ChronX - 4 (JDodge, shaft.ed, theopor_COD, Rishi)
Rishi - 2 (ChronX, Dasquian)
ckillor - 1 (Max)
Dasquian - 1 (ckillor)
theopor_COD - 1 (groinhammer)
shaft.ed - 1 (ChocolateAttack)
Not Voting - TylerJ, aioqwe
Actually, in this game, a cop "innocent" result doesn't mean as much, since the cops only detect half the Mafia.theopor_COD wrote:4 people are mafia here. At the minute I don't know who they are, therefore everyone's guilty - until say a cop gets an innocent what not - its guilty until proven innocent in my book. Yeh some ppl look more guilty "scummy" than others but I wouldn't call anyone town yet, by no means.
Actually I'm voting for him for saying he was going to lurk intentionally, then getting active once called on it, but since you didn't mention me in the first place (odd)...Dasquian wrote:Though since there are two cops (one for each mafia), not even a cop result will totally clear anyone, remember.
My problem with the ChronX bandwagon is that it was just too easy - he lays into me for a semi-crap reason, everyone lays into him for being the first to put a foot out of line. It smacks of opportunism, and I find theopor and Rishi much more guilty of this than shaft.ed (who wasn't following a trend), hence my vote.
I might have done if youJDodge wrote:Actually I'm voting for him for saying he was going to lurk intentionally, then getting active once called on it, but since you didn't mention me in the first place (odd)...
There some revisionist history. You voted me during random voting for either jokey or not so jokey cross game reference purposes. You misrepresented me being huffy and posting sarcastically that I would check back in 7 pages as announcing that I was going to intentionally lurk. I WASN'T going to participate in another 7 pages of BS about stick drawings or whatever else, but I never said I was going to lurk once people decided to play, nor have I.JDodge wrote:Actually I'm voting for him for saying he was going to lurk intentionally, then getting active once called on it, but since you didn't mention me in the first place (odd)...Dasquian wrote:Though since there are two cops (one for each mafia), not even a cop result will totally clear anyone, remember.
My problem with the ChronX bandwagon is that it was just too easy - he lays into me for a semi-crap reason, everyone lays into him for being the first to put a foot out of line. It smacks of opportunism, and I find theopor and Rishi much more guilty of this than shaft.ed (who wasn't following a trend), hence my vote.
If you think I'm going to let something that happened in a different game influence this, you may kindly not let the door hit you in the ass on the way out, because I'm not going to stand for this bullshit for the entire game.ChronX wrote:There some revisionist history. You voted me during random voting for either jokey or not so jokey cross game reference purposes. You misrepresented me being huffy and posting sarcastically that I would check back in 7 pages as announcing that I was going to intentionally lurk. I WASN'T going to participate in another 7 pages of BS about stick drawings or whatever else, but I never said I was going to lurk once people decided to play, nor have I.JDodge wrote:Actually I'm voting for him for saying he was going to lurk intentionally, then getting active once called on it, but since you didn't mention me in the first place (odd)...Dasquian wrote:Though since there are two cops (one for each mafia), not even a cop result will totally clear anyone, remember.
My problem with the ChronX bandwagon is that it was just too easy - he lays into me for a semi-crap reason, everyone lays into him for being the first to put a foot out of line. It smacks of opportunism, and I find theopor and Rishi much more guilty of this than shaft.ed (who wasn't following a trend), hence my vote.
Now, let go of your grudge from another game and stop trying to frame me in this one. Its not very pro-town to cross-game in that way.
But by reacting that way you're impugning your own neutrality. I know it's easier from my perspective since I haven't ever really played with ChronX, but I don't think reacting that harshly reflects well.JDodge wrote:It's more that people trying to impugn my neutrality really, really piss me off.shaft.ed wrote:Looks like some people woke up on the wrong side of the bed this morning.
When did you push his button. Do you have an alt or something?TylerJ wrote:rishi you don't know that
Jdodge you know that he wasn't saying he was going to lurk. From what I see, he was joking while trying to make a point.I was pushing his buttonto see his reaction, not because it was worth mentioning.
vote: Jdodge
I was focusing more on immediate reactions. Rishi unvoted dasq versus you voting CronX. In that sense your action was more aggravated... However, after Rishi voted Cronx it was a bit more aggravated...shaft.ed wrote:aioqwe wrote:And how is my vote more aggrevated than Rishi's? Mine came when ChronX only had one other vote on him, Rishi's made ChronX the most popular bandwagon thus far.
yeah something about it doesnt seem quite right. it's off puttingaioqwe wrote:
I really don't like the back-and-forth between Jdodge and Cronx...
Isn't this logic a bit weak and Hasty?Chocolate Attack wrote:Sorry for took this long to make another post but i try my best already. Anyway, nice that we moving out of the random voting stage. I think ChronX action is explainable and i think he is town. On another hand, shaft.ed logic is weak and hasty so i will place my vote on Shaft.ed for now.
vote:Shaft.ed