Well you're both town anyway, so.In post 390, Cerberus v666 wrote:What if I told you I was masons with Jeanne, how would that change your appraisal and why?
Not liking Elbirn around Page 17, either.
tn
Well you're both town anyway, so.In post 390, Cerberus v666 wrote:What if I told you I was masons with Jeanne, how would that change your appraisal and why?
This is pure scumposting, 100%.In post 435, Davsto wrote:So far, Elbirn looks town and Jeanne... I... I don't even know. "Lynching an investigative is scummy and I could be investigative thus you are scummy"? What even? But she's probably town, even if she is probably causing more harm than good if she continues in this manner. 3dice feels sorta similar to the game where he was my scumpartner but I don't know his town game so I'm not gonna do anything on that front.Talk about going for the easy targets.In post 295, DiamondSentinel wrote:Well shit. I reread and both 3dice and Jeanne are scummy AF
VOTE: DiamondSentinel
Titus slot is 1000% town.
People without avatars. Grumble grumble. I guarantee I will either mix up Cerberus and RolePlay or forget that one of them exists. Please, for all that is holy, get an avatar one of you.
^This.In post 439, zMuffinMan wrote:i don't really have an issue with the two miller claims and it's even less of an issue in a role madness game
also, i think shiro is more likely than not town
In post 474, Elbirn wrote:Shiro let's be masons
I can be your sidekick and help your brainwaves or something
Shiro and elbirn, 100 years of shiro and Elbirn .com
In post 2129, Mass Flop wrote:tn's almost definitely scum, but I feel like he's scum who was bussed
In post 2113, RolePlay25 wrote:If something actually "invalidates my position" then I'll listen. If you make a crappy point based on the replacement queue that I refute and that you then nitpick and whine that my meta analysis is bad, I'm going to ignore that, because that is a very stupid thing for anyone to post and I don't really feel like talking about stupid things.
In post 660, itlepip wrote:either this is a really bad soft claim where it really should be, or (more likely) this is scum reaching. The way I read this scum doesn't know how strong town roles are, so they are trying to weed out a cap before any potential claim.
In post 660, itlepip wrote:So don't tolerate me being suboptimal, but that can't ever be used to at all ever against me because it might help me get lynched later, I don't get why town would go for this defense. Basically it is saying sorry I'm new, but reads awkwardly because you also want to make sure you won't get lynched today. This is a FoS for now, probably will become a vote at the end of my catch-up
In post 665, itlepip wrote:Okay this is straight BS. I'm scum reading you because you are playing so safe and scared of conflict or people scumreading you. If you actually wanted to do this and weren't just taking the piss you would be doing gambits and fake claims instead of once in a while making a routine post without any real reads in it.
In post 667, itlepip wrote:VOTE: Cerberus fuck it.
The fact that he hasn't voted, hasn't really any reads, and his entire game is just small points (actively lurking) rather than real content is bad, especially when he is making a big show of not going to be lynched is pretty scummy in my book.
In post 2117, RolePlay25 wrote:Muffin's starting to doubt, he wouldn't offer the nacho pact if he thought I was totally wrong.
In post 2123, Shiro wrote:@zmuffin
I am pretty sure it was said in the signup that characters pick will affect our roles.. My theory is that alignments were first roled then roles were made based on the flavour.
Flavour correlation is 100% I mean look at your role pm, there is no way flavour wasn't taken in consideration when creating the roles.
In post 2134, zMuffinMan wrote:In post 2123, Shiro wrote:@zmuffin
I am pretty sure it was said in the signup that characters pick will affect our roles.. My theory is that alignments were first roled then roles were made based on the flavour.
Flavour correlation is 100% I mean look at your role pm, there is no way flavour wasn't taken in consideration when creating the roles.
no. this was never said. if it was, i wouldn't have joined this game because that's borderline fucking retarded
and yes, flavour is related to roles - nobody is contesting that...
In post 667, itlepip wrote:VOTE: Cerberus fuck it.
The fact that he hasn't voted, hasn't really any reads, and his entire game is just small points (actively lurking) rather than real content is bad, especially when he is making a big show of not going to be lynched is pretty scummy in my book.
In post 2130, Jeanne11 wrote:tn flipped scum.
In post 2136, RolePlay25 wrote:It's all shit you could post in Mafia Discussion without even playing in a game muffin
In post 2136, RolePlay25 wrote:So if you want to be worthless, be worthless. You can leave the name calling out of it.