In post 1265, Wisdom wrote:[quote="In [ur
in this game that ended today he claimed scum in his opening post and quickhammered two wagons
so yeah, you dont have a point
Its amazing how little this has to with my post.
lol wat?
You said NM wouldnt jump on your wagon with no reads because he wouldnt want to attract negative attention
I showed you he did far worse things
Like I kinda didn't really want to say anything but each time people like Jason and Vecna and Synik get and their scum reads consist of mostly 3 players it makes me think that that they are hunting the other team b/c 3 scum in a 21 player is wrong and 2 3 man teams is more than plausible I think.
Its a crazy tinfoil and I'm maybe prob wrong but both Synik and Basic are scummy and kraska thinking Basic is pocketing. MB explains all this.
Of all tyrannies,a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end they do so with the approval of their own conscience.
In post 1276, Nero Cain wrote:Like I kinda didn't really want to say anything but each time people like Jason and Vecna and Synik get and their scum reads consist of mostly 3 players it makes me think that that they are hunting the other team b/c 3 scum in a 21 player is wrong and 2 3 man teams is more than plausible I think.
Its a crazy tinfoil and I'm maybe prob wrong but both Synik and Basic are scummy and kraska thinking Basic is pocketing. MB explains all this.
like, other than me there is nobody who is hunting for the whole scumteam
people are giving 1-2-3 scumreads
arguing that somehow means multiball is just bad
Yeah
Feels like adapting his play
Like Nero talks about change in tone and fails to notice this...It's weird
I think there are notable differences in synik's posting after he got called out on being too unnaturally passive to the situation he's in
In post 1237, Ankamius wrote:Cakez, this conversation is over. The first point is shit I've gone over multiple times and I'm not going to budge in believing that the meta being used here is garbage.
The wow is all you're going to get as a response to your other point. A single look at the entire string of posts will make it glaringly obvious why I'm not going to bother engaging it.
OK, sorry you're getting frustrated that we're lynching your buddy.
In post 1281, Wisdom wrote:like, other than me there is nobody who is hunting for the whole scumteam
people are giving 1-2-3 scumreads
arguing that somehow means multiball is just bad
In post 1265, Wisdom wrote:[quote="In [ur
in this game that ended today he claimed scum in his opening post and quickhammered two wagons
so yeah, you dont have a point
Its amazing how little this has to with my post.
lol wat?
You said NM wouldnt jump on your wagon with no reads because he wouldnt want to attract negative attention
I showed you he did far worse things
You showed me N_M claiming scum and then playing it off as a name joke. And then for the rest of the game he posted as if he was hypothetically scum. He's drawing attention to himself on purpose in an absurd way.
Joining a wagon that you claim to not be scum reading draws attention to your reads, and whether or not you have any and if they're consistent.
They're absolutely fundamentally different actions.
Like I doubt I'm even right but if you you simply disagreed why would you call it bullshit?
Of all tyrannies,a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end they do so with the approval of their own conscience.
kraska: i would have to look for that when i'm not phoneposting. i didn't ISO you two together. i also want to hear what Nero thinks about that.
i'm going to stop signing. Almost and i don't sound like each other, and he isn't even here. :>
In post 1281, Wisdom wrote:like, other than me there is nobody who is hunting for the whole scumteam
people are giving 1-2-3 scumreads
arguing that somehow means multiball is just bad
In post 1282, kraska77 wrote:Like Nero talks about change in tone and fails to notice this...It's weird
What?
Of all tyrannies,a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end they do so with the approval of their own conscience.
In post 1276, Nero Cain wrote:Like I kinda didn't really want to say anything but each time people like Jason and Vecna and Synik get and their scum reads consist of mostly 3 players it makes me think that that they are hunting the other team b/c 3 scum in a 21 player is wrong and 2 3 man teams is more than plausible I think.
Its a crazy tinfoil and I'm maybe prob wrong but both Synik and Basic are scummy and kraska thinking Basic is pocketing. MB explains all this.
In post 1265, Wisdom wrote:[quote="In [ur
in this game that ended today he claimed scum in his opening post and quickhammered two wagons
so yeah, you dont have a point
Its amazing how little this has to with my post.
lol wat?
You said NM wouldnt jump on your wagon with no reads because he wouldnt want to attract negative attention
I showed you he did far worse things
You showed me N_M claiming scum and then playing it off as a name joke. And then for the rest of the game he posted as if he was hypothetically scum. He's drawing attention to himself on purpose in an absurd way.
Joining a wagon that you claim to not be scum reading draws attention to your reads, and whether or not you have any and if they're consistent.
They're absolutely fundamentally different actions.
that makes no sense
And youre ignoring that he also quickhammered two wagons
He doesnt care about how he appears.
Like I doubt I'm even right but if you you simply disagreed why would you call it bullshit?
because I feel like you contradicted yourself and you're using multiball to cover it
You are pushing Synik as scum yet you're also saying that Basic is scum for WKing Synik
Was it Bro that said Wisdom is town unless this is MB? I speculate that its MB and Wisdom starts charging after me. lol
Wouldn't it be funny if I was right about it being MB and that's why Wisdom is all pissed off.
Of all tyrannies,a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end they do so with the approval of their own conscience.
In post 1265, Wisdom wrote:[quote="In [ur
in this game that ended today he claimed scum in his opening post and quickhammered two wagons
so yeah, you dont have a point
Its amazing how little this has to with my post.
lol wat?
You said NM wouldnt jump on your wagon with no reads because he wouldnt want to attract negative attention
I showed you he did far worse things
You showed me N_M claiming scum and then playing it off as a name joke. And then for the rest of the game he posted as if he was hypothetically scum. He's drawing attention to himself on purpose in an absurd way.
Joining a wagon that you claim to not be scum reading draws attention to your reads, and whether or not you have any and if they're consistent.
They're absolutely fundamentally different actions.
that makes no sense
And youre ignoring that he also quickhammered two wagons
He doesnt care about how he appears.
You brought up THIS GAME, that N_M was likely to randomly hammer wagons.
If that's something he's known for of course he didn't care about doing it.
Like I doubt I'm even right but if you you simply disagreed why would you call it bullshit?
because I feel like you contradicted yourself and you're using multiball to cover it
You are pushing Synik as scum yet you're also saying that Basic is scum for WKing Synik
I'm saying that Basic is scummy and I don't know what the dynamic is. How could I?
Of all tyrannies,a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end they do so with the approval of their own conscience.
I resonate with the worrying about mb is bs sentiment
Aren't u a self proclaimed occam razor fan
Don't worry about complex logistics now, if you find synik/basic interactions weird then only one of them is scum