In post 374, AlwaysInnocent wrote:What seems to be the problem?
I think the problem is pretty obvious. That vote is terrible >.>
In post 374, AlwaysInnocent wrote:What seems to be the problem?
No, it's not. It's a vote on scum.In post 375, PhantomCobalt wrote:In post 374, AlwaysInnocent wrote:What seems to be the problem?
I think the problem is pretty obvious. That vote is terrible >.>
In post 376, AlwaysInnocent wrote:No, it's not. It's a vote on scum.In post 375, PhantomCobalt wrote:In post 374, AlwaysInnocent wrote:What seems to be the problem?
I think the problem is pretty obvious. That vote is terrible >.>
Probably.In post 377, PhantomCobalt wrote:In post 376, AlwaysInnocent wrote:No, it's not. It's a vote on scum.In post 375, PhantomCobalt wrote:In post 374, AlwaysInnocent wrote:What seems to be the problem?
I think the problem is pretty obvious. That vote is terrible >.>
So I'm guessing you have a better reason than "I'm never townread by town"?
In post 378, AlwaysInnocent wrote:Probably.In post 377, PhantomCobalt wrote:In post 376, AlwaysInnocent wrote:No, it's not. It's a vote on scum.In post 375, PhantomCobalt wrote:In post 374, AlwaysInnocent wrote:What seems to be the problem?
I think the problem is pretty obvious. That vote is terrible >.>
So I'm guessing you have a better reason than "I'm never townread by town"?
It is actually an excellent vote. All the reactions I get have been worth it.In post 386, pistachi0n wrote:
....Yeah, other people have already said this is really bad, and I'm going to agree with them. This is awful. It seems like you're trying to seem like you know you're town by making enemies with someone who's townreading you. It reeks of some kind of gambit, probably scum.
In post 388, AlwaysInnocent wrote:It is actually an excellent vote. All the reactions I get have been worth it.In post 386, pistachi0n wrote:
....Yeah, other people have already said this is really bad, and I'm going to agree with them. This is awful. It seems like you're trying to seem like you know you're town by making enemies with someone who's townreading you. It reeks of some kind of gambit, probably scum.
Same explanation I gave about Cerberus.In post 390, Something_Smart wrote:AI, why are you ignoring your top townread? Please explain your read on me.
Reaction testing + voting scum.In post 389, pistachi0n wrote:In post 388, AlwaysInnocent wrote:It is actually an excellent vote. All the reactions I get have been worth it.In post 386, pistachi0n wrote:
....Yeah, other people have already said this is really bad, and I'm going to agree with them. This is awful. It seems like you're trying to seem like you know you're town by making enemies with someone who's townreading you. It reeks of some kind of gambit, probably scum.
So you were reaction testing? What have you learned?
Obviously it informed my recently updated read list.In post 394, pistachi0n wrote:I know you were reaction testing, I'm asking what you've learned from the reactions you got.
I forgot.In post 396, Something_Smart wrote:AI that reads list is so obviously half-assed that you didn't even bother to substitute in replacements.
They are not fake. To think this is a "scumclaim" is plainly absurd.Half-assing reads is basically a scumclaim because it indicates that your reads are fake.
You insist on knowing why I townread you. Scum generally don't care, like I said before. It is not so hard to understand. I think I have made this clear more than once already.What did you even say about Cerberus? Stop dodging the question and just give a few sentences explaining why you are so sure I am town.
It's a secret.In post 397, pistachi0n wrote:Okay, but what about my and other people's reactions caused you to change your reads?