Imperium wrote:UM I'm not exactly sure why you think linking games neither of us have been in is proof that we're scum because I think you writing numbers at the bottom with miminal minutes in between looks fake.
I can't exactly link to ongoing games (even ones I've flipped in), now, can I?
(I, uh...can't do that, right? I'm pretty sure I can't, anyway. If I can, then I would.)
The point wasn't "Imperium has seen these games, and should know better".
It was, "Imperium has seen this behavior before, and should know better." The games being unrelated is an unfortunate side-effect of site rules.
Also Ranger if you really are reading Snarky as scum and you want it to be believed, you could actually say I don't know point out the stuff in the posts he's making in this game.
Well I'm probably not the best one for that. Others have done it already and did so quite well, namely, RadiantCowbells. I thought jmo's behavior was suspicious. I think SnarkySnowman's behavior this game matches his scum game. His activity is about the same both as town and as scum, but what content he provides differs slightly. The readslists such as
528, done as a poor Ranger imitation, are something I associate more with his scum game; if he were town, I would actually expect something less concrete. There's also how much content he is giving. Ironically, too much: walls like
613 are also more common in his scum game than his town game. There is also who he is pushing, but RadiantCowbells covered that fairly clearly.
It would be much easier to talk about this given an extra week or so.
I've never WOTC'd before, but I will probably be WOTCing her in any games she signs up for if I'm already in them if this is actually how she plays. I've never witnessed a more atrocious town play and I've seen some pretty bad ones.
I know this is probably not alignment indicative.
But I absolutely
hate
it when someone says this.
You say that the majority of our iso is about snarky, so apparently we didn't back off.
The majority of your iso can revolve around a player even if you back off from that player. When said player is the counterwagon to another wagon, and you start heavily pushing the other wagon, your iso is still revolving around that player. But as noted already, I semi-retracted the point.
Do you think this is out of the realm for what Nacho and I would do as town?
No, which is a good reason for this back-and-forth to end soon.
I should also mention: the only thing keeping me from hard-scumreading Virtue is that I'm pretty sure I know who Virtue is and if they're scum I'm pretty sure I almost always read them as scum regardless of their alignment.
