In post 1234, Ircher wrote:In post 1232, Boonskiies wrote:In post 1213, Ircher wrote:Alright, if KS & Thor believe in its validity, then I shall assume it is valid for now
UNVOTE: Guy
So, its basically no lynch or Keyser now? I want no lynch in that case
You 100% DO NOT no lynch. Lynching a VT that isn't confirmed and get INFORMATION!!!!! is 100% better than no lynching. No lynching helps nothing but scum. This is the scummiest thing you've said this game, holy crap. Lynching keyser will incriminate you and that is why you won't go there.
Exactly
Basically, I'm stuck regardless what I do.
If I vote Keyser, I get accused of backing away from my townread / trying to garner towncred
If I don't vote Keyser, then I get accused of distancing myself from the Keyser lynch.
I can't vote Guy, as the mason claim is a possibility
And there's no other wagon that is going to be big enough by deadline
So, for me, as town, the best action is to no lynch. For me, as scum, the best action is to either bus keyser if keyser is scum or to vote Keyser anyway.
Your eval of the situ holds no weight, as regardless of my action, someone (scum) is going to paint it as scummy, and I will get mislynched for it later down the road.
False. It is much more towny if you would stop the no lynch and lynch keyser. I would have personally saw you townier because of it. You purposefully trying to no lynch is painting you scum.