In post 424, itlepip wrote:
Honestly I kinda feel that this game is being dominated by town, and scum is just slipping through the cracks a lot.
...
What are you doing about it?
In post 424, itlepip wrote:
Honestly I kinda feel that this game is being dominated by town, and scum is just slipping through the cracks a lot.
...
In post 427, Aquanim wrote:Not sure about town, but #424 is a higher quality post than any of his others by some margin. If that keeps up I have no objection to him living to day 2.
Provisionally:
UNVOTE: itlepip
@Farside: What is your opinion of LoHa? Particularly with reference to his latest post.
In post 429, Aquanim wrote:EBWOP: My opinion is that given how much has happened in the thread between it and the last time he posted, it is VERY thin. Much more could have been said by an interested townie.
In post 431, TheLhix wrote:What is the reasoning behind getting rid of titus? They seem to be searching with scum with invigoration and their arguments (while thin at times) don't fail to make sense totally.
In post 429, Aquanim wrote:EBWOP: My opinion is that given how much has happened in the thread between it and the last time he posted, it is VERY thin. Much more could have been said by an interested townie.
In post 432, farside22 wrote:In post 431, TheLhix wrote:What is the reasoning behind getting rid of titus? They seem to be searching with scum with invigoration and their arguments (while thin at times) don't fail to make sense totally.
Because she is scum.
You think calling one player scum based on one post is seriously scum hunting?
In post 433, farside22 wrote:In post 429, Aquanim wrote:EBWOP: My opinion is that given how much has happened in the thread between it and the last time he posted, it is VERY thin. Much more could have been said by an interested townie.
Just looking back on loha post he thought thelhix and Titus were scum on his wagon.
At that time she already made a point why loha was scum so the question just seems fillerish
what from from your 425 and 427 that lead you to "like" his post?In post 427, Aquanim wrote:Not sure about town, but #424 is a higher quality post than any of his others by some margin. If that keeps up I have no objection to him living to day 2.
Provisionally:
UNVOTE: itlepip
@Farside: What is your opinion of LoHa? Particularly with reference to his latest post.
In post 401, Aquanim wrote:That's not an answer to this, I don't think.
There IS no wagon at that stage. Why would Farside be trying to work out if she can run a wagon on her buddy, when she could just... not, and sit on her reasonably popular Pip wagon?
What is the actual point of that play? Considering how much pull Farside has in this thread there seems to me that there would be considerable risk of the wagon taking off. I simply don't buy it as a bus. Too little reward for far too much risk.
In post 440, pignash wrote:I really need to separate my name into Pig Nash so people can say one or the other, who do I ask about that?
In post 442, pignash wrote:I think it's because I'm playing similarly to my scum game in NY 190, but that's just how I play really.
In post 437, LoHa wrote:VOTE: pisskop
Fun stops now, scum.
This guy hasn't done anything either.
Let's see if he'll omgus like the other or what.
In post 437, LoHa wrote:VOTE: pisskop
Fun stops now, scum.
This guy hasn't done anything either.
Let's see if he'll omgus like the other or what.
In post 415, farside22 wrote:In post 371, pisskop wrote:I think Farside is acting like a silly bugger. Dont know what that means wrt her alignment yet though.
How so?