Mini 1834: Biker Wars: Blood in the Streets (Game over!)

[Parama]

Farside/Snake/CKD scumteam
EZ
Farside's argument with Parama looks awful, and 556 is pretty convincing
Gear your GreyIce vote sucks

this is rancid garbage. eager's interactions with farside don't make sense as scum. she's trying to buddy the hell out of him and he's not dumb enough to fall for it.
also i don't see where ckd factors into anything here

567 is fine even if ut shouldn't be dismissing my post like that

the more people constantly dismiss farside's play the more i believe in my scumread tbh

[StrangerCoug]

VOTE COUNT

eagerSnake (1): SirCakez
GreyICE (1): Gear
farside22 (2): GreyICE, Parama
kuribo (1): kraska77
SirCakes (4): curiouskarmadog, Untrod Tripod, farside22, eagerSnake
Not voting (4): kuribo, RachMarie, SnarkySnowman, Aristophanes

Day 1 ends in (expired on 2016-10-10 13:18:51).

Mod: fix quote please

Done.

And I'm going on v/LA for 48 hours

Noted.

VOTE: SirCakez

I have you as already voting SirCakes.

[eagerSnake]

I have you as already voting SirCakes.

Oh I thought I switched to Farside a few pages back.

[eagerSnake]

VOTE: Farside22

[kraska77]

UNVOTE:

[StrangerCoug]

VOTE: Farside22

Missed it. Sorry. Fortunately, I just had to correct your position on the most recent one.

[eagerSnake]

No harm no foul.

[StrangerCoug]

Snarky Snowman and Aristophanes are due to be prodded in (expired on 2016-09-29 18:54:14) and (expired on 2016-09-29 15:45:01) respectively.

[Aristophanes]

Imagine a very tongue in cheek person in your life and that would describe my posting style.
Sarcasm
Annoyance
Quick post with many interruption.
Fierce
All in a sense of cynicism for other.
Thinking I'm right and above all bitchy.

This sounds like a bunch of reasons I like you and have a great time playing with you here.

Also not at all like lynch bait.

(I'm reading up. Many posts appeared)

[Aristophanes]

I was almost in prod range? Whoops!

Inb4 being Beetlejuiced

[kraska77]

In post 450, farside22 wrote:
Imagine a very tongue in cheek person in your life and that would describe my posting style.
Sarcasm
Annoyance
Quick post with many interruption.
Fierce
All in a sense of cynicism for other.
Thinking I'm right and above all bitchy.
This sounds like a bunch of reasons I like you and have a great time playing with you here.

Same ^_^ ure not annoying or bitchy farfar

[Aristophanes]

GreyICE is extremely town. This is wonderful, as my last game with him he was very hard to lynch despite our

best

efforts.

[SnarkySnowman]

I will not be prodded.

[Parama]

I will not be prodded.

yeah but you also need to, y'know,

do anything at all

[Parama]

like dude you freakin' modded the undertale game you should know full well i don't let anyone get away with the kind of crap you're trying to pull here

[eagerSnake]

Yeah I'm about to get ruthless on these lurkers

[GreyICE]

I'm not addressing snarky being useless until day 2. When I know for a fact we don't have a vig. Vig should evaporate sparky like s bad dream.

[eagerSnake]

If you HAVE to lynch some eventually, you might as well do it sooner than later.

[eagerSnake]

Let me make a theoretical tangent here. Some players adopt a consistently scummy playstyle so that people can't read them when they're scum. If you don't lynch them eventually, they'll just win if they're scum; and if you have to lynch someone eventually it's better to do that early rather than late. In theory it might be a good idea to keep a good scumhunter around, but in practice good scumhunters never fall into this category.

Thus, I follow this rule: Any player who is playing in a way deliberately designed to obscure scumtells should be lynched immediately, regardless of meta.

tl;dr: Yes you should lynch people who are obfuscating, even if they're within meta.

[Gear]

GreyICE is extremely town.

Share your reasons with me, and I'll love you forever.

[Aristophanes]

wanna answer my question now?

Hey parama: I'm still waiting for you to explain the point of these questions.

pedit: so questions only matter now if they're alignment-indicative.
how do you define that?

where
did
you
answer
this
question

point to it.
right this instant.

But this question is useless.

[Parama]

h o w

I literally already explained why that question is important

[Aristophanes]

@everyone hard read the past 4-5 pages, it's not drivel

I did.
It's, to use a new term, "circle jerking" and I don't think anyone got anything out of it, including those involved.

[Parama]

last part of 507

too much of a pain to quote it on phone

[Parama]

@everyone hard read the past 4-5 pages, it's not drivel

I did.
It's, to use a new term, "circle jerking" and I don't think anyone got anything out of it, including those involved.

this is exactly the kind of dismissive attitude scum would love to take here. you don't have to weigh in on anything when you can just lump it all together like this