In post 2108, Nicole Mimi Tithel wrote:
POPSOFCTOWN: I'm thoroughly meh on him. His push today re: Rob being a lyncher seems very not-what I'd expect of scum, and makes sense to me coming from town, and I've agreed with most of his positions (i.e. thinking TSO's slip was "valid enough" on D1 and his Elyse read today). None of it seems particularly unfakeable, though.
In post 2472, pisskop wrote:Theres an 100 percent chance that popso is a moron and we shouldnt be listening to the guys who's not claiming that 'lesbian' characters should be voted because they are scummy, but because they are underepresented in media.
Like lolwat Drop the part where its sexual preference and analyse what popso is saying.
In post 2476, popsofctown wrote:In post 2472, pisskop wrote:Theres an 100 percent chance that popso is a moron and we shouldnt be listening to the guys who's not claiming that 'lesbian' characters should be voted because they are scummy, but because they are underepresented in media.
Like lolwat Drop the part where its sexual preference and analyse what popso is saying.
It was literally the post before last that I specifically indicated your scumminess is 10 times more important than the flavor hunt.
I haven't seen a more glaring misrep in a while, but I'm not really sure whether it's because you don't really read the thread or because you're going for every single scummy discredit styled defense you can come up with during this gladiator duel.
In post 2109, Nicole Mimi Tithel wrote:
YT2980:
In post 519, YT2980 wrote:WTF? A lynch on the first day of the day phase when we're granted 14 days to make a decision. Granted, I got quite a bit to catch up on, and I will comment on it D2if I'm alive, but why so soon? Did he do something ridiculously scummy? If not, there's no excuse for it being this fast IMO.
*IF* this is multiball, I'm actually wondering if this post was an unintentional scum slip. I don't think town-him, knowing he almost didn't meet the experience requirement for this game and knowing he had done pretty much nothing during the day phase, would worry about being NK'ed here literally ever. I could see it coming from scum in multiball who fears a cross-kill on N1, though. This isn't something I'm really factoring into my read, it's more of a thing I'm pointing out and seeing later if I wind up being right on it.
In post 2447, SirCakez wrote:There is a lot more to comment on. What do you think of Rob, Wgeurts, Beeboy, Pops, etc? This is a super fluffy post.
In post 2486, Rob14 wrote:Mimi, look at me with a straight face and tell me that you wouldn't lynch someone you got a claimed guilty on. Stop taking cheap pot shots at me. Everyone here, yourself included, knows it's the right play for me to be pushing for your eventual death with a mod-confirmed guilty on you. Come on.
In post 2485, Maxous wrote:In post 2447, SirCakez wrote:There is a lot more to comment on. What do you think of Rob, Wgeurts, Beeboy, Pops, etc? This is a super fluffy post.
there wasn't really.
Rob and wguerts are town.
I dunno about pops yet, i'll get back to you on him.
I haven't even looked into beeboy yet...is there reason you're asking about him specifically?
In post 2490, beeboy wrote:@Sircakes
I am coasting by? Someone in this game has 3 posts and I have 207. >.<
I'd like to see an actual case from you eventually because without one I fail to see how you expect people to scum read me without one.
In post 2487, Nicole Mimi Tithel wrote:In post 2486, Rob14 wrote:Mimi, look at me with a straight face and tell me that you wouldn't lynch someone you got a claimed guilty on. Stop taking cheap pot shots at me. Everyone here, yourself included, knows it's the right play for me to be pushing for your eventual death with a mod-confirmed guilty on you. Come on.
It isn't the fact you're lynching a guilty, it's how insolent you're being over it. You haven't agreed to full claim tomorrow after getting a second result, nor have you done literally anything at all to consider what might be going on if (surprise) I'm just town here, instead handwaving it as me "trying to get you to fullclaim".
Like, yeah, you should lynch a guilty, IF you're absolutely sure you've considered every possibility and it's actually correct. You clearly haven't, and are flat-out _refusing_ to when prompted to do so.
And lol at "cheap potshots". What am I supposed to call it when _you_ snipe at _me_ saying shit like "lol take this as advice"?
In post 2488, SirCakez wrote:Yeah he's a strong scum read of mine who's coasting by. Getting nowhere near as much attention as Piss, Nicole, Pops, etc which is irritating, although some of that is understandable with the guilty and gladiate and all.
In post 2491, Nicole Mimi Tithel wrote:You haven't even stopped for half a second to realize that if your result is wrong (it is) and you keep bum rushing this, we are almost certainly entirely assfucked if we don't lynch correctly today.
I am staring into a gamestate where it's my lynch tomorrow, and yours D4, I'm town, and I'm 99% sure you are too. What the fuck are you expecting me to do, just go "lel OK"?
In post 2494, Maxous wrote:In post 2488, SirCakez wrote:Yeah he's a strong scum read of mine who's coasting by. Getting nowhere near as much attention as Piss, Nicole, Pops, etc which is irritating, although some of that is understandable with the guilty and gladiate and all.
Well I looked through his ISO then.
I would lean-town on beeboy.
though yes, it would be nice if he talked about a few more people.
In post 2493, Rob14 wrote:But if you flip scum or don't flip at all, no, I'm not going to agree to full claim tomorrow, because I can continue using my ability in an attempt to find scum. Outing would only give more information for scum to tailor their fake claims. There's no point in giving that info out with no reason.