In post 820, Varsoon wrote:A this point, I'd prefer Duppin over Brunn.
what are your thoughts on grayfoxx?
In post 820, Varsoon wrote:A this point, I'd prefer Duppin over Brunn.
In post 768, GrayFoxxxx wrote:@brunn
Reread the specific post regarding Ranger.
Why wouldn't I keep my vote on you? I think you're scum. I'm not as confident in you being scum recently , because your last few posts look a little better. But you have alot of pressure on you, so it's kind of forced content.
Ide like to hear back from ranger, as he is the only other person I would be comfortable voting right now.
In post 519, GrayFoxxxx wrote:Looking a triv wagon I think brunn and/or max are scum.VOTE: max
Brunn is claiming VT. I need to go back and see who voted for him. Why didn't scum run his wagon up, like they did trivs?
I'm ok with voting either, but wanna vote max for pressure.
In post 701, Ranger wrote:Except it wasn't. Maybe it began IN the RVS, but that doesn't make it an RVS wagon. My vote was dead-serious, and pretty much most of the other votes were explicitly serious, too. The peak of the wagon was well after the RVS had ended, in fact.
In post 233, Ranger wrote:Wanted to ask.
Whatever happened to the Errant wagon?We had this, and now...it's down to just three.Errantparabola - (6) goodmorning, Ranger, Makara, Brunneis, The Fire Hermit, Trivium
Errant escaped from L-1 unscathed.
In post 808, The Fire Hermit wrote:I think I said this before, I feel duppin is more likely scum than Brunneis, but Klingon/Tally AtE and flailing has done nothing to encourage me to actually move my vote.
Just continue being attacked and attacked.
Right now:
Varsoon-Town
Ika-Likely Town, potential SK? Doubtful.
Duppin-Scum
Ranger-Scum leaning
Persivul-Town
Max-Town leaning
Grayfoxx-Scum leaning
Errant-Town
In post 799, Ranger wrote:Brunneis, I do believe you skipped this part, unless I missed something in your recent posting.Ranger wrote:What.
To all of these, really, but especially me.
This makes no sense. All three of these (possible exception, Maxwell; I'd have to check) were in your scum pool.
In post 812, duppin wrote:What bothers me, is that you've chosen to push on me instead of Gray. If you are town, I believe GrayFoxxxx should be the obvious lynch from your perspective (because you believe I am his teammate), and if both of us are town he is 99% scum.
The only scenario where it would make sense for you to push on me instead of Gray, is if you believe he might be town and I am scum, but that does not sound like the case at all based on what you've said.
I think Kling's read on me is very questionable - day 1 she says me not being very active isn't a scum tell and was town reading me throughout the whole day, then as soon as I get pushed on today she changes her read and scum reads me for not being very active (I believe she now called it a null tell). I personally believe this is fairly suspicious. I know you can't comment on it Taly, but I just wanted to point it out.
My lynch pool earlier was between you and Persivul, but it's now between you and GrayFoxxxx. I sincerely do not believe you are the alignment. At the moment you seem more suspicious to me based on your overall play and the agenda you are pushing. I think it's weird you chose to go for me over GrayFoxxx, but perhaps I am biased. In my opinion Gray would be the obvious choice from your perspective, but I understand that me pushing on you might've influenced your choice, which I can't blame you for as I tend to do the same.
So I think the choice for todays lynch should be between Brunneis and GrayFoxxxx. I personally think Brunneis is more scummy at the moment, but I think it's very important people voice their opinions, as I'm convinced there is at least one scum between them (it's possible we have a SK so could be two after all, but meh).
GrayFoxxxx wrote:Also brunns latest posts cancel the town vibe he was starting to give off.
In post 837, St Constantine the Hermit wrote:Stop offering ways for Klingon and Persivul (Makara) to slime their way out of the inevitable.
In post 837, St Constantine the Hermit wrote:God, scum have revealed their affiliation with each other literally a half dozen times, and we haven't even lynched scum yet. This was the sixth time.
Stop offering ways for Klingon and Persivul (Makara) to slime their way out of the inevitable.
In post 845, St Constantine the Hermit wrote:Actually I have been deriving parts of my scumread from your post. Earlier in the game I actually noted in the thread that the taly head seemed scummier than the klingon head. Lately that shifted.
In post 846, St Constantine the Hermit wrote:But yeah, I keep thinking of klingon when talking about that slot. I do the same thing in other games with hydras, usually calling out the dominant head.
In post 829, Ika Musume wrote:In post 701, Ranger wrote:Except it wasn't. Maybe it began IN the RVS, but that doesn't make it an RVS wagon. My vote was dead-serious, and pretty much most of the other votes were explicitly serious, too. The peak of the wagon was well after the RVS had ended, in fact.
mm, I'm in the middle of reconsidering my read on you, but this is something that still gives me pause.
In post 233, Ranger wrote:Wanted to ask.
Whatever happened to the Errant wagon?We had this, and now...it's down to just three.Errantparabola - (6) goodmorning, Ranger, Makara, Brunneis, The Fire Hermit, Trivium
Errant escaped from L-1 unscathed.
I still have less than zero idea why you think this means anything in terms of Errant's alignment. it is, on the other hand, the kind of angle I would come up with as scum if I was looking for an easy excuse to push what I think is a consensus read in a way where I don't want people to question it.
In post 824, Ika Musume wrote:I'm not really interested in lynching the SK over group scum today, soooo.