Without two wagons, a game is in RVS to me. I read best by relationships.
In post 179, LoHa wrote:I've read the thread and can't recall a single alignment indicative argument, so we're still in-between RVS and what comes next.
[redacted not about me]
VOTE: Titus
[redacted]
Loha was agreeing me about game state, says nothing about me being scummy.
That's pretty damn clear.
This is pretty weak case you are pushing.
Sarcasm is just a way of saying how stupid you think someone is but in a more polite way.
He self-voted and I had no idea what the fuck that meant. If he had continued with the same behaviour I would have voted him, but he just up and quit. Trying to think about the town motivation behind self-voting, have to make sure he's not VI obviously, but I really can't think of anything. It just perturbs me and I don't feel comfortable voting him with that over me.
Why didn't you vote before he self-voted? In particular at #141. "I wanted him to admit he was lying to me" seems like an odd condition - what kind of scum admits they're lying to you?
uhh yeah, that's the thing, they don't. And whaddya know, pip didn't admit he lied. I N F E R.
...
I assume the inference I'm meant to draw from this is "itlepip did not admit he was lying to you, therefore he is scum".
Which brings me back to this point: if you had made that judgement at the time of that post,
why did you not vote for itlepip then
?
This will lead to the same thing; I wanted to keep going. If he up and blew me off completely, I would've voted him as scum. I needed to push it hard enough for him to know he was lying and still try and keep it from me, but I didn't know if even he knew he was lying. You guys came in stopping me from going further + self-vote is making me wary. Titus's 257 is a pretty good explanation for why he could be town.
hi im Yakko wrote:The vote from pip. Opportunistic as fuck. I like it even more now. Go ahead and hang him.
I mean the things I didn't like about Nosferatu's interaction with itlepip have been partly explained.
I don't townread Nos but I consider the explanation good enough that there are definitely better things to lynch today.
which 3 people would you feel better lynching today?
Didn't have a particular three in mind... but I'd lynch itlepip, feel a bit bad about lynching Titus day 1 on the principle of not lynching experienced players day 1 but maybe do it anyway, and maybe lurker-lynch Kop and pignash.
Would titus scum create a counter wagon on a potentially easy lynch? Does this suggest pip+titus?
If pip isn't scum, it makes more sense from scum-Titus if there are already other scum on the pip wagon, and Titus was looking for somewhere innocuous to park her vote. As counterwagons go it was a bit half-assed.
Without two wagons, a game is in RVS to me. I read best by relationships.
In post 179, LoHa wrote:I've read the thread and can't recall a single alignment indicative argument, so we're still in-between RVS and what comes next.
[redacted not about me]
VOTE: Titus
[redacted]
Loha was agreeing me about game state, says nothing about me being scummy.
Would titus scum create a counter wagon on a potentially easy lynch? Does this suggest pip+titus?
If pip isn't scum, it makes more sense from scum-Titus if there are already other scum on the pip wagon, and Titus was looking for somewhere innocuous to park her vote. As counterwagons go it was a bit half-assed.
Eh that sounds well reasoned bullshit. I mean I get what you're saying but why would scum titus bring attention to themselves creating a half assed counter wagon? Nah nah I'm thinking titus is town.
When the opposition are here you tell them nothing except where the toilets are, but you lie about that right. Fuckity bye
In post 289, hi im Yakko wrote:
...
Eh that sounds well reasoned bullshit. I mean I get what you're saying but why would scum titus bring attention to themselves creating a half assed counter wagon? Nah nah I'm thinking titus is town.
If itlepip is scum, or if itlepip is town but there were scum on his wagon already, what would you expect a scum-Titus to do in that situation?
Bear in mind that (IIRC) there were no other wagons of any description active at the time.
Would titus scum create a counter wagon on a potentially easy lynch? Does this suggest pip+titus?
If pip isn't scum, it makes more sense from scum-Titus if there are already other scum on the pip wagon, and Titus was looking for somewhere innocuous to park her vote. As counterwagons go it was a bit half-assed.
This in a nutshell.
I mean not for anything but pip never said anything to give the impression that Titus is taking.
Using experience is one thing, inventing something a player isn't saying and watching that player grab it as a read and lurking after doesn't make your skin crawl, I'm going to call you scum for it
Sarcasm is just a way of saying how stupid you think someone is but in a more polite way.
In post 289, hi im Yakko wrote:
...
Eh that sounds well reasoned bullshit. I mean I get what you're saying but why would scum titus bring attention to themselves creating a half assed counter wagon? Nah nah I'm thinking titus is town.
If itlepip is scum, or if itlepip is town but there were scum on his wagon already, what would you expect a scum-Titus to do in that situation?
Bear in mind that (IIRC) there were no other wagons of any description active at the time.
In post 289, hi im Yakko wrote:
...
Eh that sounds well reasoned bullshit. I mean I get what you're saying but why would scum titus bring attention to themselves creating a half assed counter wagon? Nah nah I'm thinking titus is town.
If itlepip is scum, or if itlepip is town but there were scum on his wagon already, what would you expect a scum-Titus to do in that situation?
Bear in mind that (IIRC) there were no other wagons of any description active at the time.
beeboy - Everyone thought this game was made to troll pie but it was really made to troll pisskop. Almost50 pisskop: Overall, that's a townie slot. Don't ask for specifics because with PK everything can be interpreted either way. It's probably WHEN he says/does things that matter, so it's more of a matter of conception rather than solid reasoning.
In post 289, hi im Yakko wrote:
...
Eh that sounds well reasoned bullshit. I mean I get what you're saying but why would scum titus bring attention to themselves creating a half assed counter wagon? Nah nah I'm thinking titus is town.
If itlepip is scum, or if itlepip is town but there were scum on his wagon already, what would you expect a scum-Titus to do in that situation?
Bear in mind that (IIRC) there were no other wagons of any description active at the time.
Scum Titus would take control of the thread. :-p
You have not played with scum Titus.
Awfully boastful.
I am about my scumgame. Even if town lynches me with guilties, fake or real as scum, my buddies still kick a lot of ass.
My town game has been pretty hot lately if I don't get bothered tunnelling the wrong targets early because people treat me like shit. So yeah.
TLDR: Titus is a god and you should just give in and follow whatever she says, because if she is town we will win and if she is scum the game is already over...
Dangit, I was liking Titus's defense of me :(.
Also not a fan of pisskops pings that seem to just be following the aqua-farside-yakko groupthink.
