You know, you should probably explain votes when posting them, that way people don't fos you for not explaining your reads.
#mafiascumtips
In post 1841, Gamma Emerald wrote:By the way I'm probably not going to look through them, just wanted to ensure you were giving all the information.
lel that's totally explains why you're still pushing the snarky lynch thenIn post 1845, Sondam wrote:If Snarky plays the same regardless of what side he's on wouldn't the point your bringing up be moot?
Also you're right a snarky lynch gives us less info compared to a jason lynch (thanks for saying what I already said early on cakez good to see you're still stealing peoples ideas!)
But Jason isn't scummy
btw my hydra partner is a lurking asshole jsyk
~M
Why didn't you like his vote? What made you not like his vote? Was it the vote itself? The way he presented it? The tone of the way he voted? The timing of him voting the vote?In post 1854, Not_Mafia wrote:I didn't like his vote
Second sentence of urs was overly defensive and just wrong.In post 1838, Almost Chara wrote:Because that's what I think I caught. If I thought I caught Mafia you probably would have accused me of being obssessed with Mafia over the SK.In post 1820, I Am Innocent wrote:Why so obsessed about the SK?In post 1818, Almost Chara wrote:1- Because a Snarky lynch is an easy/lazy lynch at this point.In post 1814, Basic wrote:Why not lynch Snarky today and examine things based off the flip?
2- Because a Snarky lynch is MUCH less likely to give us any more info as he practically made no linking with anyone.
Snarky flips scum = we're still clueless whom to go for next. Snarky flips town = we made a mistake, but he didn't put much effort so disregard everything he did/said and let's start from scratch.
The only thing good about an SS lynch would be if he flipped precisely the SK, which I'm totally excluding for now as I do have a strong gut feeling JW will flip SK.
~A50
Flipping the SK also serves to clarify a LOT, because it makes it less likely we have 2 scum teams (it's already a very low probability, but a flipped SK makes it almost NULL a probability), which will help clarify some points (like people who are legit scum hunting must be town and not another scum team).
~A50
Are you reading or are you just picking at me??In post 1857, I Am Innocent wrote:Second sentence of urs was overly defensive and just wrong.In post 1838, Almost Chara wrote:Because that's what I think I caught. If I thought I caught Mafia you probably would have accused me of being obssessed with Mafia over the SK.In post 1820, I Am Innocent wrote:Why so obsessed about the SK?In post 1818, Almost Chara wrote:1- Because a Snarky lynch is an easy/lazy lynch at this point.In post 1814, Basic wrote:Why not lynch Snarky today and examine things based off the flip?
2- Because a Snarky lynch is MUCH less likely to give us any more info as he practically made no linking with anyone.
Snarky flips scum = we're still clueless whom to go for next. Snarky flips town = we made a mistake, but he didn't put much effort so disregard everything he did/said and let's start from scratch.
The only thing good about an SS lynch would be if he flipped precisely the SK, which I'm totally excluding for now as I do have a strong gut feeling JW will flip SK.
~A50
Flipping the SK also serves to clarify a LOT, because it makes it less likely we have 2 scum teams (it's already a very low probability, but a flipped SK makes it almost NULL a probability), which will help clarify some points (like people who are legit scum hunting must be town and not another scum team).
~A50
The reason I bring it up is because scum are often more concerned with the SK while town is more concerned with scum.
And who are you referring to when you say you caught SK? Jason? Then why say "the only thing good about an SS lynch would be if he flipped precisely the SK"
Why wouldn't it be good if snarky flipped scum?
See why I think ur worried a bit much about the SK???
In post 1677, Almost Chara wrote:Hey, Jason: Read the above quote, mate. Doesn't that imply you thought Synik was "likely" lying? In miy mind SK unlikely = FBI Agent unlikely = Synik likely lying = Synik likely Scum. Please correct me if I'm wrong.In post 1559, JasonWazza wrote:And personally with the knowledge i have of the show, i feel an SK existing to be fairly unlikely
How would they know he was serial killer?In post 1864, Nero Cain wrote:What if Synik is the SK and fake claimed FBI agent? I guess it would help explain why Basic and others were hard defending that.
¿¿¿???In post 1864, Nero Cain wrote:What if Synik is the SK and fake claimed FBI agent? I guess it would help explain why Basic and others were hard defending that.
He already said that.In post 1860, Almost Chara wrote:Mate, I love how you're ignoring discussions and just selectively responding to certain stuff.
Reminder:
In post 1677, Almost Chara wrote:Hey, Jason: Read the above quote, mate. Doesn't that imply you thought Synik was "likely" lying? In miy mind SK unlikely = FBI Agent unlikely = Synik likely lying = Synik likely Scum. Please correct me if I'm wrong.In post 1559, JasonWazza wrote:And personally with the knowledge i have of the show, i feel an SK existing to be fairly unlikely
Any comments on this?
~A50
How is that a reach? Scum defend town/not thier team scum all the time.In post 1869, Harkonnen97 wrote:you are reaching hard
this post is terrible. later you retract it, but right here you were throwing shade on the people defending Synik for "defending a SK"In post 1864, Nero Cain wrote:What if Synik is the SK and fake claimed FBI agent? I guess it would help explain why Basic and others were hard defending that.