"There is a thing called flow in this world. There is a thing called timing in warfare."
-Mathiu,Suikoden I
Deadline
"There is a thing called flow in this world. There is a thing called timing in warfare."
-Mathiu,Suikoden I
In post 1117, Reasonably Rational wrote:Firekari: Under what circumstances would you be unable to conftown D2?
-Cerb
In post 1102, Elbirn wrote:
Mfw I realize that this post all 4 of yukari's tulpae plus firebringer voicing their opinion on one player
Mfw I have no face
In post 639, Titus wrote:We know LQ must be scum or there's scum in the pseudo hood. If scum thought they could hammer a townie with no accountability, they would have hammerred LQ. They did not. So scum suspected that the anonymous vote and day end we're both lies, or LQ is scum.
The votes on me are scum motivated. RR gave an explanation for his vote and started to show up. BM and wgeurts did not. Wgerts said he favored LQ over Jeanne. Yet, his vote when the lights go out winds up on me. That's pretty damning for wgeurts.
Klingon votes ranger which is a bit of wtf.
In post 579, Titus wrote:I am an informed messaging townie that can send messages during the day. There are other methods of communicating outside the thread. The fruit is my method of communicating with my block to counteract an uber powerful anti-town role.
There is a role that makes all players vote within 24 hours by pm. It terminates the day after that. All votes are anonymous and cannot be detected by any means.
To counteract this role, we're voting Jeanne or LQ when this happens.
In post 680, Titus wrote:Scum are given a free pass to vote LQ and they don't. Why?
In post 1127, Blackest Magick wrote:If xtoxm was not in this game with me I would have replaced out. You guys post a lot. I should have time to post tonight and tomorrow work has been rough. Gonna trust xtoxm with the voting until I'm up to speed. I'm at page 36
In post 639, Titus wrote:We know LQ must be scum or there's scum in the pseudo hood. If scum thought they could hammer a townie with no accountability, they would have hammerred LQ. They did not. So scum suspected that the anonymous vote and day end we're both lies, or LQ is scum.
The votes on me are scum motivated. RR gave an explanation for his vote and started to show up. BM and wgeurts did not. Wgerts said he favored LQ over Jeanne. Yet, his vote when the lights go out winds up on me. That's pretty damning for wgeurts.
Klingon votes ranger which is a bit of wtf.
We (pokerface & xtoxm) voted titus as we thought that war thing was ending the day. Didn't want to vote no one at day end and figured the role ending the day had to be scum driven. Why would town ever want to end day 1 early or risk it ending early? A townie would save the ability you described for later in the game. I think it would be more effective not on day 1.
In post 579, Titus wrote:I am an informed messaging townie that can send messages during the day. There are other methods of communicating outside the thread. The fruit is my method of communicating with my block to counteract an uber powerful anti-town role.
There is a role that makes all players vote within 24 hours by pm. It terminates the day after that. All votes are anonymous and cannot be detected by any means.
To counteract this role, we're voting Jeanne or LQ when this happens.
In post 680, Titus wrote:Scum are given a free pass to vote LQ and they don't. Why?
You said you were informed townie. You say scum has a role that lets them vote anonymously. Scum obviously knows whether or not they have said role. So they know if the lock came from them. And if not then they know it may be a trap.
BTW titus, why do you think the scum have day talk? I ask because if you thought the scum only had night then your plan was doomed to fail as they wouldn't be able to coordinate a lynch on one player if they only had night. So you want to tell me why you think scum have day talk?
@Jeanne,who do you think is town? Would you say you trust those people?
@Ranger,so marking is bad for the marked. What made you think wguerts was scum that early in the game? Why didn't you vote them for that?
In post 955, Reasonably Rational wrote:In post 954, Ranger wrote:Only for an amateur.Reasonably Rational wrote:Ranger: The value of analysis of RVS on D1, with no further information, comes from meta knowledge.
More experienced players can read deeper into the meaning behind posts and pick up on things.
As stated, marking is bad for the marked, but only if I trigger it. I can always choose not to trigger it. wgeurts was a scumread, and my action is a day-action, so I needed to submit someone, and I figured he was a good choice: someone who was weakly a scumread, but not likely to be lynched.In addition, why wouldn't you wait until further information came from the thread to make your move and mark him?
Furthermore, by marking earlier, discussion about the mark could be had without it distracting from pre-existing things. Marking a player in the middle of the day may have dissolved the LQ wagon, for instance.
Yes, which gives more information that just a conversation about the mark alone gives. Strictly superior to do it later. I feel we're going to disagree on a lot of things though, you have some ideas about the game that I feel are, well, wrong, and so the moves you're making are nonsensical to me.
-Cerb
In post 1134, Titus wrote:Your thoughts on Klingon?
In post 1137, Reasonably Rational wrote:So, for once, I have scum reads on D1! Titus, for all the reasons given previously(the whole gambit was...just...ridiculous). And! Ranger, for developing a scum read strong enough to mark a player after two meaningless posts were made by that player. I'll gladly lynch either of them. ^^ I'll see how Drixx feels.
-Cerb
In post 1139, FireKari wrote:In post 1137, Reasonably Rational wrote:So, for once, I have scum reads on D1! Titus, for all the reasons given previously(the whole gambit was...just...ridiculous). And! Ranger, for developing a scum read strong enough to mark a player after two meaningless posts were made by that player. I'll gladly lynch either of them. ^^ I'll see how Drixx feels.
-Cerb
What do you think the motive behind Titus use of her PR was? We agree that (based on available data) it could have been used better, but is that alignment indicative? If so, then how?
~Yukari
In post 976, Jeanne11 wrote:Okay, here are my reads. They're all gut reads for now.
Town
Titus
Suzune
Elbirn
Myself
Scum
wgeurts
LQ
RR
In post 1031, Jeanne11 wrote:Because Titus and I agreed that the chance of catching scum would be easier with two townies.
And why are you even asking further? Want to learn all the details so you can plan how to survive as scum better?
In post 967, FireKari wrote:In post 960, pistachi0n wrote:VOTE: FireKari
I didn't like her earlier, I especially don't like her convenient LQ vote.
Which vote did you not like and why?
In post 990, Reasonably Rational wrote:Pistachion: please provide content. Weak scumread of Kari, which is strong enough for a vote to you. Got it. Any thoughts on anything else that occurred in this game so far?
-Cerb
In post 1093, Titus wrote:Error Titus Robot mentioned 8 slots.
Titus robot also forgot Klingon as a scumread.