Mini 1733: Jurassic Monkey - game over

3dicerolling · Post Post #150 (ISO) » Mon Oct 26, 2015 12:36 pm

In post 146, The Archmage Ludicrous wrote:

Syndesis:
Seems to be tunnelling Diego a bit. I'd have to throw a light town-reading, nothing really suspicious that I saw.

Townslip or nah?

Syndesis · Post Post #151 (ISO) » Mon Oct 26, 2015 12:42 pm

In post 146, The Archmage Ludicrous wrote:
Syndesis:
Seems to be tunnelling Diego a bit. I'd have to throw a light town-reading, nothing really suspicious that I saw.

lol hahah-

In post 148, Garmr wrote:archmage you know syn is innocent child

dammit you beat me-

In post 150, 3dicerolling wrote:
In post 146, The Archmage Ludicrous wrote:

Syndesis:
Seems to be tunnelling Diego a bit. I'd have to throw a light town-reading, nothing really suspicious that I saw.

Townslip or nah?

>:|

You bring up a good point. I doubt mafia would

truly

be unaware of my conftownness (having, presumably, pregame chat?) but this is an easy to fake "slip", so I'd so no.

Syndesis · Post Post #152 (ISO) » Mon Oct 26, 2015 12:43 pm

In post 151, Syndesis wrote:You bring up a good point. I doubt mafia would
truly
be unaware of my conftownness (having, presumably, pregame chat?) but this is an easy to fake "slip", so I'd say no.

EBWOP. (I even spotted the typo in the second after I hit submit >__>)

All Alone · Post Post #153 (ISO) » Mon Oct 26, 2015 12:49 pm

Archmage's last post was a gigantic wall of IIoA, and I really have a hard time believing a townie would think that was useful.

Pistachi0n is also likely scum. She's very noticeably more reactive as scum and more proactive as town, and I've seen no proactive out of her.

Syndesis · Post Post #154 (ISO) » Mon Oct 26, 2015 12:53 pm

In post 153, All Alone wrote:Archmage's last post was a gigantic wall of IIoA, and I really have a hard time believing a townie would think that was useful.

Pistachi0n is also likely scum. She's very noticeably more reactive as scum and more proactive as town, and I've seen no proactive out of her.

Hi AA :D Nice to play with you again!

I do agree that it is mostly IIoA (Information Instead of Analysis), but do you think that IIoA is a scumtell in this instance?

3dicerolling · Post Post #155 (ISO) » Mon Oct 26, 2015 1:15 pm

@Syndesis - It's been awhile since I've played on here. Do mafia get pregame chat?

Garmr · Post Post #156 (ISO) » Mon Oct 26, 2015 1:16 pm

Pista does nothing as town I know first hand how much a easy mislynch she is

Syndesis · Post Post #157 (ISO) » Mon Oct 26, 2015 1:22 pm

In post 155, 3dicerolling wrote:@Syndesis - It's been awhile since I've played on here. Do mafia get pregame chat?

...that's a good question. I assumed so but that assumption is mostly based on RtR and I've never really payed attention to it in the games I watch.

@Mod(s): Do mafia get to speak pregame?

pistachi0n · Post Post #158 (ISO) » Mon Oct 26, 2015 2:37 pm

In post 87, ICEninja wrote:Is your vote on Garmr legit or remnants of RVS?

Remnants of RVS.

pistachi0n · Post Post #159 (ISO) » Mon Oct 26, 2015 2:40 pm

In post 47, 3dicerolling wrote:I'm not sure I like the precedence of the unvote.

What do you mean by this?

In post 150, 3dicerolling wrote:
In post 146, The Archmage Ludicrous wrote:

Syndesis:
Seems to be tunnelling Diego a bit. I'd have to throw a light town-reading, nothing really suspicious that I saw.

Townslip or nah?

Or they literally didn't read the rules.

pistachi0n · Post Post #160 (ISO) » Mon Oct 26, 2015 2:41 pm

Scumread on Mario, he's playing lazily.

VOTE: MarioManiac

Syndesis · Post Post #161 (ISO) » Mon Oct 26, 2015 2:44 pm

@

pistachi0n

:

In post 68, 3dicerolling wrote:
In post 60, Syndesis wrote:
In post 47, 3dicerolling wrote:I'm not sure I like the precedence of the unvote.

"Precedence of the unvote"? Could you clarify that?

Well, Firebringer unvoted right after Iceninja called out a town read on him, which is IMO kind of scummy.

Firebringer · Post Post #162 (ISO) » Mon Oct 26, 2015 2:57 pm

VOTE: Archmage
I agree with All Alone. Burn the mage!

Garmr · Post Post #163 (ISO) » Mon Oct 26, 2015 3:20 pm

Fire people don't understand our bond after numerous games together

Firebringer · Post Post #164 (ISO) » Mon Oct 26, 2015 3:22 pm

In post 163, Garmr wrote:Fire people don't understand our bond after numerous games together

I don't even understand our bond. And I am a person in the bond.

Its a strange thing.

Garmr · Post Post #165 (ISO) » Mon Oct 26, 2015 3:29 pm

Its a very close and intimate bond

ICEninja · Post Post #166 (ISO) » Mon Oct 26, 2015 4:44 pm

Garmr wrote:
His accusing me of having one post of content and doing nothing which is flat out wrong and I'm offended

I accused you of having one post of content

that doesn't DIRECTLY pertain to me or my vote on you

. I also believe it is accurate. If you feel it is inaccurate feel free to ISO yourself and demonstrate where you have contributed content that isn't fluff or doesn't involve me in any way shape or form. Prove me wrong and I will concede the point.

3dice wrote:
The only thing I wanted clipped out of 127 was the "oops" thing. Sometimes when I try to clip quotes I screw up, so I usually tend to not, but I can start for this game.

Using the preview function makes it quite easy to see if you messed up any quote clipping.

Archmage seems to spend a LOT of effort on 146, but the only actual read he seems to have is on Garmr. I like the read on Garmr, but that's pretty much all I like about the post. Recaps don't help much, and I agree with everyone who attacks him for IIoA. Since I know Archmage is going to ask, this stands for

Information Instead of Analysis

, and is a tactic frequently used by scum to act as if they are taking a stance without actually taking a stance. Recap, give information, but commit to nothing.

Garmr continues to fluffpost. Fire continues to fluffpost.

Pistachi0n pops in with a vote for "lazy play". What the hell does that even mean? Please come back and explain your vote with something that indicates alignment.

Syndesis · Post Post #167 (ISO) » Mon Oct 26, 2015 5:11 pm

In post 162, Firebringer wrote:VOTE: Archmage
I agree with All Alone. Burn the mage!

You agree that Archmage is IIoAing, correct? Same question to you, then. Do you believe that this is a scumtell in this instance? Of what strength?

Firebringer · Post Post #168 (ISO) » Mon Oct 26, 2015 5:13 pm

In post 167, Syndesis wrote:
You agree that Archmage is IIoAing, correct? Same question to you, then. Do you believe that this is a scumtell in this instance? Of what strength?

It can be a scum tell based on motivation, I don't see mages motivation, so it is a scum tell.

Garmr · Post Post #169 (ISO) » Mon Oct 26, 2015 7:36 pm

In post 166, ICEninja wrote:
Garmr wrote:
His accusing me of having one post of content and doing nothing which is flat out wrong and I'm offended

I accused you of having one post of content
that doesn't DIRECTLY pertain to me or my vote on you
. I also believe it is accurate. If you feel it is inaccurate feel free to ISO yourself and demonstrate where you have contributed content that isn't fluff or doesn't involve me in any way shape or form. Prove me wrong and I will concede the point.

3dice wrote:
The only thing I wanted clipped out of 127 was the "oops" thing. Sometimes when I try to clip quotes I screw up, so I usually tend to not, but I can start for this game.

Using the preview function makes it quite easy to see if you messed up any quote clipping.

Archmage seems to spend a LOT of effort on 146, but the only actual read he seems to have is on Garmr. I like the read on Garmr, but that's pretty much all I like about the post. Recaps don't help much, and I agree with everyone who attacks him for IIoA. Since I know Archmage is going to ask, this stands for
Information Instead of Analysis
, and is a tactic frequently used by scum to act as if they are taking a stance without actually taking a stance. Recap, give information, but commit to nothing.

Garmr continues to fluffpost. Fire continues to fluffpost.

Pistachi0n pops in with a vote for "lazy play". What the hell does that even mean? Please come back and explain your vote with something that indicates alignment.

In post 95, Garmr wrote:I can attest to this is what a town fire bringer would act like as well.

Garmr · Post Post #170 (ISO) » Mon Oct 26, 2015 7:40 pm

also fluff posts not a site wide scum tell anymore ice because of people like me fluff posting all the time as town it's now a individual scum tell than a general one.

MarioManiac4 · Post Post #171 (ISO) » Mon Oct 26, 2015 7:43 pm

In post 160, pistachi0n wrote:Scumread on Mario, he's playing lazily.

VOTE: MarioManiac

Guilty as charged.
I can't get my head into this game and posted a bit.
BUT THEN I COMMITTED THE ULTIMATE SIN.
I...
WENT...
TO...
BED.

Catching up now.

MarioManiac4 · Post Post #172 (ISO) » Mon Oct 26, 2015 7:45 pm

Diego is my primary, and only, scumread.
Consider Scorpius ad 3dice as suspicious.
Everyone else can be town for now.

Garmr · Post Post #173 (ISO) » Mon Oct 26, 2015 10:38 pm

@ice even through I found one thing not relating to you I am starting to see I pretty much tunneled you but meh that doesn't matter to much It's early game through so I got plenty of time to solidify my other reads and it doesn't hurt to give some pressure.

All Alone · Post Post #174 (ISO) » Tue Oct 27, 2015 12:14 am

In post 154, Syndesis wrote:Hi AA Nice to play with you again!

I do agree that it is mostly IIoA (Information Instead of Analysis), but do you think that IIoA is a scumtell in this instance?

In this instance yes. I doubt a townie would feel the need to say things like "3dice posts quotes a lot" or "Davsto is modding the game I'm in" or "pistachi0n has three posts" in a reads list, when those things don't contribute to a read. It comes off like he's trying to say things that he thinks will appear helpful, rather than things that actually helped him.