In post 73, rkvothe wrote:@axle well, wouldn't be massclaims an easier way to scumhunt? I do see the negatives, but there are positives as well, more 'meat' to scumhunt.
The pressure against errant about not being very excited is silly.
Are we reading the same game?
When the opposition are here you tell them nothing except where the toilets are, but you lie about that right. Fuckity bye
Well, it's my wird against yours, but 67 was sincere. I do admit that I'm starting to follow what should I do. Your post was helpful.
Regards 70, it wasn't credit grab at all. I've pointed it out because he wasn't adding anything new to the table, I'd say that it was a 'free post'. Also, it was the third time itbwas said. Look at my wording: 'I also agree...'. The hydra talks like he made a discovery no one knew of.
3dicerolling- play seems a bit removed from other early games I've played with you. null for now.
Frozen Angel- i really don't want to townread you right now.but as a whole your flippancy seems removed from your scumplay. null-town.
hi im Yakko- your interaction with FA seems awkward which makes me want to lean scum, but I don't think it's indicative. null.
Ranger- i found myself agreeing with a lot of the early stances you took. town.
Aristophanes- Don't remember your History Mafia play but no real interaction in your first post so I'm watching you closely. null-scum.
AxleGreaser- see my previous reasons. scum.
AlwaysInnocent- tone seems removed from townplay but i don't take stock in this meta read (and I don't have much confidence in meta as a whole to define cases). the whole neutral thing is just weird. scum.
rkvothe- see my previous reasons. null- scum.
Errantparabola- smells bad so avoid irl.
p-edit: rkvothe. so in regard to 70, do you think that Anxiety is scummier for presenting an idea that was on the table as their own?
I dont see any hand waving that would explain why its beneficial even on D2.
There are 5 vaguely defined town slots and then 9 other people who will either probably fake claim or have been randomed into the slots.
Rather a lot of combinations of numbers of each type of slot is reasonably possible by chance.
It, the actual claims, may get you info that is slightly better than random lynching.
But my math says not much.
and there exist downsides. Consigliere is a mafia role because the information mass claim gives away is worth something.
and ...
here let me put it in experince
ive played 1000+ of this games on the sc2 mafia mod
In post 78, Errantparabola wrote:Frozen Angel- i really don't want to townread you right now.but as a whole your flippancy seems removed from your scumplay. null-town.
Why are you asking me if there are other reasons you asked that question?
What was the reason you asked that question?
I shared what I thought the reason was and I'm going to keep believing it until I see an alternative.
Well, it's my wird against yours, but 67 was sincere. I do admit that I'm starting to follow what should I do. Your post was helpful.
Regards 70, it wasn't credit grab at all. I've pointed it out because he wasn't adding anything new to the table, I'd say that it was a 'free post'. Also, it was the third time itbwas said. Look at my wording: 'I also agree...'. The hydra talks like he made a discovery no one knew of.
Pedit:
@yakko why'd you say that?
In post 80, rkvothe wrote:Yeah, pretty much. As it was scummy to 'credit grab' in my case.
OK WTF are you talking about?
ika suggested in 69 that we don't massclaim today since there is no lynch today and that we massclaim D2 instead.
You said you said the exact same thing in [pos]t67[/post] but said nothing of the sort.
Then you go on and on about how we are scummy for "credit grabbing" something you said, when ika has played this game numerous times and knows good strategy on how to do it and he DID NOT say the same thing you did.
This totally smells like scum looking for any reason to scumread another person. Even a pathetic one like this.
Well, it's my wird against yours, but 67 was sincere. I do admit that I'm starting to follow what should I do. Your post was helpful.
Regards 70, it wasn't credit grab at all. I've pointed it out because he wasn't adding anything new to the table, I'd say that it was a 'free post'. Also, it was the third time itbwas said. Look at my wording: 'I also agree...'. The hydra talks like he made a discovery no one knew of.
Pedit:
@yakko why'd you say that?
In post 80, rkvothe wrote:Yeah, pretty much. As it was scummy to 'credit grab' in my case.
OK WTF are you talking about?
ika suggested in 69 that we don't massclaim today since there is no lynch today and that we massclaim D2 instead.
You said you said the exact same thing in 67 but said nothing of the sort.
Then you go on and on about how we are scummy for "credit grabbing" something you said, when ika has played this game numerous times and knows good strategy on how to do it and he DID NOT say the same thing you did.
This totally smells like scum looking for any reason to scumread another person. Even a pathetic one like this.
Like seriously rkvothe, you either don't know how to play the game or are scum or both.
I'm kind of concerned that Aronis posted one post that said zero. Does anyone know if this is how he is as scum? I don't know that I've ever played with him.
As i have previously defined how it is different and you have previously defined yourself as the absolute authority on the game setup.
I guess we have nothing to discuss then.
I may or may not in the end get use out of the question. That will depend on eventually finding out what the answer to 24 is and it making some sense to me.
It was however something I wanted to get straight.
Various people do as town interpret my early play differently and a major difference is whether they have seen me play before.
I wanted to tie down whether whatever read or categorization Ranger made of me is based on comparing me with general normal play, or against knowledge of how I personally play.