Mini 1837: Family Mafia (GAME OVER)

ISO · Post Post #100 (ISO) » Mon Oct 03, 2016 8:51 am

I mean like "too defensive" implies scumminess

gigabyteTroubadour · Post Post #101 (ISO) » Mon Oct 03, 2016 8:54 am

valid point

VOTE: Nacho

SpyreX · Post Post #102 (ISO) » Mon Oct 03, 2016 9:25 am

Oh if i lose my dream for damn votes on nacho i swear to god

House · Post Post #103 (ISO) » Mon Oct 03, 2016 9:26 am

In post 100, SirCakez wrote:I mean like "too defensive" implies scumminess

Or panicky town.

VOTE: Spicy

Fun wagons are fun.

gigabyteTroubadour · Post Post #104 (ISO) » Mon Oct 03, 2016 9:29 am

house, why did you change your vote from a serious one (I'm assuming, correct me if i'm wrong) back to a RVS vote?

If your vote on Nacho wasn't serious, why the vote hop in the first place?

(i still approve of the dwlee hydra policy lynch ftr but i wanna gamesolve too

)

House · Post Post #105 (ISO) » Mon Oct 03, 2016 9:30 am

In post 104, gigabyteTroubadour wrote:(I'm assuming, correct me if i'm wrong)

You're wrong.

gigabyteTroubadour · Post Post #106 (ISO) » Mon Oct 03, 2016 9:31 am

In post 104, gigabyteTroubadour wrote:If your vote on Nacho wasn't serious, why the vote hop in the first place?

House · Post Post #107 (ISO) » Mon Oct 03, 2016 9:31 am

In post 104, gigabyteTroubadour wrote:If your vote on Nacho wasn't serious, why the vote hop in the first place?

There's just as much justification for either wagon (0), so I don't see why it matters.

House · Post Post #108 (ISO) » Mon Oct 03, 2016 9:32 am

In post 106, gigabyteTroubadour wrote:
In post 104, gigabyteTroubadour wrote:If your vote on Nacho wasn't serious, why the vote hop in the first place?

Dammit Giggles give me thirty seconds!

gigabyteTroubadour · Post Post #109 (ISO) » Mon Oct 03, 2016 9:33 am

Wait, Cakeboy wasn't making a serious vote?

Cakeboy, is your vote serious?

also sorry i thought you'd respond in one post

House · Post Post #110 (ISO) » Mon Oct 03, 2016 9:34 am

In post 109, gigabyteTroubadour wrote:Wait, Cakeboy wasn't making a serious vote?

Cakeboy, is your vote serious?

also sorry i thought you'd respond in one post

Idk if he

thinks

he's serious, but he's clearly not.

House · Post Post #111 (ISO) » Mon Oct 03, 2016 9:35 am

In post 109, gigabyteTroubadour wrote:also sorry i thought you'd respond in one post

Hi select & quote to keep things simple on the phone.

SpyreX · Post Post #112 (ISO) » Mon Oct 03, 2016 9:36 am

I'm dead serious. Fun is serious business. And nothing makes me giggle like murdering hydras

Nachomamma8 · Post Post #113 (ISO) » Mon Oct 03, 2016 9:36 am

In post 68, kraska77 wrote:i mean really why am i and cakeboy priority to scrutinise?

I interpreted it more as "talk about these people" as opposed to "these are people that are priority sorts".

The rest of your answer is fair enough; I'd move onto something else, but I don't really have anything right this moment.

House · Post Post #114 (ISO) » Mon Oct 03, 2016 9:39 am

In post 68, kraska77 wrote:why am i and cakeboy priority to scrutinise?

In post 68, kraska77 wrote:im unfamiliar with majority of the playerlist and the majority of the playerlist is unfamiliar with me so like people obviously will need to interact with me longer to parse me compared to someone theyre more familiar with.

*ahem*

Nachomamma8 · Post Post #115 (ISO) » Mon Oct 03, 2016 9:40 am

In post 80, Papa Zito wrote:I'd like this wagon a lot more if the target was actually around.

You're missing the appeal of it, SpyreX.

ISO · Post Post #116 (ISO) » Mon Oct 03, 2016 9:44 am

In post 103, House wrote:
In post 100, SirCakez wrote:I mean like "too defensive" implies scumminess
Or panicky town.

VOTE: Spicy

Fun wagons are fun.

"too" is the key word
It's like if I said "too laid back" or "too lurky", that generally means scumreading

In post 109, gigabyteTroubadour wrote:Wait, Cakeboy wasn't making a serious vote?

Cakeboy, is your vote serious?

also sorry i thought you'd respond in one post

Yes it was serious

Nachomamma8 · Post Post #117 (ISO) » Mon Oct 03, 2016 9:46 am

In post 94, SirCakez wrote:Because it seems nacho is more interested in making kraska look like scum then actually finding scum
Camn is probably innocent because her posting is really loose. She's more uptight as scum.

There was not a place where I misrepresented kraska or made her look bad; the purpose of my questioning was not to "make her look bad", it was to figure out what she was driving at with her camn questioning.

The only place where she felt I misinterpreted her was when I said she was "worried", which I don't think was unreasonable or anywhere close to it, but feel free to disagree if you'd like. Why do you think Camn is town now (if it's just the uptight thing do you really think that not being uptight for one day is significant? could you give me an example of her being uptight as scum)? Why did you think she was scum before?

Nachomamma8 · Post Post #118 (ISO) » Mon Oct 03, 2016 9:56 am

In post 100, SirCakez wrote:I mean like "too defensive" implies scumminess

Too defensive implies odd behavior, which is worthy of questioning because either it's something I don't understand, something kraska isn't expressing well enough, or its kraska awkwardly faking something for some reason.

"Too defensive" is also something that I didn't say or imply; they're words that you put into my mouth... why, exactly?

SpicyJalapeñoKnocks · Post Post #119 (ISO) » Mon Oct 03, 2016 10:20 am

Is this the real life?
Is this just fantasy?
Caught in a landslide,
No escape from reality.
~Dwlee

SpyreX · Post Post #120 (ISO) » Mon Oct 03, 2016 10:21 am

There look it posted finish him

SpicyJalapeñoKnocks · Post Post #121 (ISO) » Mon Oct 03, 2016 10:23 am

Friends don't quicklynch friends
~Gendaberry

SpicyJalapeñoKnocks · Post Post #122 (ISO) » Mon Oct 03, 2016 10:24 am

In post 50, Nachomamma8 wrote:I have dreams of a game that, for once, doesn't devolve into absolute fuckery by page 5. I've seen scum lynched before they even posted, but rarely does it provide the satisfaction of hunting and catching that same scum and giving scum two free kills (and taking away the first kill's chance to claim) doesn't exactly light the fire in my heart.

oops too late
~Dwlee

SpyreX · Post Post #123 (ISO) » Mon Oct 03, 2016 10:37 am

So on a scale of 1-10 how much coordination did those two posts take.
I mean it can't be 1 afterall.

Papa Zito · Post Post #124 (ISO) » Mon Oct 03, 2016 10:43 am

yeah ofc then they go and do that and make me look stupid