In post 7849, Drixx wrote:I may never get this chance again.
So what you're saying, Cerb, is that Lowkey has been really low key this game?
EXACTLY!!!
-Cerb
In post 7849, Drixx wrote:I may never get this chance again.
So what you're saying, Cerb, is that Lowkey has been really low key this game?
In post 7846, Klingoncelt wrote:
Everyone else:How do all of you feel about DrippingGoofball, Lowkey, and Skybird, and why?
In post 7857, ZZZX wrote:whole role card minus information.
In post 7860, Sensei wrote:In post 7857, ZZZX wrote:whole role card minus information.
What do you mean by "information?"
This is kinda important.
In post 7017, ZZZX wrote:In post 7016, Rylai and Lina wrote:and about adventure, and MC . no you won't be MC. if there is a change in MC party it won't be announced in the thread.
if you need a rolecop with full role minus flavor tell me who to target now.
In post 7857, ZZZX wrote:I'd prefer not to be stumbed as I still have... Some small cards to play
And yes u confirm that I can check the whole role card minus information. Or at least that's what varsoon said
In post 7862, ZZZX wrote:In post 7860, Sensei wrote:In post 7857, ZZZX wrote:whole role card minus information.
What do you mean by "information?"
This is kinda important.
Alignment
Also I checked and a miller state will also be tgere
In post 7864, Sensei wrote:So you can see basically their whole role card except any info that would give you definite knowledge of their alignment. IE win-con factional stuff etc.
In post 7810, Lowkey wrote:In post 7399, Skybird wrote:TCC/Cerb, you mentioned your play and Drixx' play is very similar. I was in another game with Drixx where he claimed 3rd party that can win with town. In the end, he was scum.
Everyone, I intend to vote TCC when I get home tonight if he is still alive. I'm late for work and don't have time to figure out where he is on the vote count and I don't want to accidentally hammer.
In post 7671, Skybird wrote:OK, work was hell today and I don't have time to catch up all the way. Just letting you know that I'm here and reading back on pg 303.
In post 7756, Skybird wrote:In post 7692, The Cool Cucumbers wrote:In post 7690, Klingoncelt wrote:In post 7414, The Cool Cucumbers wrote:Oooh, actually, I just had a thought! Since I realized the idea of having skybird RB us is meh if you don't think she's town(which pretty much nobody should think), How about on the nights when you don't want us to shoot anyone, we attempt to shoot skybird, and skybird roleblocks us. If anyone gets stumped other than her, then you know we betrayed you and lynch us, and it ensures she doesn't use her roleblock to stop anything else that's going on unless she wants to die herself.
That's if you don't trust skybird only, ofc.
-Cerb
pedit:
That leaves us to wonder about Zulfy.
Wasn't there a plan to have Skybird block him tonight?
There was a suggestion that skybird block me? I think it would be better if zulfy does it because it's testable then, just a superior play.
-Cerb
If I read correctly, your treestump goes through regardless of role blocks.
Changes in attitude on 3rd parties is going to take time. I for one will need to see some 3rd parties flip that definitely state they can win with town before I start believing it.
VOTE: The Cool Cucumbers
These 3 are what Skybird's been posting btw among all of the drama that's gone on. I will happily lynch Skybird too; Skybird is scum.
In post 7811, Fluminator wrote:Yes, Sky is still scum.
Busy studying for a midterm for tomorrow right now. I'd agree we should keep Cucumbers below L-2 for now.
In post 7866, ZZZX wrote:Flavor IS alignment..
In post 2842, Varsoon wrote:Scum have safe fake claims in this game with flavor that matches all of their abilities.
If there are third party factions, they have fake claims as well.
Flavor is not indicative of alignment unless otherwise written on your role card.