Mini 1763 - Game OV

[Not_Mafia]

VOTE: Carex

[Ircher]

Yep, this game is dead.

We might as well lynch Soap, not that it really matters....

[Boonskiies]

People are just done with this day phase.

[Ircher]

Everyone vote soap

[Not_Mafia]

VOTE: Palmolive

[Ircher]

.................................

Where's our mod?

This game is borin' cuz the mod won't prod the lurkers.

I'm considering replacing out if this keeps up.

[Ircher]

I will try to do actuAl stuff for this game tommorrow. Even with all the lurkers....

[ChaosOmega]

Votecount 2.04

MarioManiac4 (4) - KainTepes, Garmr, Boonskiies, Not_Mafia
Soapbar (3) - MarioManiac4, Performer, Ircher
Katsuki (1) - droog
Performer (1) - Katsuki

Not Voting (2) - Soapbar, Lapsa

With 11 alive, it takes 6 to lynch.

Apologies for lack of modding. Will be looking for someone else to moderate if this continues.

Deadline extended a day, and prodding droog and Soapbar.

Deadline: (expired on 2016-03-22 21:40:38)

[Not_Mafia]

VOTE: Imperial Leather

[Boonskiies]

Just lynch Mario and tomorrow will be a new day.

[MarioManiac4]

Just lynch Mario and tomorrow will be a new day.

A new day following another mislynch, which was reasoned by "GUTZ"

[KainTepes]

who is IMPERIAL LEATRHER

[Soapbar]

sorry for not being around, sickness makes me want to sleep all day and forget I have a mafia game to be playing.

[MarioManiac4]

sorry for not being around, sickness makes me want to sleep all day and forget I have a mafia game to be playing.

pls claim scum

[Ircher]

Spoiler: Mini 1763 - MM4 ISO

1. Mario's RVS vote of Kein seems to become serious in 79 because of: 1) Flailing/AtE; 2)OMGUSing MM4 for wagon related stuff and 3) Saying its a huge tell in ToS. -

This just reads opportunistic to me. 2 of the 3 arguments are totally irrelevent as Kein is new to this site & its meta. The other argument may or may not be alignment indicative for Kein. Probably not. Anyway, considering the earlier questions asked by Kein & Mario's responses, I think MM4 had a good idea of who he was dealing with; aka, he didn't make this accusation without knowing Kein's playstyle. Therefore -

Scum-Indicative

2. Doesn't post for 3 days between 187 and 275 -

He should've been prodded. -

Null-Indicative

3.275, Mario basically decides to fence sit. In 327, he states that he concurs with Soap's 325 -

I'll probably look at Soap next, but I can start to see a pre-flip association between Soap and Mario. I kinda agree that none of the wagons were good at this point, but also wonder if this is a tactic that Mario (and Soap) are using to try to avoid attention. Possible Scum Plan --> Fence sit til a good wagon forms then creep way on to it while trying to be avoid being called opportunistic. Well, I'd best keep reading til I make too hasty assumptions. -

Null-Scum Indicative

4. 488 is a bit weird. States "I WILL TAKE ANYONE ONLINE NOT VOTING IRAON AS BLATANTLY SCUMCLAIMING" -

And what was the reasoning behind such a claim. Since Iran flipped town, it's harder to say that you knew Iran's alignment (if Iran was scum, I would prob. lynch you for this statement alone). Nonetheless, I get scum-vibes here. I really am trying to be unbiased, but your ISO seems to be plagued with scum-motivated activities; my apologies. -

Null-Scum Indicative

5. A lot of his D2 posts are defensive in nature. -

Not alignment indicative -

Null-Indicative

6. Posts a readlist in 791 -

I like the readlist. Probably the most town-looking thing he has done in this game. -

Town-Indicative

The ISO read comes out as rather scummy and a lot of the D1 stuff is scum-motivated whereas D2 is defensive null stuff.

Yet, something tells me that unless there's 4 scum, Mario's prob. town for idk (gut?) reasons. Just, his more recent D2 posts seem to show a shift in perspective. I don't think I'd be comfortable with a Mario lynch tbh.

[MarioManiac4]

1. Mario's RVS vote of Kein seems to become serious in 79 because of: 1) Flailing/AtE; 2)OMGUSing MM4 for wagon related stuff and 3) Saying its a huge tell in ToS. -

This just reads opportunistic to me. 2 of the 3 arguments are totally irrelevent as Kein is new to this site & its meta. The other argument may or may not be alignment indicative for Kein. Probably not. Anyway, considering the earlier questions asked by Kein & Mario's responses, I think MM4 had a good idea of who he was dealing with; aka, he didn't make this accusation without knowing Kein's playstyle. Therefore -

Scum-Indicative

the first is something that comes from panicking scum, the second is scum-movitated and the third is not truthful.

3.275, Mario basically decides to fence sit. In 327, he states that he concurs with Soap's 325 -

I'll probably look at Soap next, but I can start to see a pre-flip association between Soap and Mario. I kinda agree that none of the wagons were good at this point, but also wonder if this is a tactic that Mario (and Soap) are using to try to avoid attention. Possible Scum Plan --> Fence sit til a good wagon forms then creep way on to it while trying to be avoid being called opportunistic. Well, I'd best keep reading til I make too hasty assumptions. -

Null-Scum Indicative

And what evidence is there that this is the case? You're saying "oh two scum decided to have exactly the same gameplan d1 and then bus d2" and I'm just not getting it.

4. 488 is a bit weird. States "I WILL TAKE ANYONE ONLINE NOT VOTING IRAON AS BLATANTLY SCUMCLAIMING" -

And what was the reasoning behind such a claim. Since Iran flipped town, it's harder to say that you knew Iran's alignment (if Iran was scum, I would prob. lynch you for this statement alone). Nonetheless, I get scum-vibes here. I really am trying to be unbiased, but your ISO seems to be plagued with scum-motivated activities; my apologies. -

Null-Scum Indicative

The reasoning should be obvious. A d1 nolynch is the worst-case scenario for Town.

[Not_Mafia]

Scum caught for wrong reasons?

Still can't shake this feeling

[MarioManiac4]

Scum caught for wrong reasons?

Still can't shake this feeling

No. Mislynches=bad. If I am mislynched in the place of confirmed scum, me=sad.

[Not_Mafia]

Well I did vote soapbar multiple times

[Ircher]

Spoiler: Mini 1763 - Soap ISO

1. At 391 (3 days til deadline) and

Soap hasn't seemed to make a serious post yet in this game.... - I'm taking this alignment indicative this time if you cannot provide something that isn't a joke or a defense about a joke within a week's time -

Scum-Indicative

Soap's ISO is too shallow. It's basically RVS, jokes, exaggerated defense about a joke he made, (fake?)alarm at deadlines, and being sick. Newsflash : If you were feeling sick & didn't feel well enough to post, you should prob. replace out. I'm not questioning whether you were or not (I'd imagine you were), but I am questioning why you didn't replace out or do V/LA if you knew you weren't feeling very well & were't able to participate.

Combined with Lapsa's guilty & the zero scumhunting, I think this lynch will probably flip scum.

@Mario
On the other hand, I am unwilling to lynch you cuz as I commented, something tells me it is unlikely you are scum. I think it has to do with Lapsa's association case on you.

[Ircher]

Not Mafia

All I see is naked votes, quote walls, and 1-liners and zero explanations. I didn't bother reading each post as it is quite evident to me you aren't putting forth effort to this game.

Scumread.

[Not_Mafia]

tl;dr

[Soapbar]

Spoiler: Mini 1763 - Soap ISO

1. At 391 (3 days til deadline) and

Soap hasn't seemed to make a serious post yet in this game.... - I'm taking this alignment indicative this time if you cannot provide something that isn't a joke or a defense about a joke within a week's time -

Scum-Indicative

Soap's ISO is too shallow. It's basically RVS, jokes, exaggerated defense about a joke he made, (fake?)alarm at deadlines, and being sick. Newsflash : If you were feeling sick & didn't feel well enough to post, you should prob. replace out. I'm not questioning whether you were or not (I'd imagine you were), but I am questioning why you didn't replace out or do V/LA if you knew you weren't feeling very well & were't able to participate.

Combined with Lapsa's guilty & the zero scumhunting, I think this lynch will probably flip scum.

@Mario
On the other hand, I am unwilling to lynch you cuz as I commented, something tells me it is unlikely you are scum. I think it has to do with Lapsa's association case on you.

I only caught this flu about, I dunno, 10 days ago (I've had it since last Saturday), so It's not like I've had it since the start of the game.

[Ircher]

But, having been able to post during that time, why didn't you replace out? As scum, that makes sense. As town, not so much.

[Not_Mafia]

Because he didn't want to? That's really none of our business