Mini 1730: Suikoden U-Pick GAME OVER

Reasonably Rational · Post Post #1450 (ISO) » Fri Nov 06, 2015 7:20 am

Well, sure, it's possible to do so, but not without blatantly creating the counterwagon and getting yourself lynched on subsequent days.

So, it's not plausibly done in a fashion scum would be likely to do it.

-Cerb

Titus · Post Post #1451 (ISO) » Fri Nov 06, 2015 7:24 am

RR, what do you think of Bright voting Elbrin when you said we should kill the dog?

Reasonably Rational · Post Post #1452 (ISO) » Fri Nov 06, 2015 7:26 am

In post 1451, Titus wrote:RR, what do you think of Bright voting Elbrin when you said we should kill the dog?

I think it was extremely weird. Without knowing who it belongs to, I can't say speculate further. Also, it's a dragon. :p

-Cerb

Titus · Post Post #1453 (ISO) » Fri Nov 06, 2015 7:37 am

Why not just say that at the time?

Reasonably Rational · Post Post #1454 (ISO) » Fri Nov 06, 2015 7:43 am

In post 1453, Titus wrote:Why not just say that at the time?

Because Bright had not displayed any ability to communicate without jumping through hoops I didn't feel like jumping through, and clearly their owner wasn't interested in exposing themselves.

-Cerb

Titus · Post Post #1455 (ISO) » Fri Nov 06, 2015 7:48 am

Noting something's weird would encourage a town bright to communicate. You can observe something without knowing why it happened.

LicketyQuickety · Post Post #1456 (ISO) » Fri Nov 06, 2015 8:03 am

PM sent. voting wgeurts.

ISO · Post Post #1457 (ISO) » Fri Nov 06, 2015 8:05 am

Can't you log in it?

LicketyQuickety · Post Post #1458 (ISO) » Fri Nov 06, 2015 8:06 am

In post 1437, Titus wrote:
In post 1294, LicketyQuickety wrote:
In post 1190, Jeanne11 wrote:Oh, and that reminds me, why didn't LQ answer this question?

In post 1022, Jeanne11 wrote:@Why not use our abilities to full extent in order to catch scum?

@LQ Answer this question or I will assume that you're too afraid to answer it because it'll give you away as scum.

Sorry, but that is a stupid question Jeanne11. Its pretty obvious we should use our abilities to full extent to find Scum, but only if its going to lead to catching Scum and not creating crazy Wifom.

Here. Is part of it. The other is the total lack of fight against you're lynch.

We've already deduced role madness. You've stated such roles should be used to the best of their abilities so using the dog to start a counter wagon would be good.

You certainly have a scumread right?

Have you and your dog/dragon/whatever vote it.

I don't really fight lynches too often anymore. I've been voted off day one enough times to know its harder to defend an accusation than to make one.

LicketyQuickety · Post Post #1459 (ISO) » Fri Nov 06, 2015 8:08 am

In post 1457, wgeurts wrote:Can't you log in it?

No, I have to send a PM to Varsoon and he sends the action. I can't speak intelligibly I don't think. I can only make dragon noises.

Jeanne11 · Post Post #1460 (ISO) » Fri Nov 06, 2015 8:11 am

That info could've been garnered by reading his posts. It doesn't prove you're him.

Titus · Post Post #1461 (ISO) » Fri Nov 06, 2015 8:13 am

In post 1459, LicketyQuickety wrote:
In post 1457, wgeurts wrote:Can't you log in it?

No, I have to send a PM to Varsoon and he sends the action. I can't speak intelligibly I don't think. I can only make dragon noises.

I don't think this is accurate ISOing the mod and Brantz.

If so, why didn't you say so at the initial claim?

Whydid you not claim this restriction the first time I asked you to vote?

Titus · Post Post #1462 (ISO) » Fri Nov 06, 2015 8:14 am

*Bright

Bright · Post Post #1463 (ISO) » Fri Nov 06, 2015 8:17 am

VOTE: Wgeurts

ISO · Post Post #1464 (ISO) » Fri Nov 06, 2015 8:18 am

ISO · Post Post #1465 (ISO) » Fri Nov 06, 2015 8:18 am

Unless he's fake claimed a partner's role this is real

LicketyQuickety · Post Post #1466 (ISO) » Fri Nov 06, 2015 8:19 am

In post 1461, Titus wrote:
In post 1459, LicketyQuickety wrote:
In post 1457, wgeurts wrote:Can't you log in it?

No, I have to send a PM to Varsoon and he sends the action. I can't speak intelligibly I don't think. I can only make dragon noises.

I don't think this is accurate ISOing the mod and Brantz.

If so, why didn't you say so at the initial claim?

Whydid you not claim this restriction the first time I asked you to vote?

Because I didn't think it would actually make a difference. X2

Titus · Post Post #1467 (ISO) » Fri Nov 06, 2015 8:22 am

Mod Vc please

Jeanne11 · Post Post #1468 (ISO) » Fri Nov 06, 2015 8:23 am

Also, I guess 'roles are not alignment indicative' applies to me and/or Titus alone.......

Varsoon · Post Post #1469 (ISO) » Fri Nov 06, 2015 8:24 am

"Just be the way you always are."

-Teo,
Suikoden I

VOTECOUNT 1.17

LicketyQuickety (7):

Ranger, Suzune, Jeanne11, Elbirn, Firekari, Titus, pistachi0n

Ranger (2):

wgeurts, Blackest Magick

Jeanne11 (1):

LicketyQuickety

Bright (1):

Reasonably Rational

Blackest Magick (1):

BRantz

wgeurts (1):

Bright

Not Voting (1):

Klingoncelt

With 14 Alive, it takes 8 to Lynch.
Deadline

: (expired on 2015-11-11 18:55:00)

As a reminder, all role flavor is not alignment indicative.

Titus · Post Post #1470 (ISO) » Fri Nov 06, 2015 8:25 am

In post 1465, wgeurts wrote:Unless he's fake claimed a partner's role this is real

I have PMed the mod to get a Vc to see if LQ is lying.

If LQ has to pm the mod to get Bright to vote, then Varsoon must be here for his claim to be possibly true.

Jeanne11 · Post Post #1471 (ISO) » Fri Nov 06, 2015 8:25 am

See? Even mod says so.

Titus · Post Post #1472 (ISO) » Fri Nov 06, 2015 8:29 am

Any other restrictions LQ?

Titus · Post Post #1473 (ISO) » Fri Nov 06, 2015 8:32 am

In post 1466, LicketyQuickety wrote:
In post 1461, Titus wrote:
In post 1459, LicketyQuickety wrote:
In post 1457, wgeurts wrote:Can't you log in it?

No, I have to send a PM to Varsoon and he sends the action. I can't speak intelligibly I don't think. I can only make dragon noises.

I don't think this is accurate ISOing the mod and Brantz.

If so, why didn't you say so at the initial claim?

Whydid you not claim this restriction the first time I asked you to vote?

Because I didn't think it would actually make a difference. X2

If you're claiming a confirm able role, did you think we wouldn't test it?

Reasonably Rational · Post Post #1474 (ISO) » Fri Nov 06, 2015 8:34 am

*sigh* LQ consistently makes little enough sense that I can't just call his behavior scum, but none of this is verifiable. We know he controls the dragon, or he's scum and one of his teammates is just watching, and/or they have daytalk.

Need you to answer my questions now LQ.

-Cerb