The Walking Dead Season 1 Finale (GAME OVER)

KuroiXHF · Post Post #2350 (ISO) » Mon Sep 05, 2016 10:13 am

In post 2347, Wisdom wrote:
In post 2346, KuroiXHF wrote:Is this a surprise to anyone?
What do you mean? You expected him to flip doc?

I expected him to be town. As I've said before, Ank is easy enough for me to read from my experience with him.

In post 2349, Wisdom wrote:or rather, you quoted mollie's yet said nothing about it

I don't think I really owe anything to Mollie. She stopped making sense to me yesterday.

KuroiXHF · Post Post #2351 (ISO) » Mon Sep 05, 2016 10:13 am

And what's this about SirCakez? I must have missed it.

Wisdom · Post Post #2352 (ISO) » Mon Sep 05, 2016 10:15 am

mollie claimed bodyguard. How does that not make sense to you? She claimed something that self resolves, does that not fit?

Cakez claimed he has something that makes Peregrine 85% likely to flip scum.

KuroiXHF · Post Post #2353 (ISO) » Mon Sep 05, 2016 10:17 am

85%, eh? I suppose I'll have to go back.

ISO · Post Post #2354 (ISO) » Mon Sep 05, 2016 10:25 am

In post 2314, Wisdom wrote:That's what I and Magna argued about the Maxous wagon too and yet it was wishful thinking

True

In post 2317, Wisdom wrote:I agree with the above

I dont see why you dont just claim so we can decide for ourselves if your result is really a guilty. Theres even a bodyguard to protect you if needed.

Because my role will become basically useless if claimed

In post 2338, pirate mollie wrote:
In post 2313, SirCakez wrote:The fact people are dragging their feet so much is a good sign
I am not dragging my feet, you said to wait for perv so I am waiting for perv. plus I am not in a rush. I am still sorting the game with the new info that I have.

This is fine
I was more referring to the people just completely dodging the discussion on PV

In post 2341, Young and Witless wrote:
In post 2335, farside22 wrote:
In post 2331, Dwlee99 wrote:oh what
I thought cakez was softing gunsmith
wtf??
You can't be serious.

I'm not sure why players have this paranoia about sir cakez claim without waiting for Pere to claim first.
Whomever is demanding a claim on sir want to explain why Pere shouldn't claim first?
Common sense.

Cakez is giving himself a huge out here. He already admitted that there is a 15% chance that Peregrine could be town.

If Cakez's result is as damning as he seems to think it is (while simultaneously acknowledging that there's a decent possibility that Peregrine is town), Peregrine's claim shouldn't make a difference. However, if Cakez is scum, he might be able to adjust his claim based on Peregrine's.

-smart

Nah, my role is extremely obvious town

MagnaofIllusion · Post Post #2355 (ISO) » Mon Sep 05, 2016 10:27 am

In post 2354, SirCakez wrote:Because my role will become basically useless if claimed

In post 2354, SirCakez wrote:Nah, my role is extremely obvious town

I can't say that I'm a fan of you softing a claim that's supposedly obv-Town but will be useless if fully claimed ....

farside22 · Post Post #2356 (ISO) » Mon Sep 05, 2016 10:27 am

In post 2344, Wisdom wrote:who cares what Peregrine claims if Cakez's result is believable and damning enough?

In post 2345, Wisdom wrote:Besides, it's not like Peregrine doesn't know there's a result on him already

So you will lynch Pere regardless what he claims?

I kuroi scum. How are you.
No I didn't forget about you but if you were paying attention at all day 2 I voted peregrine at the end of the day and stated I believed he was scum with the way the max wagon was going.
Good luck trying to save your scum buddy Pere.
Xoxo xoxo farside.

ISO · Post Post #2357 (ISO) » Mon Sep 05, 2016 10:29 am

In post 2355, MagnaofIllusion wrote:
In post 2354, SirCakez wrote:Because my role will become basically useless if claimed

In post 2354, SirCakez wrote:Nah, my role is extremely obvious town
I can't say that I'm a fan of you softing a claim that's supposedly obv-Town but will be useless if fully claimed ....

I don't understand what you're getting at?

farside22 · Post Post #2358 (ISO) » Mon Sep 05, 2016 10:30 am

In post 2355, MagnaofIllusion wrote:
In post 2354, SirCakez wrote:Because my role will become basically useless if claimed

In post 2354, SirCakez wrote:Nah, my role is extremely obvious town
I can't say that I'm a fan of you softing a claim that's supposedly obv-Town but will be useless if fully claimed ....

Why do I get the impression people care more about sir Cakez claim then Pere scum.
Nice that Pere gets to do lurks a lot play with barely a push from some people.

KuroiXHF · Post Post #2359 (ISO) » Mon Sep 05, 2016 10:30 am

I didn't read anything about 85, but I did see (almost 100%). What would make sense to me is if he was a tracker or a watcher, and saw something incriminating related to Ank's death.

Also, with Mollie, what doesn't make sense is her claiming when there's no indication that she's about to lynch. If she's a bodyguard, there's no reason to claim. A town bodyguard does NOT want scum to know that they're a bodyguard.

PREVIEW EDIT: STOP FUCKING POSTING SO I CAN GET A POST IN.
Thank you.
<3

farside22 · Post Post #2360 (ISO) » Mon Sep 05, 2016 10:31 am

In post 2357, SirCakez wrote:
In post 2355, MagnaofIllusion wrote:
In post 2354, SirCakez wrote:Because my role will become basically useless if claimed

In post 2354, SirCakez wrote:Nah, my role is extremely obvious town
I can't say that I'm a fan of you softing a claim that's supposedly obv-Town but will be useless if fully claimed ....
I don't understand what you're getting at?

Basically you soft claimed.
He can't see why a full claim makes the ability useless.

farside22 · Post Post #2361 (ISO) » Mon Sep 05, 2016 10:32 am

In post 2359, KuroiXHF wrote:I didn't read anything about 85, but I did see (almost 100%). What would make sense to me is if he was a tracker or a watcher, and saw something incriminating related to Ank's death.

Also, with Mollie, what doesn't make sense is her claiming when there's no indication that she's about to lynch. If she's a bodyguard, there's no reason to claim. A town bodyguard does NOT want scum to know that they're a bodyguard.

PREVIEW EDIT: STOP FUCKING POSTING SO I CAN GET A POST IN.
Thank you.
<3

That's hysterical.
I wonder how many people said they'd lynch mollie today if something didn't happen.

MagnaofIllusion · Post Post #2362 (ISO) » Mon Sep 05, 2016 10:37 am

In post 2358, farside22 wrote:Why do I get the impression people care more about sir Cakez claim then Pere scum.
Nice that Pere gets to do lurks a lot play with barely a push from some people.

Why exactly do you post this Farside? Total serious question.

Because Pere's complete absence from the thread means any questions or pressure directed at him are pointless until he returns. You have to understand this. And as I've now pointed out multiple times the only reason I haven't vote him is that I don't want the Day ending before my V/LA ends so I can dig into multiple things I've pointed out (like, for example, wanting to dig into the push on Ank yesterday).

So aside from light shade throwing I don't get the purpose of your post. Should SirCakez be off-limits as far as examining and commenting on his soft-claim? What's my takeaway?

Wisdom · Post Post #2363 (ISO) » Mon Sep 05, 2016 10:43 am

In post 2359, KuroiXHF wrote:Also, with Mollie, what doesn't make sense is her claiming when there's no indication that she's about to lynch. If she's a bodyguard, there's no reason to claim. A town bodyguard does NOT want scum to know that they're a bodyguard.

She has been pushed since D1 to claim what her selfresolving thing is, this makes no sense

KuroiXHF · Post Post #2364 (ISO) » Mon Sep 05, 2016 10:46 am

In post 2363, Wisdom wrote:
In post 2359, KuroiXHF wrote:Also, with Mollie, what doesn't make sense is her claiming when there's no indication that she's about to lynch. If she's a bodyguard, there's no reason to claim. A town bodyguard does NOT want scum to know that they're a bodyguard.
She has been pushed since D1 to claim what her selfresolving thing is, this makes no sense

I agree. It makes no sense for her to claim now. Despite all that, there are still no votes for her.

This is all so fabricated it nearly makes me nauseated.

Young and Witless · Post Post #2365 (ISO) » Mon Sep 05, 2016 10:46 am

In post 2359, KuroiXHF wrote:Also, with Mollie, what doesn't make sense is her claiming when there's no indication that she's about to lynch. If she's a bodyguard, there's no reason to claim. A town bodyguard does NOT want scum to know that they're a bodyguard.

this is completely bass-ackward...
-smart

KuroiXHF · Post Post #2366 (ISO) » Mon Sep 05, 2016 10:49 am

In post 2365, Young and Witless wrote:
In post 2359, KuroiXHF wrote:Also, with Mollie, what doesn't make sense is her claiming when there's no indication that she's about to lynch. If she's a bodyguard, there's no reason to claim. A town bodyguard does NOT want scum to know that they're a bodyguard.
this is completely bass-ackward...
-smart

How?

ISO · Post Post #2367 (ISO) » Mon Sep 05, 2016 10:50 am

In post 2360, farside22 wrote:
In post 2357, SirCakez wrote:
In post 2355, MagnaofIllusion wrote:
In post 2354, SirCakez wrote:Because my role will become basically useless if claimed

In post 2354, SirCakez wrote:Nah, my role is extremely obvious town
I can't say that I'm a fan of you softing a claim that's supposedly obv-Town but will be useless if fully claimed ....
I don't understand what you're getting at?
Basically you soft claimed.
He can't see why a full claim makes the ability useless.

Because right now my softclaim isn't giving anything away to the scumz
If the scum know what my role is then it will be mostly useless (at least from what I'm predicting)

Seems clear

Wisdom · Post Post #2368 (ISO) » Mon Sep 05, 2016 10:50 am

In post 2364, KuroiXHF wrote:I agree. It makes no sense for her to claim now. Despite all that, there are still no votes for her.

This is all so fabricated it nearly makes me nauseated.

you make no sense. Should I start thinking you're doing it on purpose again?

KuroiXHF · Post Post #2369 (ISO) » Mon Sep 05, 2016 10:53 am

In post 2368, Wisdom wrote:
In post 2364, KuroiXHF wrote:I agree. It makes no sense for her to claim now. Despite all that, there are still no votes for her.

This is all so fabricated it nearly makes me nauseated.
you make no sense. Should I start thinking you're doing it on purpose again?

This sounds like a threat, and I'm not going to be forced to believe what you want me to believe.
And I'm not sure I town read you anymore.

Like I said, if there are no votes on her, she's not being pressured.
I don't see ANY town motivation for this.

Dwlee99 · Post Post #2370 (ISO) » Mon Sep 05, 2016 10:55 am

I didn't read the game lol

KuroiXHF · Post Post #2371 (ISO) » Mon Sep 05, 2016 10:55 am

In post 2370, Dwlee99 wrote:I didn't read the game lol

You might want to.
It's kind of important.

MagnaofIllusion · Post Post #2372 (ISO) » Mon Sep 05, 2016 10:57 am

In post 2370, Dwlee99 wrote:I didn't read the game lol

Look, scum!

MagnaofIllusion · Post Post #2373 (ISO) » Mon Sep 05, 2016 11:00 am

In post 2367, SirCakez wrote:Because right now my softclaim isn't giving anything away to the scumz
If the scum know what my role is then it will be mostly useless (at least from what I'm predicting)

Seems clear

The big threat that makes roles useless vis-a-vie scum interference is the possibility of a blocking role.

The manner in which you soft-claimed today does nothing to insulate you from that.

So you might be postulating some weird edge-case but that's unknowable to people not-you from the information we have.

Color me not impressed with the logic employed here.

Wisdom · Post Post #2374 (ISO) » Mon Sep 05, 2016 11:00 am

In post 2369, KuroiXHF wrote: Like I said, if there are no votes on her, she's not being pressured.
I don't see ANY town motivation for this.

She is being pressured to explain what her "self-resolving" claim is for 3 days now, including today. Arguing the claim came from nowhere is ridiculous. We asked her for it repeatedly.