I've pointed to a specific thing I didn't like that you did. I asked you for an explanation and made it very clear that I would reconsider in light of new information if you provided one. The idea that I'm just tunneling for no reason is crazy. You've replied to me directly multiple times and basically told me to go fuck myself when I asked you to simply explain your rationale. Oh wait - you literally
did
tell me to go fuck off one time.
And you have the audacity to say I'm tunneling/confbiasing? GIVE ME A REASON NOT TO SCUMREAD YOU. It's not like I'm shutting out new information. You're just refusing to provide it.
Here's a montage of some of the times Persivul has refused to do something as simple as explain how his reads have changed over time, to me and others. How is he still alive?
In post 176, Persivul wrote:I'm going to need to hear why you're no longer voting me and why you are voting Soren if I'm to remove my vote from you, because from what I can see, your move onto and off of me look awful.
Fuck you.
Bring it on.
I'm not concerned.
In post 265, Persivul wrote:I intended to show that your 12.25 posting was better as a defense, but now that I look at it closer, it's pretty bad. Before the game I know I
wanted
you to be town so I could learn something about scum hunting, and I think that played into the post that you're pushing.
In post 272, Persivul wrote:I'm trying to understand where that transition came from. If you were scum, it would be a convenient transition. If you were town, you'd have some rationale for it. So your roadmap to "get on the same page" is to explain to me clearly what you were thinking at the time you made the transition, if that's what you want to do. That doesn't mean you have to agree with your own rationale now - if you changed your mind on my posting, that's not scummy. But I need to understand what you were thinking then, or my scumread will persist (and probably strengthen, for that matter).
Reviewing that day I'm no longer interested in getting on the same page with you.
In post 278, Persivul wrote:You play your way, I'll play mine. It's not uncommon to give people town reads on this site without an interrogation. You saw Rob and Broseiden do it, but for some reason you haven't followed up with them and are only pressuring me for it.
And bonus points for Persivul saying he's not avoiding scrutiny. LOL
In post 186, Persivul wrote: In post 184, Rob14 wrote:Scum has a motivation to avoid scrutiny above all else.
And I have the highest post count in the game. I'm not concerned with avoiding scrutiny. Scrutinize away. Lynch me if you like, but playing like that you'll likely end up with a knife in your back yourself.
Come on! Really, do you expect me to buy that? Under no circumstances does it make sense for a townie to refuse to explain the process by which their reads changed. Maybe if night actions had already occurred, but we're on day one here. Be realistic.