In post 293, droog wrote:In post 14, Performer wrote:Strange that Axle asked Keyser about fake claim, during RVS. Never seen this happen before.
its random questions instead of random votes
In post 65, AlwaysInnocent wrote:Time for a read list. The game has almost been solved already.
From town to scum:
Read List D1 V1
{AlwaysInnocent}
{Ircher}
{Performer}
{Lilac, Heat}
{Massive}
{Mafiaturtle}
{Burning_Earth, Deus}
{Raskolnikov}
{Pisskop, Keyser, Axle}
In post 300, Performer wrote:In post 293, droog wrote:In post 14, Performer wrote:Strange that Axle asked Keyser about fake claim, during RVS. Never seen this happen before.
its random questions instead of random votes
Welcome, droog. Thanks for pointing this out - I haven't heard that phrase used in a really long time -random questioninstead of rvs. I know it's still a little early but can we get a reads list?
In post 100, pisskop wrote:vote: pisskop
Like I dont even care about this game, and the fapterbation and trying to force us out of lylo with overanalysis is something both keysor and ai do.
I scumread ai for sure. Take a look at his very small meta and tell me why.
In post 124, UpTooLate wrote:Let’s talk about this wagon on PK. Burning and Ras voted him in RVS, then AI jumps on the wagon, changing his vote from Ircher to PK “because he’s scum.” He later lists his reasons, where Keyser “feels like sheeping this” and jumps on too, at which point PK just gives up and selfvotes putting himself at L-2 because he doesn’t care and this game is dumb. Ircher now wants to lynch him based on his poor attitude (but isn’t doing anything about it?).
AI’s reasons for voting him aren’t bad. PK has been at him with nothing of substance, with no sense of real intent. Unless, of course, he was just trying to see what reaction he could get out of the guy that, at the time, wasn’t really contributing much either. If that’s the case, it worked. He definitely got a reaction.
What’s really bothering me is the selfvote. He says he doesn’t care about this game, and yet, he doesn’t want to let somebody who does sub in for him. At this point, we’re put in a crappy situation. If we Policy Lynch like Ircher is suggesting, he may flip town and we’re already down on day 1, which isn't a good start. If we don’t and he survives the night, he may just continue with his current level of participation (or lack thereof) and draining attitude.
I guess what I want to know, PK, is what exactly is your intent with the selfvote?
In post 132, Raskolnikov wrote:Alarm bells went off in my head when I read these.
[/spoiler] In post 162, Heat wrote:My only read right now is that I don't think pisskop is as scummy as people are making him seem
That and I don't like ircher right. He's pushing pisskop but doesn't want to be held accountable for his lynch
In post 204, Heat wrote:The only one who I agreewith here is AG. Ircher seems incredibly intent to frame pisskop in a way that strikes me as really scummy. He suggests a PL, but then doesn't vote him because he doesn't want to push him up to L-1. He even acknowledges that he's likely to be wrong. That doesn't make a lot of sense to me,and it kinda signals to me that he knows more than the rest of us, aka he's scum.
I'm currently voting for AI (orig. it was a RVS vote, but I'm quite comfortable with it right now). Like who just refuses to discuss their reads list because the other person hasn't contributed? its a reads list, and you must have reasons for them. And I'd like to know them.
I like AG for town right now. He's engaged and is asking other people questions, and he doesn't seem like he has anything to hide. I'm in agreement with you there.
In post 306, droog wrote:dont like this on gut
it feels like
trying to overthink to look town
like talking and all is good but
i just dont see anything valuable about the pk wagon to analyze this early
In post 316, droog wrote:In post 306, droog wrote:dont like this on gut
it feels like
trying to overthink to look town
like talking and all is good but
i just dont see anything valuable about the pk wagon to analyze this early
In post 283, AxleGreaser wrote:kaiser you have asked me various "leading", questions on "A vs B".
In post 305, droog wrote:otherwise just an easy target to waste time on
In post 315, Raskolnikov wrote:Alright, the leading wagon is on me. I think you guys have fairly decent and justified concerns about my lack of involvement and my short posts and lack of explanations.
It sounds retarded to say but the reasons behind this wagon are actually good even if it's wrong about me being scum.