Also:
VOTE: RadiantCowbells for reasons.
In post 196, Elyse wrote:Is that serious
In post 198, Elyse wrote:I think it's a bad vote if it's serious. And if it's not, then you should make a decent vote since there's more than enough grounds to do so.
In post 200, Elyse wrote:Yes...I'm waiting to expand on that for the time being.
You still haven't answered by original question.
In post 94, tictac wrote:In post 10, Lokiben wrote:I didn't know you were in this game...
In post 56, Lokiben wrote:that's why I invited him to join me in this game.
Yeah. That is weird.
But is it scum-weird or newb-weird?
In post 124, Lokiben wrote:Ok. If it was forced, which it wasn't, what possible scum motive could have fueled me making such an announcement? I'm completely new to this RV stage, and I was just following examples set by posts like this:
In post 160, RadiantCowbells wrote:Exactly.
Tictac is my other partner who I'm going to bus tomorrow for even more towncred.
I'm having Camn claim Doctor and Tictac claim Cop so I can out the protective and investigative PRs as I bus them so I can get rid of the PRs and easily coast to endgame.
I've pretty much already won this game to be honest. My scum play is just out of control right now.
In post 225, Elyse wrote:That vote seems more like a policy vote than a vote on someone you think is scum.
So many scummy people in this game...
In post 247, Elyse wrote:In post 226, acryon wrote:In post 225, Elyse wrote:That vote seems more like a policy vote than a vote on someone you think is scum.
So many scummy people in this game...
Well you would be wrong about that. I would educate you on what the word "ping" means in the context of mafia, but I know you already know.
I thought you'd be smart enough to infer that your use of the word ping doesn't make your vote better :/
In post 243, camn wrote:
SO TRUE. But I am with Elyse. LolJester is annoying regardless of alignment. I have played with guys like them before.. and although that playstyle is frustrating to read, its not a scumtell. And I think we aren't ready for a Cowbells policy lynch yet.In post 224, acryon wrote:It's like every game you need to put on a song and dance and then wonder why people aren't listening to you.
In post 252, RadiantCowbells wrote:Every single post by Camn pings my gut
In post 265, ika wrote:In post 264, RadiantCowbells wrote:What do you want to hear more about?
why im pining you and your neraly morriong your play in that cult game right now.......
like if your town i want to sort you if your sucm i want you lynched first
and rigth now i feel unconvinced you are town afer reading the iso
In post 312, camn wrote:Alright, its time to find tictacs partner. Ima put this down now while I have the time.
Prediction: if I actually get run up today, it will be 2 scum in the wagon, 1 or 2 off.
So lets predict. I'll start with the bottom half- they tend to get neglected.
Is it Zulfy?
I like his entry into the game actually. I don't mind the light hearted talk about chaining lynches... I think maybe I haven't caught up with the site meta yet... But to me if its too obvious, its not as scummy. He really has disappeared this last couple days though, which I want keep an eye on. Not sure..probably not tictacs partner.
Is it UpToLate?
Not enough info. Lurkerslot. Getting better.
Some random mafia player?
Maybe yes here!
My early vote was a thin, page one vote. Tictac piling on, and then the whole thing gets written off as "reaction testing" in 106 and 110. It sounds like tictac set that up in their scumchat.
And now this "lol I asked you if you were scum" nonsense... Too much distancing.
SirCakez?
This could DEFINATELY be one of tictacs off-wagon partners...maybe with the flip to on-wagon.
He just is too fixated on prompting tictac to give us a real case... Like if the wagon runs off he's ready to white-knight me. . but if it needs some help he is SO READY to "be convinced"
SilverWolf/Ika
Also to little meat here to say anything.
Cowbells?
I just think it would be so ironic and unlikely....its hard to consider at this stage in the game.
In post 319, SirCakez wrote:In post 317, curiouskarmadog wrote:In post 314, SirCakez wrote:
I wanted RC to share his case since everyone was sheeping that and he had (and still hasn't) given next to no reasons.
can you explain this a little further, where did you ask RC to share anything?
186, it was an open question for the people wagoning camn but RC was leading the wagon.
Second scum read is probably ika right now, don't like how he just came in, dropped a RC vote and left.
In post 322, camn wrote:Your face sucks.
In post 326, SirCakez wrote:In post 320, acryon wrote:What part of ika's posting do you think is scummy? Do you think his vote lacked initial/follow-up reasoning, or do you have an issue with his 1 day absence since then?
Both, he gave little reasoning with the vote and has disappeared from the thread since.
In post 329, Elyse wrote:In post 318, Lokiben wrote:In post 313, Elyse wrote:In post 309, Lokiben wrote:And you never said why you thought I was serious when I prompted you to.
I'll respond more in depth tomorrow because I'm going to sleep now but boy do I have some words.
I was asking you...because I didn't know...that's how questions work.
Serious question- Did you ever see post 231, in which I answered that already in-quote in bold? Because if not, then your 247 makes much more sense to me, as my 248 should to you.
All I see is you asking me why I thought you were serious and not answering my question...
UpTooLate wrote:Why does RC only have 2 votes? He's literally just flipflopped between Tictac and Camn, and in between joked about being scum. There is literally nothing of substance, he's just hiding behind Camn and Tictac's interaction making comments about it.
VOTE: RadiantCowbells
This vote is icky to me. The overuse of the word literally makes it seem like UpTooLate is scum who is trying to vote a townie and found reasons. A townie is "literally" doing scummy stuff everyone look!!!
VOTE: UpTooLate
Also he's perennially catching up and not posting much substance.
In post 331, Elyse wrote:cool
In post 346, camn wrote:
So look, acryon (if that is your real name!)- Maybe it doen't help YOU when I run some isos- but it helps ME.
In post 441, SirCakez wrote:Does Elyse tunnel as scum a lot? I thought that was indicative of town but if she does it as scum I might be wrong.
In post 444, tictac wrote:@acryon What's your read on Cake?
In post 446, tictac wrote:In post 445, acryon wrote:Sorry that question didn't quite work out how you wanted it to Tictac.
Nah. Aside for the false dichotomy that's a good answer.
Didn't expect you to be scumreading him after 434.
What's your read on camn?
In post 448, tictac wrote:In post 447, acryon wrote:I don't think it was a false dichotomy. You acted like you weren't at all bothered by it, but then made a point to address every little thing he mentioned. For someone who didn't think there was any pressure on him, you sure respected it a lot enough to respond as you did.
Just showing how made-up his push on me was, but I can see how you might think that.
With false dichotomy, I meant that I am not the only person who pushed him, so framing your answer as tictac vs. Cakes was kinda weird.
It's ok to scumread me, but kinda un-related to your Cake-read, don't you think?
In post 450, Elyse wrote:Pause.
ika lurks as scum.
I am 99.99% sure he is scum.
It's his biggest tell and he does it without fail.
VOTE: ika
Please follow me here. I promise.
I forgot ika was in this game until Cakez reminded me. (Cakez this will give you townpoints. Hop on!)
In post 457, tictac wrote:
I townread her strongly, and I believe meta is a valid reason to suspect someone.
In post 459, tictac wrote:In post 458, acryon wrote:In post 457, tictac wrote:
I townread her strongly, and I believe meta is a valid reason to suspect someone.
You believe it's valid enough to have literally zero other reasoning?
Yeah. Pattern recognition is where humans are strong.
If you want more then it would be stupid of her to lie about this, because it's easily and un-ambiguously checked.
In post 459, tictac wrote:And why do you strongly townread her?
Early mindset had strong feeling of 'solve the game'.
Why would she push Cake when she could have joined my wagon?
Why would she now push Ika as scum? Even if Ika is town that's still a bad lynch for scum. They could have gotten an active townie instead.
In post 465, Elyse wrote:Also if ika flips scum, acryon dies next.
There is zero reason to oppose a wagon on a lurker at this point, even if its sole purpose is pressure.