In post 56, Parama wrote:
in what context is pointing out a thing i didn't like but had reason to not vote for (see: follow-up post) fence-sitting?
if they are completely different things given context (like you're claiming) then why did you call eager a hypocrite anyways?
this is a response to the first two questions.
what i read: rhetorical questions that implied you thought the context surrounding eager's post was different than mine.
which you confirmed by following up that you thought i was fence-sitting and he was just foot-in-mouth.
it should be clear that i did not find the context different enough to make a difference.
but that you called him a hypocrite makes it seem like you also didn't find the context different enough.
i know you've explained it like five times but i still have no bloody clue what the greyice question is asking.
In post 52, farside22 wrote:My question about grey was again to see if Parama thought grey was doing anything or had a view there on just her blanket comments.
like seriously, what is this? i'd love to answer your question, but i just have no clue what it is.
for the record: you literally just dodged my question, again.
again,
In post 233, Parama wrote:
yes. she's guilty of practically everything she's accusing me of
i could probably continue to argue with you using quotes of stuff i've already said in-thread, because kraska is pretty on point that you're just repeating the same stuff over and over, why even bother with the pretense.
let's have a quote-off farside. i'm ready.