In post 120, Lucky2u wrote:This is fairly accurate. I'm taking a backseat on purpose while the holiday finishes. Sorry, I know that's shitty, but I am following along.
I actually did the same thing quite a couple of times, regardless of my alignment. I think it's a null.
In post 121, Yosarian2 wrote:ABR is basically playing in his normal meta. Loud, obnoxious, picking fights. It's basically how I expect town-ABR to act. It's not really an alignment tell, he could do that as either alignment, but I haven't seen any red flags from him yet.
I wouldn't describe ABR's play I know in a way like that. In spite of it, that seems to be the town-ABR I've seen before.
In post 123, AlwaysInnocent wrote:However, if a player seriously pushes for the lynch of another player, and this would have taken a huge risk if both were scum, then I am more inclined to believe that they are not scum together, i.e., that at least one of them is innocent.
Not essentially. Scum-scum puppetshows do exist.
And you're speculating too much.
Why?
What do you think of AlwaysInnocent?
In post 127, AlwaysInnocent wrote:VOTE: Lucky2u
I know that we are still transitioning from RVS to scumhunting, but Lucky2u is playing too minimalistic now even for my taste. I want to see more from him.
Are you just voting any wagon gains momentum?
I don't think we're still in the transition of RVS–scumhunting.
AlwaysInnocent, 135 – again, speculating instead of scumhunting.
In post 136, AlwaysInnocent wrote:Kidding, right?In post 134, roflcopter wrote:In post 132, AlwaysInnocent wrote:I have my doubts about KMD, but I am curious why you think that. Like I said, trying to find positive connections between scum on D1 often fails. So why do you think you are able to find a connection between me and KMD? For giving up so easily on me? That caught my attention, too. But what does it tell us? Not much.In post 130, roflcopter wrote:kmd and alwaysinnocent are scumbuddies. you heard it here first.
scumbuddies confirmed
In post 138, AlwaysInnocent wrote:Well, good that you aren't then, because that would be totally reckless.In post 137, roflcopter wrote:if i were a dayvig i would shoot you right now
unvote, vote: always innocent
BTW. Why me, and not KMD?
This last bit tells me that KMD's not scum but AlwaysInnocent is. Or at least, scums often try to "lead" players to their suspected buddy if they know the buddy-guess is wrong.
In post 146, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:There most definitely is. Scum would happily spend most of their time posting about theory because it distracts from actually scum hunting. Both your posting and Kop's posting around this subject makes me feel uneasy.
^^
That!
BBT could be town, I guess. I know those "interrogative BBT-catchups".
In post 147, AlwaysInnocent wrote:If other people want to play without theory, then that is up to them. I, however, refuse to play without theory. I don't play chess without theory either.
Hhhhhhhhhh
BBT, I guess you remember JK9 – and everything I did there as scum. ^_^
Why is Yossarian scummier than AlwaysInnocent?
In post 151, Yosarian2 wrote:People make the mistake of "looking for people doing something scummy", but that's backwards; scum usually look null-ish if they're at all competent. So instead you need to look for people who are doing something townie and then lynch someone who's not.
Your logic is bad and you should feel bad. ^_^
In post 157, Lowell wrote:I note Yos' vociferous defense of AI in 151. My suspicion is that it makes Yos more likely scum and AI more likely town.
I have limited experience on Yossarian but he seems to be a vociferator.
In post 163, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:
People usually confirm in different ways; a few examples to illustrate my point.
'/confirm. Let's get this game going.'
'/confirm, wooooo, I'm excited'
'/confim, y'all are making me nervous already.'
'/confirm, accompanied with random GIF' etc etc.
I'm sure you get the point now.
Yeah, I've seen such things before but sometimes players just post /confirm. I'd never consider it a tell. (And I thought you'd been joking in that very early post.)
In post 165, AlwaysInnocent wrote:It makes perfect sense to hunt for lurkers early D1. Mainly to pressure them to become more active, making it easier to read them.
Fighting a lurker instead of an active player is a thing scums often do. (Actually I did the same in another C9 game. The first scum-game on MafiaScum ever.)
In post 170, roflcopter wrote:actually he's right the verbiage of the pm was very specific, part of why i found your opening point dumb. also we're way beyond arguing about whose confirms are scummy now so lets just get together and lynch always innocent for actually being obvscum.
Gzzzzzzzzz I haven't even read that part. ^_^
(Wow, I'm a caught scum now, aren't I?)