In post 1127, Persivul wrote: In post 1125, Brunneis wrote:Pers, where the hell did that vote come from?
1) Why aren't you considering Max's slot to be scum - yet you do a quick ISO on duppin and vote him out of nowhere?
WTF...is no one reading the fucking thread?
705 - I scum read duppin
708 - I pressure duppin and vote duppin
711 - More pressure on duppin
723 - I negatively note duppin's use of self meta
776 - I ask Ranger to explain why she town reads duppin
778 - I argue against her explanation
810 - I move my vote as a duppin wagon wasn't viable, but state that I still like a duppin wagon better.
But I just did a quick ISO of him and voted him out of nowhere...
This is some of the worst mafia I've ever seen.
In conclusion...fuck you all. I was right before when I said that no one's really reading this game, they're just waiting for someone to post so they can pick it apart. I should have stuck to that.
1)
This is what I mean by "out of nowhere"
You had a conversation with Ika about Max; Ika pointed out that Max's play seemed like a scumplay.
You then applied all that to duppin logic to duppin:
In conclusion, duppin is scum by your own standards. He played an entire game day around nothing but consensus reads without any effort to engage other scum reads whatsoever.
Someone might argue to you that some players have different playstyles from you and might do that as town, but you've already declared: they just don't.
And not even SPEAK to Ika about her assessment of Max's play, and why she thinks he is scum.
2)
Furthermore, you shoot up a wagon on duppin with:
A)
No engagement with duppin prior
B)
You say you're sure Ika will join you but then say you doubted it - this looks contrived.
C)
You didn't even QUESTION Ika on why she thought Max was scum versus Duppin.
Just because you scumread and suspect Duppin doesn't validate you wagoning him by applying another persons thought process onto them, and then just ISOing them which in turn - ignoring the other persons argument against someone else and then prodding them to sheep you.
In post 1128, Persivul wrote:Taly, here's a fucking clue for you. Before you say PlayerX is voting PlayerY "out of nowhere":
1. Click on ISO at the top of PlayerX's post
2. Hit Ctrl+f (in Chrome, or whatever it is in the browser you're using)
3. Type PlayerY in the search box and hit Enter
4. READ THE FUCKING POSTS WHERE PLAYERX MENTIONS PLAYERY AND SEE IF YOU'RE PULLING THE "OUT OF NOWHERE" CHARGE OUT OF YOUR ASS BEFORE YOU MAKE IT
This is hurtful, if not unnecessary.
So you're going to ignore all THREE OTHER POINTS I MADE on you, and your vote on duppin - just to berate me for "not reading your posts" and focus your aggression on MY thought to you - that your vote didn't look like it was produced naturally; and then you attack me instead of trying to UNDERSTAND ME?
In post 1129, Persivul wrote:I've had it with this game. I'll make the minimum posts so you don't have to wait for another replacement. At end of phase if you need a fifth vote I'll go with whatever the majority is.
UNVOTE:
.....
I can't see this frustration coming from town at this point.
Pers, I honestly don't understand your frustration with this game. You ignored a lot of points and questions people have thrown at you, and when it seems like nobody is supporting you on a push or thought you have - you blow up and quit continuing with either - your conviction, you actually trying to have a conversation with someone, or both.
I'm seriously trying to speak to you and sort some things out but I don't feel the same motivation coming from you in reciprocation; and even if this was mylo - and even town gets pissy every now and then, that's not excusing you for taking this approach.
>>>>>
On another note, is anyone else wanting a post from Troy right about now?
I just saw Ranger going VLA... sigh.
~Taly