Micro 566: WORD SNEAK MAFIA! (Game OvER!!!)

[Postie]

I see GL has come up with one possible strategy for this.

@mod

- Is there anything stopping us from just attaching a list of like 100+ randomly generated words to the bottom of every post?

[Postie]

VOTE: Wednesday

For mispelling my name in a way that makes it look like a cute abbreviation for prostate.

[Postie]

VOTE: TMWSTW

This isn't an RVS vote.

[Postie]

I'm going to be surprised if anyone guesses a single word correctly in this entire goldfish-shaped game.

[Postie]

bungaloo

Is this even a word?

So far I have mwstw as town as his actions were clear concise and transparent vote was on him to get a wagon going then he voted I wanted to see who else would vote postie did. So I'll be looking at postie next.

I should probably explain why I'm voting him then, now that I have the time.
Whatever he was doing, it started in post 10 and he decided it "wasn't working" in post 22 - what's the point in trying this kind of "gambit" if you just give up after 12 posts? That, and the fact that it's rare for RVS wagons to really tell anybody anything anyway, makes it look like the whole thing was just an early grab for towncred to me.

[Postie]

Also, can you explain why you thought me getting on the wagon was scummy, Wednesday?

[Postie]

Also it is funny when you guys are saying it didn't do anything or help, making do exactly what I wanted and help exactly how I intended.

Huh?

I think he means that he was trying to move the game out of RVS with his "gambit" and it has sort-of succeeded in moving the game out of RVS.

This in no way invalidates the points brought up against what you were doing though, TMWSTW.

[Postie]

Also I moved on because even though there hadn't been many posts they were all new people actively ignoring what I did, and I had to choose between continuing to do something people were ignoring or answer lilith's question.

What made you think people would continue ignoring what you were doing?
And you didn't really have to ignore lilith's question, you could have said something along the lines of "I can't really answer this right now but I'll explain later".

[Postie]

I'll get to this game again properly tomorrow, but TMWSTW is looking townier now for how he seems to be persistently making attempts to form reads and reevaluating them where necessary.

UNVOTE:

For now I'll

VOTE: lilac

Not enough scumhunting going on. Although my vote could easily be on Davsto too at this point.

[Postie]

So why'd you pick me over Davsto?

Davsto at least has a read on Wednesday, even if it's all gut, whereas you've yet to really form or attempt to form any conclusions. Too much defense, not enough offense. Happy with my vote.

BTW

@Aeronaut

how do sneak words work for the scums? Will they be able to discuss them at night?

What was the purpose of this question?

[Postie]

Yeah, but is there any particular reason why you were interested in that information?

[Postie]

Ehh, okay. You've been cautious enough so far that if you were scum, you probably would have just PM'd the mod to avoid someone questioning you on your question, like now.

[Postie]

VOTE: lilac post looks like backtracking from davsto.

Can you explain this further?

[Postie]

Well I'd assume the "partially random" thing meant that it wasn't fully random because she gave a reason, but it wasn't a "serious case" because the reason was an RVS-ish one. Makes sense to me and doesn't strike me as backpeddling at all.

[Postie]

I think the whole argument is WIFOM, but it in my view shines a bad light on Postie for pushing it so hard.

I knew it was WIFOM; I was pushing it to see how lilac would react.

[Postie]

Catching up.

Well I'd assume the "partially random" thing meant that it wasn't fully random because she gave a reason, but it wasn't a "serious case" because the reason was an RVS-ish one. Makes sense to me and doesn't strike me as backpeddling at all.

I disagree.

Ooookay, but... why?

Why are you voting lilac?

I already explain this.

[Postie]

Yeah, I'm uncomfortable with pretty much every single person who has gotten on the lilac wagon's reasons for getting on the lilac wagon. Not a good sign.

UNVOTE:

[Postie]

Also, what about Postie makes her town to you? You said she put pressure on a bizarre issue, how is that town?

Given that vandergeist never said she was townreading me for putting pressure on a "bizzare issue", is the "how is that town?" supposed to imply that the fact I "put pressure on a bizzare issue" is scummy? If so, why?

[Postie]

He did call you town(ish), and I think it was implied that it was because of the pressure on lilac:

I got prodded too, sorry I've been spending way too much time recently playing Fallout 7.

So all we need is Postie to start pressuring on a bizzare issue and we get all this support from weak side arguments (Lilith, Frozen Angel). Postie’s more town in my mind than Lilith and FA by far, Wednesday as well at least had better justification for joining the lilac wagon.

Since msgV asked for these:

Townish - Postie, Wednesday, TMWSTW
Meh - GuiltyLion, Davsto, Lilac
Scumish - Lilith, FA

In my opinion your still trying to stay in RVS. seems fairly scummy in my opinion.

What gave you this impression?

I don't see it?

[Postie]

VOTE: lilith

This is fine too.

Lilac is being very cautious, but given this is her second game, that could be awkward newbtowniness; newbscum and newbtown can be hard to tell apart. What I said in post 92 also gives me a very slight reason to townread her.

Haven't been a fan of lilith's reasoning, and her tone throughout the game has seemed overly anxious and jumpy.
Kinda like...

Spoiler:

Which is making me uneasy.

[Postie]

Posting stuff again soon.

I was the one who said this was lilac's second game, but I just checked again and it appears I messed up somewhere because she actually has 3 completed games. Either way, her join date is irrelevant.

[Postie]

I'm ill and tired so I can't respond to everything down right now, but here's... like... some brief things...

[Postie]

@postie I know I read the post. Would you mind telling me which posts of hers you perceived as not scumhunting? Or appearing to scumhunt. It was very ambiguous your post I mean.

So let me get this straight - you want me to give examples of something that doesn't exist?

Also please answer my question.

Well I'd assume the "partially random" thing meant that it wasn't fully random because she gave a reason, but it wasn't a "serious case" because the reason was an RVS-ish one. Makes sense to me and doesn't strike me as backpeddling at all.

I disagree.

Ooookay, but... why?

[Postie]

@davsto why so worried about the words/minigame?

Because I don't really want scum to get a double vote.

Shouldn't you be worrying about this in lylo, not on day 1?

[Postie]

Newbtown vs Newbscum is what's to be considered here.

I'm going to highlight this as a statement I don't like, the rest of the post is good but this gets me. From my experience, these kind of statements are made much more often by scum than town, and all they do is seed distrust in both players, with little effort on the part of the excuser. Also scum would know if we're both town and could easily set up a double mislynch with things like this.

What? I know plenty of players who say they have trouble telling newbscum and newbtown apart, myself included - in fact, I said that this was an issue I was having with lilac in 139. This is particularly a problem with newbies who are overly cautious and defensive - those are both newbscum and newbtown traits because newbies are still trying to get to grips with the game and this can make them uncomfortable and unsure of themselves, regardless of their alignment. So I think it makes a lot of sense that we're having trouble sorting lilac.

I was the one who said this was lilac's second game, but I just checked again and it appears I messed up somewhere because she actually has 3 completed games. Either way, her join date is irrelevant.

Lilac's experience can still be called into question, considering she only has 100 posts from those 3 games.

Exactly, not to mention that there's roughly a four-year gap of inactivity between those games and this one.

I want a lilac death.

I could conpromise on a lurker.

How about you actually explain your reasoning behind thinking lilac is scum coherently first?

[Postie]

Davsto usually obvtowns himself pretty quickly and I'm not feeling it this game so I'm a bit concerned on that front. I'll go into more detail tomorrow but right now my lynchpool consists of lilith, Wednesday, and Davsto.

[Postie]

I'd rather not procrastinate on taking away extra voting opportunities from scum, too.

What are you actually afraid will happen if scum get a double vote on day 2?

[Postie]

Okay, seeing as we're nearing deadline I need to start getting all my remaining words in somehow, so expect lots of weirdness from hereon. Consider this a giant pumpkin of a warning.

Yeah, I'm uncomfortable with pretty much every single person who has gotten on the lilac wagon's reasons for getting on the lilac wagon. Not a good sign.

UNVOTE:

What was your reason for being uncomfortable with FA being on lilac's wagon? Has that feeling gone away?

Hey, sorry, I'll get to this zombie question now.

I think the problem was that, initially, I didn't quite understand her reason for getting on the wagon (102). It also made me uncomfortable to see two players get on the wagon in quick succession, but that happened in a previous game I was in too and the player that was wagoned turned out to be scum, so I should probably stop caring about stuff like that.
When she later explained her reasoning further I could sort-of understand her thought process (130). Looking at Frozen Angel's ISO now, she was also suspicious of lilac as early as her 4th post, so no, I'm no longer concerned about her vote.

Also were there people you were uncomfortable with for being on/pushing the lilac wagon other than FA/Wednesday, the only others voting lilac at the time? If so, can you say who/explain why?

Hmmn, I don't think so actually. It's just Wednesday's vote that's a major concern right now and, combined with me not understanding FA's vote very well at the time, I think that might have set off loud enough alarm bells for me that it made me more suspicious of the wagon than I perhaps should have been.
It's times like this that I wish I could live in a log cabin with Leonardo DiCaprio's fuzzy cat, and be a beekeeper, or a seller of bearskin rugs.

Davsto usually obvtowns himself pretty quickly

Whether or not I turn up obvtown is really variable. But even if I did, you've only played 1 (2?) game with me, how do you "know" that I obvtown myself?

Not a fan of this post, at all.

I've played one game with you, but I've spectated at least 2 or 3 others that you were in, and you were pretty obvtown in all of them. If it helps, I can find the games for you, although I can't remember off the top of my head which ones they were; I know one was Everything Is A Lie 1.

[Postie]

VOTE: Wednesday

Well I'd assume the "partially random" thing meant that it wasn't fully random because she gave a reason, but it wasn't a "serious case" because the reason was an RVS-ish one. Makes sense to me and doesn't strike me as backpeddling at all.

I disagree.

Ooookay, but... why?

I am literally not moving vote from here until my question is answered. From my experience, if someone ignores the same question 3+ times whilst answering pretty much everything else put to them, they're scum.

[Postie]

Still not feeling very well and my brain is like jelly right now. Or maybe caramel sauce. Or a flamethrower. But here's where I'm at, even if my thoughts are a bit disjointed, incomplete, and/or stream of consciousness:

I'm liking lilith's more recent stuff and her being persistent about the questions she wanted answering. She's back in my null zone.

I'm conflicted about lilac. I really didn't like the tone of the last paragraph of 144. A lot of her posts come across as really bad play, which I don't like, but bad play doesn't make her scum. GL also made some good points for town!lilac. Something that I think looks off about the lilac wagon is that it seems the playerbase is pretty split, with everyone except me either defending or attacking her, rather than anyone being kinda null or unsure on her. I'm not really sure what conclusions to draw from that though. I'm still unsure what to make of lilac so I wouldn't be happy with her being hammered right now.

I don't like that Davsto has been contributing very minimally and it feels like he's using his focus on the wordsneak mechanic as an excuse not to scumhunt. If scum used their double vote to force a mislynch, suspicion would inevitably fall on them; town care less about looking town, so if anyone were to use the double vote irresponsibly, it would be town.

I am scumreading Wednesday and Davsto. I think vandergeist is super town, TMWSTW is town, and Frozen Angel and GuiltyLion are townleans.

@GL

- Can you link me to some past scum games? I really like a lot of your thoughts, and I'd like to see how easy it is for you to fake towny thoughts as scum.

Feel free to ask questions. Again, sorry for how I've not gone into a lot of detail here or referenced posts, which I really wanted to but I don't have the energy to go back and find stuff; I'm a little out of it right now. I'll try to dig up some posts that I wanted to comment on tomorrow so what I'm saying makes more sense.

Please don't hammer while I'm gone. Instead, you could throw glitter around or eat icecream or play with Miley Cyrus's new donkey.

[Postie]

@Postie, why do you have Vender as "super town", I currently have them at null and have trouble wrapping my head around such a strong read.

Her thought process has completely mirrored mine in most places, and comes across as town to me for that reason.

@postie that looks like a reason to park a vote. I don't think anyone says that anymore. That you won't do something unless.

Me: "I'm voting you because you're doing a ridiculously scummy thing that I've only ever seen scum do."
You: "OMG stop vote parking."
??????????????????????????????????????

The disagreement is there because I made a post describing why it was backpedaling and why that self awareness was likely scum. Was that not obvious that I disagreed? I gave you the courtesy of saying so. Tell me why I should unvote lilac postie because I have yet to see you defend them.

I... know you disagree (you said "I disagree")? That's not what I'm asking. I'm quite clearly asking you to tell me

why

you disagree with the things I explained in the post I quoted (97), hence me saying "why?". I'm baffled as to how something so simple is confusing you here.

And you still haven't explained anything.

Congrats, my vote isn't moving.

[Postie]

Just to clarify, all of my townreads are based on the assumption that I've correctly identified the scum team. They collectively have more arguments against you guys than any of you have amongst yourselves.

This is scummy

VOTE: lilac

Allows her, if her scumreads *somehow* flip town, to backtrack and start on her townreads. I really, seriously don't like that.

Acai berries are really tasty, and Davsto, do you have other reasons for voting lilac? Dolly the sheep would surely agree with me here that this isn't scummy at all; I've seen town do this plenty of times. Upsilon and confirmation bias are thing, yo.

[Postie]

Also I think they're a he.

Godammit you're right; I always get confused when someone has a female avatar but isn't female. My bad.

My issue is that I can't think of a single time they've take a hard stance on a single issue, even now they aren't voting. All they've done all game is comment on major events by saying, "yes I see the merit in both arguments, and from my own perspective it could either way, so yes in the end, it sure is a dilemma." Then they once again vanish from the game for a long period of time.

Mmmmmmmm I can kiiiiiind of see what you mean; like, vandergeist hasn't been all that agressive about his pushes, but I think he has taken a stance on a lot of things. None of which are Reese Witherspoon's Kitten.

For example...

So all we need is Postie to start pressuring on a bizzare issue and we get all this support from weak side arguments (Lilith, Frozen Angel). Postie’s more town in my mind than Lilith and FA by far, Wednesday as well at least had better justification for joining the lilac wagon.

This is taking a stance (that the support for the lilac wagon is based on weak arguments).

Townish - Postie, Wednesday, TMWSTW
Meh - GuiltyLion, Davsto, Lilac
Scumish - Lilith, FA

This is definitely taking a stance.

I could go on... (to talk about unicorns, things that are mahogany in colour, and soup.)

[Postie]

I think Wednesday did attempt to explain it though:
---snip---

That's not what I'm asking her to explain. I'm asking her to explain why she disagrees with the points I made in 97, because just saying "I disagree" isn't good enough.

[Postie]

However I just checked her ISO and I feel like she hasn't made an effort to scumhunt or ask questions in several pages.

Yep, that's another huge problem I'm having with her. She gave a single, flimsy reason for getting on the lilac wagon, and then just sat there like "*yawn* have we lynched lilac yet". I've been trying to engage with her, but nope, she just "disagrees" with what I have to say and refuses to explain why.

[Postie]

Just read Frozen's ISO, I suggest everyone should it's not long. I could go for FA lynch if we really aren't getting Lilac, they haven't done anything and their limited criticism of Lilac can almost entirely apply to themselves. Also guys, if people don't start putting more effort in day 2 I'll just policy lynch my way to LYLO.

What've you got against a Wednesday lynch?

I replaced into Newbie 1667 on Day 3 (basically Day 2 though because there was a no-lynch and no-kill), this is my only win as scum.

That's the only time I've been scum with a partner in a more conventional set up. My other two completed games as scum are:

⅋ - this was a weird setup, because Druids didn't know who the other Druids were and our win con was achieved when the other Druids died

Everything is a Lie 2 - I was a traitor this game so I didn't know who my partner was. I'm surprised you didn't mention this game, but I guess my thoughts aren't as good when I'm trying to push town!Postie

Thanks.

In EiaL2 I thought you looked town but was gut scumreading you for some reason, and in those other games you look town too (at least from a quick skim of your ISOs) but I have no idea what my read would be if I were playing. Hmmn. I'll have to reread EiaL2 and try to pinpoint what was pinging me, I think, and then read the other games again.

[Postie]

this feels lke a backoff
after everyone else starts liking man a bit more
its too artistic

What do you mean by artistic?

reaching

Why?

im all caught up
im having a hard time finding scum reads
and pages 8-9 were really messy

i really only have a few townreads

glion (see above)
man (like his rvs)
dave (gut)

id vote almost anywhere else
lical lilith and post are all fine for me

What's your read on Wednesday?

[Postie]

Lilac is probably better, flaking from this game is pretty indicative of scum.

This I also disagree with though, nobody knows why she flaked and if she never returns we have to assume her last post is frozen in time. Lurking is only scummy when you come back after lurking, if she disappears for good then who knows what happened

+1

Lilac has a history of flaking.

And that's L-1, Intent To Hammer, Wednesday please claim.

There is literally no reason to wait for a claim. We're just interested in the possibility she could be the cop, right? But if Wednesday claims cop, and she's actually the cop and we keep her alive, she'll be nightkilled. If Wednesday claims cop, and she's not the cop and the real cop counterclaims, they get nightkilled. Either way we lose our cop.
There's no point.

[Postie]

If we make Wednesday claim and they're Cop, then scum is basically forced to nightkill Wednesday and we can lynch elsewhere. Result: dead Cop, dead player of town's choosing.

Well, yeah, but the chances of Wednesday not being scum if she claims cop are like 5% at this point, IMO. I'll risk that over a 100% chance of getting our cop killed any day thanks.

[Postie]

I'm just going to paste the entirety of Wednesday's posts following my questioning here, with every time I repeated my question to her inserted in chronological order:

Spoiler:

Here's the post that started it all:

Well I'd assume the "partially random" thing meant that it wasn't fully random because she gave a reason, but it wasn't a "serious case" because the reason was an RVS-ish one. Makes sense to me and doesn't strike me as backpeddling at all.

I disagree.
Why are you voting lilac?

And here's my question:

Well I'd assume the "partially random" thing meant that it wasn't fully random because she gave a reason, but it wasn't a "serious case" because the reason was an RVS-ish one. Makes sense to me and doesn't strike me as backpeddling at all.

I disagree.

Ooookay, but... why?

Now watch:

Was watching a new hope to force awakens. Pretty awesome.

@davsto why so worried about the words/minigame?

@lillith. It was very self aware. Town don't worry about how they are perceived as scum hunting will show that you are town.

@postie I know I read the post. Would you mind telling me which posts of hers you perceived as not scumhunting? Or appearing to scumhunt. It was very ambiguous your post I mean.

@vander what is your read on lilac and explain please.

Vander reminds me of franklin from the peanuts unless I am misremembering.

@lilac why is it ridiculous?

Gonna check the mina thread for games or whatever this one is moving awfully slow. And no one is doing anything. The person being looked at has left the building it would appear. Being belligerently now we should discuss who we want lynched and who we would compromise on. I want a name none of that wishy washy shit and I want everyone to say who they'd be willing to lynch.

I want a lilac death.

I could conpromise on a lurker.

@postie I know I read the post. Would you mind telling me which posts of hers you perceived as not scumhunting? Or appearing to scumhunt. It was very ambiguous your post I mean.

So let me get this straight - you want me to give examples of something that doesn't exist?

Also please answer my question.

Well I'd assume the "partially random" thing meant that it wasn't fully random because she gave a reason, but it wasn't a "serious case" because the reason was an RVS-ish one. Makes sense to me and doesn't strike me as backpeddling at all.

I disagree.

Ooookay, but... why?

Gonna check the mina thread for games or whatever this one is moving awfully slow. And no one is doing anything. The person being looked at has left the building it would appear. Being belligerently now we should discuss who we want lynched and who we would compromise on. I want a name none of that wishy washy shit and I want everyone to say who they'd be willing to lynch.

I want a lilac death.

I could conpromise on a lurker.

Says no wishy washy shit, doesn't specify who they would compromise for.

You're supposed to read my mind. I'm okay with a davsto.

VOTE: Wednesday

Well I'd assume the "partially random" thing meant that it wasn't fully random because she gave a reason, but it wasn't a "serious case" because the reason was an RVS-ish one. Makes sense to me and doesn't strike me as backpeddling at all.

I disagree.

Ooookay, but... why?

I am literally not moving vote from here until my question is answered. From my experience, if someone ignores the same question 3+ times whilst answering pretty much everything else put to them, they're scum.

@Postie, why do you have Vender as "super town", I currently have them at null and have trouble wrapping my head around such a strong read.

I share this sentiment.

@postie that looks like a reason to park a vote. I don't think anyone says that anymore. That you won't do something unless.

The disagreement is there because I made a post describing why it was backpedaling and why that self awareness was likely scum. Was that not obvious that I disagreed? I gave you the courtesy of saying so. Tell me why I should unvote lilac postie because I have yet to see you defend them.

@Postie, why do you have Vender as "super town", I currently have them at null and have trouble wrapping my head around such a strong read.

Her thought process has completely mirrored mine in most places, and comes across as town to me for that reason.

@postie that looks like a reason to park a vote. I don't think anyone says that anymore. That you won't do something unless.

Me: "I'm voting you because you're doing a ridiculously scummy thing that I've only ever seen scum do."
You: "OMG stop vote parking."
??????????????????????????????????????

The disagreement is there because I made a post describing why it was backpedaling and why that self awareness was likely scum. Was that not obvious that I disagreed? I gave you the courtesy of saying so. Tell me why I should unvote lilac postie because I have yet to see you defend them.

I... know you disagree (you said "I disagree")? That's not what I'm asking. I'm quite clearly asking you to tell me

why

you disagree with the things I explained in the post I quoted (97), hence me saying "why?". I'm baffled as to how something so simple is confusing you here.

And you still haven't explained anything.

Congrats, my vote isn't moving.

Prod dodge been busy

Why are you nerds debating between me and lilac? You realize other players exist yes? Am still hella busy. Instead of talking yourselves to death with lilac or wednesday put others in contention to see how they react you seriously don't expect me to believe you've done nothing but argue lilac or Wednesday? Jesus.

Welcome expediance. Unfortunately I'm not so kind as others might be to give you the courtesy of an unvote. You should ask the mod for an extension by the way it would help me loads.

Like, does this make things more understandable? Because I'm not seeing how people aren't seeing Wednesday as scummy. I really hate being ignored so I'm getting really frustrated with Wednesday here and maybe that's making me slightly tunnely, idk.

P-Edit: Shit I have no idea what to make of that. Ugh. I just... I'd be fine someone just hammering right now.

[Postie]

Ninja'd

[Postie]

I've just realised I spent so much time putting fake wordsneak words into my posts that I haven't even gotten all my real ones in. Oops.

[Postie]

I thought the cut off point would be the hammer, but oh well, I'll take a crack at it just in case...
I like the words "town-sided", "crappy", "bruh", "palindrome", and "Jerry Seinfeld's Kitten" a lot and am mentioning this to you for no reason at all. I totally didn't forget to get a single one of my words in previously. These words I have just mentioned mean nothing. I promise.

Nailed it.

[Postie]

That's a hammer, right?

Well played, Davsto; that aggressively-pushing-for-the-cop-to-counterclaim thing had me convinced you weren't the cop. Otherwise I'd likely have shot you.

[Postie]

Plus, Postie is apparently

really

good as scum and I thought it'd be easier to just get that out of the way.

lol where did you hear this? I figured I'd be screwed in any game with a cop if my last scum game got out, but I thought I was safe here because I didn't think you guys had seen it.

[Postie]

Yeah, that's how I would read me too, the.

[Postie]

*tbh

[Postie]

Question to Wednesday when she gets here - how come you didn't claim cop?

[Postie]

I'd join you guys but I think I'm going to have to avoid any games with a cop in them from now on.

[Postie]

Can we take Davsto and put him in 558?

Seriously though I'm slightly confused by this statement

Postie entirely blindsided me and tore town apart after bussing titus&

LQ

EE day 1.

It was the game you saw mentioned in the Scummies thread, Davsto.

[Postie]

I might replace in if a slot opens up that's obvtown or confirmed innocent.

[Postie]

It's because I don't want to get cop checked. Unlikely as rolling scum may be, if I do I'm screwed.

[Postie]

You're not literally guaranteed to get cop checked, either.

Yeah, but the chances of me going unchecked the entire game are ludicrously low, and there's no way I'd make it out of lylo alive. I could have my partner bus me, but I feel like that's too predictable.

[Postie]

well I'm as new as you.

but played 10 times more than you!

a suggestion : never be like 100% town in your scum games. For meta sake.

I really hate meta reads ...

Yeah, definitely going to have to start changing things up somehow.

[Postie]

Hmm, I'll consider joining if I can think of a decent way of getting past the cop issue. It may not be the end of the world, but it's a serious roadblock.

[Postie]

Oh what the hell

/pre-in

I'd better be town.

[Postie]

BTW, Aero, I'm fine with the scum PT being released. There's obviously not a lot there, but you get to see me making wallpost about everyone's chances of being cop and not really reaching any conclusion other than "well it's definitely not Davsto".

[Postie]

I was genuinely considering not trying at all for the double vote so that I wouldn't look like a good target (because scum getting a double vote in lylo is basically a win).

Oh, yeah, that reminds me - Aeronaut lied, you weren't last place with the wordsneak stuff at all. I got way too caught up in the who-the-hell-is-the-cop stuff to bother, so you beat me by 6 points.

[Postie]

Probably, but, you know, you weren't

technically

last place.

[Postie]

Something tells me that won't be the case next game though.