Mini 1826: The Purge - Game Over

[Vedith]

I hinted at long time ago, I think both {lane,shos} is either both town or both scum. So {lane,shos,???}. With epod have not making any comment, it's dumb to annouce the 3rd scum now.

It's pretty dumb to announce the second scum now, so why not the 3rd?

[Realeo]

I hinted at long time ago, I think both {lane,shos} is either both town or both scum. So {lane,shos,???}. With epod have not making any comment, it's dumb to annouce the 3rd scum now.

It's pretty dumb to announce the second scum now, so why not the 3rd?

You think it's dumb to announce the second scum after

21

pages?

I tell you what is dumb. Lane forcing me to make a read out of RVS.

[Vedith]

You think it's dumb to announce the second scum after 21 pages?

I tell you what is dumb. Lane forcing me to make a read out of RVS.

I think saying "they are scum together" is dumb.
I don't think that requesting a read is a scum tell, but do go on.

[Realeo]

I literally explained it like a long time ago?

I mean, kraska literally pointed out the same thing.

Why is trying to sort more than one slot scummy?

the thing is, i dont see you really sorting your scumread?
your push on shos is barely there
youre more focused on realeo
and your push on shaddow is disingeneous bc moi and kuroi also announced vlas

The fact that I'm not alone means I'm not making nonsense. Wrong? Probably. Nonsense? A second pair of eye confirms my observation.

[shaddowez]

I tell you what is dumb. Lane forcing me to make a read out of RVS.

Isn't that the point of RVS? If nobody ever made reads out of RVS, RVS would never end.

[Vedith]

The fact that I'm not alone means I'm not making nonsense. Wrong? Probably. Nonsense? A second pair of eye confirms my observation.

So if one other person has the same opinion as you, it can't be wrong?
Am I really reading this right?

[Realeo]

I tell you what is dumb. Lane forcing me to make a read out of RVS.

Isn't that the point of RVS? If nobody ever made reads out of RVS, RVS would never end.

Read the context of the exchange. I was meta-checking how pisskop react on RVS. lane asked my why I don't make a read out of RVS.

How do I make a meta read out of

past

RVS? I have meta read people for past game and lynch them sucessfuly with correct meta read, but I meta it as a context as a whole, not strictly RVS.

The context of the exchange was I was meta checking only RVS. How do I make a read out of

past

RVS.

[Realeo]

In post 503, Realeo wrote:
The fact that I'm not alone means I'm not making nonsense. Wrong? Probably. Nonsense? A second pair of eye confirms my observation.


So if one other person has the same opinion as you, it can't be wrong?
Am I really reading this right?

I am saying that if other person has the same opinion, it means I passed the sanity check. It's a valid argument.

[Realeo]

Unless you are going to rebutt it, be my guest.

[lane0168]

I literally explained it like a long time ago?

I mean, kraska literally pointed out the same thing.

Why is trying to sort more than one slot scummy?

the thing is, i dont see you really sorting your scumread?
your push on shos is barely there
youre more focused on realeo
and your push on shaddow is disingeneous bc moi and kuroi also announced vlas

The fact that I'm not alone means I'm not making nonsense. Wrong? Probably. Nonsense? A second pair of eye confirms my observation.

Holy deflection batman! How did kraska say the same thing as you saying its crazy that I expected a read. I asked you what was the point of doing the meta, if you weren't looking for a read? The whole point of meta is to try to sort your reads. You did it seemingly for no apparent reason. And why are you bringing it up again now? That's been long over and you're still trying to defend it for some reason

[lane0168]

I hinted at long time ago, I think both {lane,shos} is either both town or both scum. So {lane,shos,???}. With epod have not making any comment, it's dumb to annouce the 3rd scum now.

It's pretty dumb to announce the second scum now, so why not the 3rd?

You think it's dumb to announce the second scum after

21

pages?

I tell you what is dumb. Lane forcing me to make a read out of RVS.

I don't even see kraska having the "same opinion" as you. That you think I'm scum for thinking the point of meta is to get a read?

[lane0168]

On another point, lane, why do you insist that I should make a read out of meta? Especially from RVS. The scope of RVS is so narrow that I don't recall people make a

genuine

read out of it.

I didn't insist you make a read. I asked what was the point of doing an RVS and what you are even looking for if not to find a read.

[Realeo]

I'm not saying pointing a meta to get a read is scummy.

I'm saying collaborately sorting your non-scumread (and I quote "I just played with Realeo. Hard to understand and definitely seems try hard as town. I mostly ignored him that game.") with the help of the person that you were voting is a weird dynamic.

Sorting your non-scumread with another person, been there, done there.

Sorting your non-scumread with your scumread, raises eyebrow.

pedit: considering the context, that is potentially legit explanation. I will consider dropping you of the list after I sleep. 10.30 pm in my country.

[pisskop]

lane why are you still on kraskow?

[pisskop]

i mean, besides them being a lurkish spectator

[lane0168]

I guess you forget about me telling shos to stay out of it and not weasel into my line of questioning. My "don't you steal my line of questioning line!" that got its own share misconstrued reaction.

Pedit. Because I don't like the naked vote on me followed by a Mish mash of pick and choosing things to make a case after deciding to make a case on me. And because her big town apology that I think is scum seeing a case go nowhere and a cop out.

[lane0168]

Her excuse was that she skims and misses things. Funny she "misses" the things that make me more town, but finds plenty of things she finds scummy

[pisskop]

Im kind of leaning scum on her.

[kraska77]

Shoot me then ^_^

[pisskop]

I may. I just may

[lane0168]

Shoot me then ^_^

Why do you think you missed the thing that cleared me and shadow for you, twice, but find plenty of scum things

[Almost50]

Fine. I read a few posts, realized we're still debating a shooting plan, so I skipped the rest (I repeat: I skiPPed, not skiMMed. i.e. didn't bother to read at all).

So, one stranded and 6 shooting 6. If there's any scum in the 6 being shot they'd be forced to hold fire so as not to get killed. However, if there's any scum in the shooters they may opt to shoot someone else to implicate one of the townies in the 6 shooters.

But now I do have a problem: what about the STRANDED?? What if that's the STRONGMAN (in which case they're still able to shoot anyway). Doesn't that add MORE COMPLICATIONS to what already looks like a fragile plan??

[pisskop]

6 is too large a group.

we risk everyone not shooting the same person.

Town guided kills should trump locking down scum.

4 scumspects, 1 stranded.

[pisskop]

Do you hillary me?

[PeregrineV]

@Shos

- the issue with 6 shooting 6 scummy is that

1. We have to have enough agreement from everyone on who the 6 scummy are
2. Everyone has to shoot thier assigned person with no deviation.

The issues are

1. We have a hard time agreeing on a single person to lynch, so anything less than 12 people agreeing on the 6 scummiest means the plan breaks down.
2. There is no enforcement mechanism since the lynch is not even that.

Given that, it would be easier to fuck with the plan overall, reducing it's effectiveness.

Probably just going to go with he whole shoot who I think it scum tonight, and maybe see what happens tomorrow.