In post 1970, Rob14 wrote:On who? Mimi's a hard scum read if you haven't guessed.
Just your scum reads as a whole. I am having trouble finding your stance on this game.
In post 1970, Rob14 wrote:On who? Mimi's a hard scum read if you haven't guessed.
In post 1972, Nicole Mimi Tithel wrote:No. Quit fucking making plans that basically go, "powerlynch Rob if Mimi flips town", and actually explain WTF scum-Rob would have to gain by fake claiming the result. I actually am town, and I have a preeeetty decent town read on Rob. Pushing that will entirely fuck us over. I don't really care if the way he claimed was "sketch" or whatever, it's not.
From my POV, I'm town, and I'm certain Rob is town and somehow managed to get a result that was manipulated in some way. It doesn't make any sense to do it the way he did unless he's just town. And yes, if you all promise not to lynch Rob after me, I'll accept me being lynched but not a second before I'm current, I post my final catchup posts/reads, and have at least had some chance to ask/clarify w/e outstanding questions I have.
In post 1968, YT2980 wrote:I'm convinced pisskop and starbucks are scum partners.
In post 1972, Nicole Mimi Tithel wrote:No. Quit fucking making plans that basically go, "powerlynch Rob if Mimi flips town", and actually explain WTF scum-Rob would have to gain by fake claiming the result. I actually am town, and I have a preeeetty decent town read on Rob. Pushing that will entirely fuck us over. I don't really care if the way he claimed was "sketch" or whatever, it's not.
From my POV, I'm town, and I'm certain Rob is town and somehow managed to get a result that was manipulated in some way. It doesn't make any sense to do it the way he did unless he's just town. And yes, if you all promise not to lynch Rob after me, I'll accept me being lynched but not a second before I'm current, I post my final catchup posts/reads, and have at least had some chance to ask/clarify w/e outstanding questions I have.
In post 1974, Rob14 wrote:I'm tired of the attitude that people are taking attacking the claimed investigative PR instead of voting their target for easy confirmation of my role. It's just bullshit. Like, two votes would confirm that I'm a legit investigative role, because mimi is about to flip scum.
In post 1979, Flubbernugget wrote:Mimi are you advocating your own lynch? If so, what is stopping you from full-claiming?
I know I keep asking this but I want to catch you in a p-edit
In post 1984, SirCakez wrote:Beeboy is waffling more then actual waffles. Second time now he's heavily whiteknighted someone then turned around and voted them.
In post 1985, Nicole Mimi Tithel wrote:I'll probably permanently blacklist anyone who hammers prematurely, actually, and I encourage everyone else to do the same. And maybe policy lynch them after I flip.
And just so there is no accusation of "stalling", I _will_ finish within 24 hours.
In post 1975, beeboy wrote:In post 1970, Rob14 wrote:On who? Mimi's a hard scum read if you haven't guessed.
Just your scum reads as a whole. I am having trouble finding your stance on this game.
In post 1992, Rob14 wrote:In post 1975, beeboy wrote:In post 1970, Rob14 wrote:On who? Mimi's a hard scum read if you haven't guessed.
Just your scum reads as a whole. I am having trouble finding your stance on this game.
My reads are somewhat subject to change because I haven't really analyzed the NKs from Night 1 much, since the guilty thing came up.
But I expect to find scum within {Mimi, beeboy, Venmar, wguerts, Almost50, pops, pisskop}.
I consider these people town and would not lynch from within them for the foreseeable future: {YT, Suzune, Cooldog, grapes, SirCakez, Elyse, PeregrineV, T S O}
Which leaves {Not Varsoon, BRantz, Flubbernugget, Nero Cain} somewhere in the middle.
That's separating into very broad categories - townish, pure null, and scumish. Not going to be more specific on who's toward the null side of town/scum, because I don't want to make obvious who my target tonight will be, on the off chance I live.