In post 353, acryon wrote: In post 350, Garmr wrote:
It's not contrived but you are entitled to your opinion. But do you feel it's actually scummy and how do you feel when you look at my content as a whole?
When I look at your content at a whole, I don't feel like you are scum, but I do understand why MURDERCAT took issue with that post.
In post 352, Garmr wrote:
Yes I was going to post my gut feeling on him being scum till he ninjaed me.
Were there certain posts that pinged you?
Oh boy let me show you why that little fucker is scum
Look at that beta male behavior backing off his reasoning.
In post 48, MURDERCAT wrote:@Jake
Sounds like you're setting yourself up to coast and hoping we all give you a pass.
Throws out a random bs accusation
Instead of following up on his so called scum read next post he bitches out and then votes this
In post 194, MURDERCAT wrote:I don't really know what to make of garmr v. lapsa either, not sure if I'm feeling the lapsa hate although I genuinely don't understand how you don't understand RC's vote if you actually read.
Anyway,
VOTE: BananaCucho for naked vote and unvote 12 hours later despite apparently reading everything and there being enough to comment on.
In post 197, MURDERCAT wrote: In post 73, nnn_thekushmountains wrote:jarjar makes good points.
VOTE: acyron
The reason why I was excited it because it was scum last game and I do not like being scum.
In post 104, nnn_thekushmountains wrote:haha yeah... voted for whatshisname without actualyl reading anythign he wrote. But jarjardrinks points against him looked pretty good.
But whathisname defense looked pretty good as well. In fact it made jarjar look kind of bad for the misrepresentation.
So I'll
UNVOTE: whathisname.
Real talk: there's been a lot more activity so far than I was prepared for. So I kinda just did some dumb shit to be invovled. I'm going need some time before I can read everything closely and have good opinions.
Are you even paying attention to what's going on? A vote on acyron then unvoting whathisname?
Has anyone commented on this yet?
VOTE: Kush
Votes kush says this despite actually being the 5 vote on the wagon. Putting him at l-2 seems fake as fuck because his been keeping up with the game.
In post 271, MURDERCAT wrote:Lol at 269. Lapsa seems to have trouble following along. Not sure if scum or bad but anyway Kush isn't here so I'll
VOTE: lapsa. No one else is sticking out.
Talking about shit fake post what the hell is with this reasoning he ignores all the other scummy stuff lapsa is doing and then votes him for not being able to follow the game that's fucking shit reasoning and horrible.
