I gotta say Godz, I thought Anti was being more of the jeck in that exchange with you earlier, but you certainly seem to be trying to give him a run for his money with some of your recent stuff.
G[o wrote:dz post_id=7944021 time=1464128869 user_id=15399 post_num=1167]
In post 1101, Axelrod wrote:The way he intervened on Anti-Hero's behalf and his efforts over multiple posts to convince Godz of the error of his ways just felt weird and off.
Why?
This is going to be more of an answer than you probably want to hear. I actually went even more into this in the nit-picky post I didn't post, but, okay, it's like this:
If I'm Town, and I see a hostile exchange between two other players - and this was a pretty hostile exchange which escalated pretty quickly I think we can agree - and I also happen to think that both of the players involved in this hostile exchange are town - I don't do what Nacho did. Not the way he did it.
I might conceivably try and intervene. I might say something like "guys, guys, take it easy...." "This looks like a big misunderstanding to me....""Hey, (X), I think you're reading this wrong."; "(Y), I think you're over-reacting here...." etc. etc. I would
also
indicate that I was reading them both as Town, and I think that's rather important for people to understand where I'm coming from. This was not what Nacho did.
Nacho came in and talked exclusively to you. He told you your accusations were not fair. He agreed with Anti about (some post or other). He said he understood why Anti was getting so upset with what you were posting.
None of this went the other way as far as I could see. I did not see him trying to mediate with Anti. Telling him he was out of line or wrong about something he said about you. He was not trying to convince Anti that you were town. The whole thing was very one-sided, and for the life of me I would never have got the impression that he was town-reading you for it. Not the way he was posting. I would have rather got the other impression, except he wasn't exactly attacking you either. It was like he was just trying to shoot you down, and leave it at that. That is what I mean when I say his intervention was weird and off. I did not understand the purpose of it. I did not see the Townie motivation. I like to consider myself reasonably good at getting into other people's headspaces when trying to divine their motivations for posting, and I was not getting this.
Then he explained it and the explanation didn't seem to fit the behavior.
In post 1101, Axelrod wrote:And then, when asked to explain why he was doing it, he said he was strongly Townreading Godz and was concerned about making Godz a more electable King in the future. Which, again, is just a weird and strange thing to say.
Why would he say that as scum if he didn't really think that's how he'd approach the game as town? i.e. He could have easily just said something like, "I think they're town and I want to stop in-fighting," or something along those lines and nobody would have batted an eye.
Ultimately, either it's something he's saying because he genuinely believes it's a good thing to do as town in this setup or it's something he's saying as scum because he genuinely believes it's a good thing to do as town in this setup.
I've never really understood this as a point against him.
Okay, the thing here is, obviously you make posts as scum that you *think* you would make if you were town. Everyone tries to do that. It's the name of the game. Some people are better at it than others. So the point of "why would he say that as scum" has never resonated very well with me. I think your suggestion here, of what he might have said, makes a lot more sense, yes. That might, indeed, have looked less suspicious. But he didn't say that. And you going, well, he
could
have said this other thing which wouldn't have sounded as suspicious, so the fact he didn't means he's less likely to be scum is just silliness to me.
I can easily see him (as scum) feeling like he was getting bogged down in that discussion with you, realizing that maybe he wasn't coming off so well, and looking for an exit strategy. And this whole thing where he (in my opinion) somewhat abruptly states that he's townreading both of you and thinks that changing your mind will make you a more electable king (again, it's very one-sided. He's not trying to make Anti more electable?) could just be something he came up with more or less on the fly.
In post 1101, Axelrod wrote:Usually you don't develop super-town reads on people who are making bad/misguided attacks.
This... isn't at all true.
Yes it is?
I mean, I fully get that you can get a town read on someone who's making a terrible case, but I do not think that's the typical situation.
I do not really find this concerning. Perhaps it would be in a regular setup (and even then, not so much), but this isn't exactly a regular setup. Do you think he's the sort of player who would have difficulty pretending to scum hunt as scum?
I also do not really have an issue with him qualifying his Skybird read and I don't really see why you do.
I don't know what sort of player he is. Is anyone that sort of player? i don't demand he have a fully formed comprehensive set of scum reads at all times, but if he's giving his reads and they're as weak as the ones he gave, I can take notice of that. I do think that scum are more likely to throw out a poor/lazy list of scum reads under pressure. Because they're afraid of giving something away.
In post 1101, Axelrod wrote:It also feels like since he's been coming under suspicion he has dramatically reduced his posting.
I don't think this is game-specific.
In post 1101, Axelrod wrote:I also don't like his saying he won't be claiming today, and he left without answering my question of "why" he won't claim if it looks like he's the target.
I am not sure what scum motivation you think there is here. Unless you're just suggesting that he's scum saying that because he thinks it benefits him in some way?
I think ducking out under pressure is also scummy. Maybe it's totally just a coincidence that he disappeared right after I asked him a question and hasn't been back since. Maybe he's got IRL issues. But I have no reason to give him that benefit of the doubt. I also note that since he's stopped posting, more than one person has come to his defense here, so, were I scum, I might very well decide that not posting was actually working out better for me.