you've contributed is calling something I did "weird" and defend not liking to throw down early votes. Who do you think is MOST LIKELY to be scum right now, and why?
Take a look, for example, at Garmr's vote. It's bad, but at least it helps people read him and learn his alignment. If you're town, you want us to learn your alignment. If you're scum, you absolutely don't. So which role does your play benefit more? You guessed it! Scum! If you're scum go ahead and continue to not vote as we only really want town votes anyway, makes it easier to lynch scum day 1.
Fire definitely lost his townread, by nature of having made an early move then slinking back to the shadows. The rest of his subsequent posts haven't really had much in the way of content to them, except a meta IIoA, and completely lack a vote after an unvote. Why the sudden shift from aggressive voter to not having anything?
I'd really like Diego to come in and post some content.