There is nothing unwaveringly about it. (other than a single claim of 'too dumb for scum') you've been the only one who bothered spending even a single post, to convince me otherwise.
Hell, even shos himself only recently stopped stating explicit refusal to do so.
In post 352, shos wrote:@trow:
Anytbing? If I cannot talk the game is completely void of content?
Per your insistence: yes it is.
A lot of people aren't saying a thing because (among others) you insist, there is no point to talking (or voting 'nein' on anyone in any circumstance) in this game, until it is at least half over.
Can you give me ANY example of something worth talking about?
Anything at all would do.
Anything that would not have resulted in advising my top-scumread on which policy to enact would be better.
Anything that also wouldn't be dependent on your ability to reply, would obviously also be a requirement, given the topic.
Do you mean like HALF THE POSTS I'VE MADE THUSFAR? (and that's just pointing out YOUR scummy behavior)
Or do you mean i have to be specific about ' shos' latest ' in my previous post:
ok here goes:
In post 344, shos wrote:@trow:
1. re: getting discussion started. I don't think you understand. you are literally pushing a page 2 post that says 'people, start talking' as something serious. it isn't. it really isn't. when I say "start talking" I mean start talking, as in, get the game moving. I don't understand what you don't understand, I don't understand what you find scummy, I really just don't get what the fuck you want.
Shos tries to get town-cred for pushing the game forward with something HE DOES NOT BELIEVE TO push the game forward.
(and now tries to brush this off by doubling down on the fact: he did not actually believes, he was trying to be helpful)
2. I literally ISOed myself and looked post by post and found nothing; I ctrl+F-ed " no " "lol" "no " " no" and couldn't get it. I asked you like a billion times - PLEASE QUOTE.
Brushes off the 'refuses to answer questions', by lack of quotes of 'explicitly refused to answer questions'
but sure:
the game as a whole
here we have explicit refusal towards me directly
But lets return the question actually posed in the above.
quote, where you asked for a quote and i did not give one.
In this case, you asked me to quote, the question i was talking about (one you ignored) and i did.
and I think I understand now what you're trying to say. Basically you tell me 'why trust drench'? Well, if you don't, then you have nothing to work with, and if you do, then you do. Drench's chance of getting all-fascist draws will be clearer later on. so if you want to suspect him, do that all you want, but for then, assume better.
So it actually was your intent, to let the outcome of both investigations, ride on a single person.
and actually want no-one to oppose that notion for literally half the game (the hunt for missing liberal policies, requires we are 15 cards = 5 policies = at least half the game, in)
Also, when I said I wanted to skip klick too that was because I was partially scum reading bothhim and lilith, as you can probably see my ISO. I didn't think who the next president is going to be. that's probably why I didn't have any idea what you're talking about when you talked about Jelly.
So, you want everyone to believe, you went back to the player-list: for the express purpose of checking who the next candidate after lilith was.
For no other reason, than to already discuss that read.
But did not bother to check, who would be 'pick me, or the restless public(random-draw)' that would directly follow?
Despite the fact that, that very action, was the only way you knew Klick was the next relevant read, in the first place?
If there is anyone still out there, who still believes shos is town, but doesn't want to lift a finger to engage this discussion: the fascists salute you.
By the way, your mum says hello.
