In post 299, itlepip wrote:TLDR: Titus is a god and you should just give in and follow whatever she says, because if she is town we will win and if she is scum the game is already over...
Dangit, I was liking Titus's defense of me .
Also not a fan of pisskops pings that seem to just be following the aqua-farside-yakko groupthink.
Im sorry, were you not capable of finding where our opinions differed? Poor thing you.
beeboy - Everyone thought this game was made to troll pie but it was really made to troll pisskop. Almost50 pisskop: Overall, that's a townie slot. Don't ask for specifics because with PK everything can be interpreted either way. It's probably WHEN he says/does things that matter, so it's more of a matter of conception rather than solid reasoning.
beeboy - Everyone thought this game was made to troll pie but it was really made to troll pisskop. Almost50 pisskop: Overall, that's a townie slot. Don't ask for specifics because with PK everything can be interpreted either way. It's probably WHEN he says/does things that matter, so it's more of a matter of conception rather than solid reasoning.
beeboy - Everyone thought this game was made to troll pie but it was really made to troll pisskop. Almost50 pisskop: Overall, that's a townie slot. Don't ask for specifics because with PK everything can be interpreted either way. It's probably WHEN he says/does things that matter, so it's more of a matter of conception rather than solid reasoning.
In post 308, Titus wrote:
...
I don't work like that. People start as town. Scummy actions (which ipip has none) do that.
Farside backing off Laho pings like a motherfucker, doubly so because she's voting the counter.
I found these posts by itlepip reflective of scum motivaion because they're pointing suspicion at other players but not really pressuring for more information in any way:
Spoiler:
In post 57, itlepip wrote:Saying that your play was what you thought was normal and therefore not suspicious I find very suspicious.
You have 2 with yakko sheeping you...
Was that vote in or out of RVS, cause I have no idea.
You sound disgusted? Maybe I'm reading that wrong. Any particular reason you pointed it out but made zero attempts to figure out why I was sheeping? I like my vote more now.
i was still in RVS, that was just a comment supposed to be taken lightly. It wasn't meant to be personnel.
Also how would I be able this early in the game to give an explanation of your sheeping, most likely it was just a joking RVS sheep, but if my vote was serious than an RVS vote is bad. You could be scum trying a sheeping strategy early but there isn't much evidence for that. There also could be some scum thing I did early that you guys are reacting to, but I have absolutely no idea what it is.
In post 308, Titus wrote:
...
I don't work like that. People start as town. Scummy actions (which ipip has none) do that.
Farside backing off Laho pings like a motherfucker, doubly so because she's voting the counter.
I found these posts by itlepip reflective of scum motivaion because they're pointing suspicion at other players but not really pressuring for more information in any way:
Spoiler:
In post 57, itlepip wrote:Saying that your play was what you thought was normal and therefore not suspicious I find very suspicious.
You have 2 with yakko sheeping you...
Was that vote in or out of RVS, cause I have no idea.
You sound disgusted? Maybe I'm reading that wrong. Any particular reason you pointed it out but made zero attempts to figure out why I was sheeping? I like my vote more now.
i was still in RVS, that was just a comment supposed to be taken lightly. It wasn't meant to be personnel.
Also how would I be able this early in the game to give an explanation of your sheeping, most likely it was just a joking RVS sheep, but if my vote was serious than an RVS vote is bad. You could be scum trying a sheeping strategy early but there isn't much evidence for that. There also could be some scum thing I did early that you guys are reacting to, but I have absolutely no idea what it is.
Can you explain why you don't find that scummy?
She's not going to do that and act like his action are rational because she says so.
Actually I'm fairly confident now about my Titus read.
No way town Titus would ignore a rational convo.
Vote: Titus
Sarcasm is just a way of saying how stupid you think someone is but in a more polite way.
In my iso of you these seem to be the only 'reads' that you have, which both were the general consensus of reads at that point, where are these differing opinions you are talking about.
In post 126, Aquanim wrote:The above about itlepip aside, I'm seeing much more throwing suspicion than looking for information in his posts so far (see #57 and #69 in particular).
In post 57, itlepip wrote:Saying that your play was what you thought was normal and therefore not suspicious I find very suspicious.
This doesn't come off as a joke first off.
Second it really reads awkward as far as comment go.
Are you saying that once someone makes a post that isn't a joke they are banned from RVS and can no longer make joke posts?
Also since when is being awkward scummy?
reads as pretty defensive and concerned for somebody who keeps saying they are not worried by a 2-vote wagon.
UNVOTE: Soren VOTE: itlepip
Not being worried about a 2-vote wagon doesn't mean you don't clarify reads on that wagon. Also the only difference is the titus read, and I meant that as the general consensus of the generally non-sus players, which would include yakko.
This isn't the time for jokes any more. Do you have a reason to think I am scum?
Truth be told. When you asked me to sheep you against nos, and then the Yokka-Aqua scenario played out where he instantly countered didn't sit right with me. I figured it was trying to bait my own votes out according to your wish regardless, and the way Yokka and you keep going round and round after each pressuring encounter you pull seems very systematic.
In post 316, itlepip wrote:
...
Not being worried about a 2-vote wagon doesn't mean you don't clarify reads on that wagon. Also the only difference is the titus read, and I meant that as the general consensus of the generally non-sus players, which would include yakko.
You're replying to it now, but why didn't you reply to it at the time?
In post 316, itlepip wrote:
...
Not being worried about a 2-vote wagon doesn't mean you don't clarify reads on that wagon. Also the only difference is the titus read, and I meant that as the general consensus of the generally non-sus players, which would include yakko.
You're replying to it now, but why didn't you reply to it at the time?
At first my vote was in fact a impulse, I felt something was wrong with what had occurred earlier but wanted to bide my time to formulate a logical response until I gathered my emotion response together.
In post 308, Titus wrote:
...
I don't work like that. People start as town. Scummy actions (which ipip has none) do that.
Farside backing off Laho pings like a motherfucker, doubly so because she's voting the counter.
I found these posts by itlepip reflective of scum motivaion because they're pointing suspicion at other players but not really pressuring for more information in any way:
Spoiler:
In post 57, itlepip wrote:Saying that your play was what you thought was normal and therefore not suspicious I find very suspicious.
You have 2 with yakko sheeping you...
Was that vote in or out of RVS, cause I have no idea.
You sound disgusted? Maybe I'm reading that wrong. Any particular reason you pointed it out but made zero attempts to figure out why I was sheeping? I like my vote more now.
i was still in RVS, that was just a comment supposed to be taken lightly. It wasn't meant to be personnel.
Also how would I be able this early in the game to give an explanation of your sheeping, most likely it was just a joking RVS sheep, but if my vote was serious than an RVS vote is bad. You could be scum trying a sheeping strategy early but there isn't much evidence for that. There also could be some scum thing I did early that you guys are reacting to, but I have absolutely no idea what it is.
Can you explain why you don't find that scummy?
Cuz it's not. You can observe a pattern without asking a question. That's what I do as town.
Questions can easily be used to shape a conversation.
In post 317, TheLhix wrote:
...
Truth be told. When you asked me to sheep you against nos,
I would have preferred an opinion to a sheep.
and then the Yokka-Aqua scenario played out where he instantly countered didn't sit right with me. I figured it was trying to bait my own votes out according to your wish regardless,
>>> and the way Yokka and you keep going round and round after each pressuring encounter you pull seems very systematic. <<<
Yes, it does, doesn't it?
I am curious to know why it keeps happening myself.
In post 321, TheLhix wrote:Just felt like I needed to tell you ^-^ to avoid suspicion
Well, if you're voting me and you think I'm scum, you should be trying to convince other people to vote me with you. If you're not that confident that I'm scum, you should be trying to find out more or not be voting in the first place. Which is it?
In post 316, itlepip wrote:
...
Not being worried about a 2-vote wagon doesn't mean you don't clarify reads on that wagon. Also the only difference is the titus read, and I meant that as the general consensus of the generally non-sus players, which would include yakko.
You're replying to it now, but why didn't you reply to it at the time?
At first my vote was in fact a impulse, I felt something was wrong with what had occurred earlier but wanted to bide my time to formulate a logical response until I gathered my emotion response together.