VOTE: ASPIn post 622, MURDERCAT wrote:vote asp so KTS can hammer scum again.
GG
Useful vote.
Yes I wanted an Asp lynch.In post 635, Vedith wrote:Useful vote.
However, talk to me about the wagon. I think the wagon was ridicules to not have a counter. You were obviously first on the wagon, so did you actually want the lynch on ASP at that point (no so quickly, but in mindset)? Do you think he had scum on his wagon?
The reason I'm asking you this is because you ahve shown concern to the lynch but haven't continued with it.
Why do you think that scum didn't think of it as a tracker / PR?
So by this, you think that Bella is scummy, right?In post 554, The_Jester wrote:This response to ASP's case is even more scummy imo
Do you think you should be thought of as helpful town for voting there?In post 645, The_Jester wrote:Speaking of involvement, I've lynched scum and Murder- who accuses me of "doing nothing"- has only managed to mislynch an inactive townie whilst encouraging a quickhammer with no danger of hitting the deadline. Hypocrisy at its best.
And yes, I'd like to lynch Bella but she doesn't seem to be present atm and I don't wanna see another quicklynch.
Considering this was your vote. You would have voted any where, right? Keep in mind at this stage Nacho and Dragon were both on L4 (no real risk).In post 420, The_Jester wrote:Yup still confused.
VOTE: DoTW
I'm a sheep.
Plus the only thing he posted is excuses for inactivity, misreading and fluff (just like me, huh?)
You tell me. What I think is I shouldn't be called useless.
I could've also unvoted later on which I didn't cause I was confident in that wagon.
He has 1 vote as of yet so no I don't think he'll get quicklynched. And Bella hasn't posted in almost 4 full days.In post 646, Vedith wrote:Why do you think that she could be quick lynched and KTS won't be? I mean, Bella isn't V/LA or anything, right?