In post 3723, Edgar Allan Pro wrote:Waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaait one fucking minute. Are we not going to use the dreamer power today? Am I missing something?
It has already been used.
In post 3723, Edgar Allan Pro wrote:Waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaait one fucking minute. Are we not going to use the dreamer power today? Am I missing something?
In post 3729, Davsto wrote:I'll attempt to kill myself when the time comes which I would need to be lynched otherwise
But honestly I doubt the game will get to that point
In post 3733, Cerberus v666 wrote:LH, 3dice, hammer? RP is going off on aspects of what's been said that he misunderstood again, and I simply do not have the energy to correct him this time.
RolePlay25 wrote:Okay, lets look at this claim.
It's a third party claim that doesn'tquitealignment shift, but definitely y'know, alignment shifts. Can be either town or scum, based on alignment of target.
Moderator: Could a role have its win condition altered such that depending on in-game events that role would either effectively be aligned with the town or scum? Or would that be effectively alignment shift, and thus bastard?
Anyway, even looking at that... it tells me nearly nothing. Muffin targeted him, then... became a non-entity. He's fallen off the face of the planet. And if I had that role, there's NO WAY I would think that I would win with the scum. I mean it basically says you share the alignment of the person who targets you. So it would really be obvious from the outset you didn't win with whoever. And why would you claim survivor over that? That's a much better claim than survivor, but survivor was the first claim you went to?
No, if you have that role, muffin targeted you and is scum, and you now have the scum win condition. I tend to doubt it though.
Nice claim. Nice gambit. A different time, a different game, a town in a worse situation, and it might have worked, especially if your first choice wasn't survivor.
In post 3737, Edgar Allan Pro wrote:Oh shit. That really WOULD be clever. Why wouldn't I have claimed that? Maybe something stops me from claiming that. Whoooooooo caaaaaaaaan saaaaaaaaaay
In post 3738, Cerberus v666 wrote:Hmm. I'd really like it if a lot of people were talking more. I hate seeing the disconnect, it feels like we have apathy on day fucking 2 already. :-/
In post 3746, 3dicerolling wrote:EAP - Let's say, theoretically, you are a reflexive compulsive bodyguard survivor. You win with whoever. Why should we assume that muffin isn't scum? It would be more beneficial for you to survive if scum targets you because you know scum isn't going to kill another scum.
In post 3747, Edgar Allan Pro wrote:In post 3746, 3dicerolling wrote:EAP - Let's say, theoretically, you are a reflexive compulsive bodyguard survivor. You win with whoever. Why should we assume that muffin isn't scum? It would be more beneficial for you to survive if scum targets you because you know scum isn't going to kill another scum.
Hey, man: You can cop muffin if you wanna. Then he will probably be double confirmed and bullet proof. Oh fuck, can someone just cop muffin and then not kill me if he flips town?