In post 285, Antihero wrote:is zakk usually this cloyingly shitick-ish?
Anti's asking about Zakk in the first post. Asking about his "meta." And then, in the second post, saying he's got a meta-based read on Zakk.In post 347, Antihero wrote:if you read my comments about zakk, you could probably glean from context that it's a meta-based read since i mentioned a previous game and mentioned that he put different levels of effort into being charismatic in both these games. i also have a couple reads in my back pocket that i'm holding off on even introducing to the threat yet (precisely because i can't articulate them and dont know if they're shit or not; this is why i said i have a "couple" ideas for shots).
if you asked me to elaborate on my zakk read, i could site specific posts (like Post 76 and Post 238) that pinged me. i wouldn't just say "welp, i just think he's scum." and i haven't done that.
So, what's up with that? You know his meta or don't you?