In post 824, KainTepes wrote:
5 times already he VOTED WITHOUT REASON... its weird, usually in TOWN OF SALEM the mafia will vote without saying anything because they want to be UNDETECTED...
XTOXM YOU HAVE NOT ANSWERED MY THIS QUESTION.....
In post 824, KainTepes wrote:
5 times already he VOTED WITHOUT REASON... its weird, usually in TOWN OF SALEM the mafia will vote without saying anything because they want to be UNDETECTED...
In post 949, Ranger wrote:What.Aneninen wrote:Firstly, Ranger in her 881 is trying to convince us how obv-town she is, which I definitely don't like.
I mean, doesn't change that Iamobviously town, but I've made absolutely no effort until this post to vocalize that sentiment.
Wrong. I didn't like the conclusions. That does not mean I did not like the wall. To the contrary, it only reinforced my townread. But what I want is content from RC, rather than Raskolnikov.KainThraddash (and maybe Almost?) liked it, Ranger did not.
In post 952, KuroiXHF wrote:I don't understand why everyone is working so hard to NOT vote BC. Everyone is saying he's scummy but won't vote him. I actually feel this more or less confirms him actually being scum.
In post 953, Ranger wrote:To the contrary, I see a lot of people saying, "meh" on them and not taking a hard stance: even those who join the wagon. The people voting them don't care if they're actually lynched.Kuroi wrote:Everyone is saying he's scummy but won't vote him.
This is almost a surefire sign they are town. Which fits with my read there anyway.
In post 956, texcat wrote:My strongest scum read is still Almost50, and Acryon is the one who started the wagon on him. I'm not really feeling the Acryon lynch.
In post 959, Mad King Ashnard wrote:ayy let's lynch little miss have-my-partner-vote-me-right-after-I-declared-a-townread-on-you.
In post 967, Kop wrote:A no lynch doesn't give us any better information, but if it's a fail safe idea then it could be useful. We will have power roles that can gain us information without a lynch. We've already pressed a wagon on Burning Crystal, then moved to Kuroi, who then hinted at something, we tried to go to Aycron, and now we're onto Texcat. I've been in a few games where we no lynched day one, but still went onto win end game.
In post 972, Xtoxm wrote:There's only so many wagons we can run before we hit a VT or a CC. I think we've forced at least 1 scum into a bad claim. Removing a suspected VT is better than NL.
In post 981, KuroiXHF wrote:Hmmm... I don't suppose jail keeping the killing mafia member would save my life, would it?
In post 985, davesaz wrote:
VOTE: texcat
This may beL-1but that's based only on someone else previously reporting a L-2, and may not be correct.
In post 989, Burning Crystal wrote:Who do you think is a better place to vote then? You haven't really pushed much at all. Kop's no lynch comment is pretty scummy, I agree with Aneninen there. You also haven't tried to vote us at all, and I am the one counter wagon that might exist to you. Do you have strong town feels on us?
why are you saying your lynch won't bode well for town, as if you're not town?
Who do you think is scum and why?
In post 986, Aneninen wrote:
As for TexCat, I meant this game: Zar Show (C9++)
It's strange that neither Kop, nor Acryon has mentioned it. Both of them were there.
Going on soon.
In post 992, acryon wrote:In post 986, Aneninen wrote:
As for TexCat, I meant this game: Zar Show (C9++)
It's strange that neither Kop, nor Acryon has mentioned it. Both of them were there.
Going on soon.
I think meta generally does more harm than good, and I don't use it. I may use it as a tiebreaker in my own reads, but other than that I try to actively work against it.
I also hate Kop's no-lynch comment and would be game for a wagon on him if we could get it going. I like it better than a Tex one for sure.
In post 991, texcat wrote:My vote remains on Mad King, but my strongest scum read is still Almost50. You are correct, I have not pushed very much. Other than Almost, I am not very confident in my reads.
In post 993, Kop wrote:In post 992, acryon wrote:In post 986, Aneninen wrote:
As for TexCat, I meant this game: Zar Show (C9++)
It's strange that neither Kop, nor Acryon has mentioned it. Both of them were there.
Going on soon.
I think meta generally does more harm than good, and I don't use it. I may use it as a tiebreaker in my own reads, but other than that I try to actively work against it.
I also hate Kop's no-lynch comment and would be game for a wagon on him if we could get it going. I like it better than a Tex one for sure.
Very well. I don't see the big problem with the whole point of not wanting scum to get more PR/VT role claims. Early day, yes, late day, no.
In post 991, texcat wrote:My vote remains on Mad King, but my strongest scum read is still Almost50. You are correct, I have not pushed very much. Other than Almost, I am not very confident in my reads.