Or I just got home from work and was playing catchup? You know, thigns that usually happen here in 'murica around 6PM EST (0000 CEST). Go take a look at any game I played before this time last year and you'll see a similar posting habit (unless I was underway at the time)
"I think I no longer believe in monsters as faces in the floor or feral infants or vampires or whatever. I think at seventeen now I believe the only real monsters might be the type of liar where there's simply no way to tell. The ones who give nothing away"
In post 67, GuiltyLion wrote:On first impression I doubt scum!gigabyte would openly encourage the Flames wagon along in 40, unless he has a history with Flames and Flames is usually mislynchable, but yeh page 2 reads
also if Flames flips scum then I'd say the wagon is very likely all-town
In post 67, GuiltyLion wrote:On first impression I doubt scum!gigabyte would openly encourage the Flames wagon along in 40, unless he has a history with Flames and Flames is usually mislynchable, but yeh page 2 reads
also if Flames flips scum then I'd say the wagon is very likely all-town
I disagree.
One of the first few voters could have RVS lol!voted for their scumpartner hoping to use it later for vote count analysis or whatever, and been dragged along for the ride without realizing it.
If there's scum on the wagon and Flames is scum, I'd say only for RyanK would this argument be plausible, and even then I'd still look into NJAC or Not_Mafia first.
If Flames is scum, his scumpartner certainly wouldn't be House or Maruchan. giga maaaybe, but they kept up with it in 40, and that post doesn't exactly leave them much room to back off later.
Like Jesus what are these terrible terrible posts?
Stop using gut as a reason to state someone is scum. Now.
If you want my meta click my wiki for a list of all my games. Warning: my meta changes.
Because I argue with people. It's what I do. Especially when they misrepresent me. My supervisor at work hates me and yells at me for arguing with him over stupid shit he does daily. Then HIS supervisor gets on him on the stupid shit he does.
do you think I am scummy for asking you that question?
"I think I no longer believe in monsters as faces in the floor or feral infants or vampires or whatever. I think at seventeen now I believe the only real monsters might be the type of liar where there's simply no way to tell. The ones who give nothing away"
do you think I am scummy for asking you that question?
not at all it's a valid question, as apparently a vast majority of the site players find my inclination to argue with people about my behavior scummy, and questioning scummy behavior is always good.
okay I think Maruchan is coming across townie here
@Maruchan - I doubt lynched scum would have claimed they were town. I mean this could just be WIFOM twilight trolling, but I think it'd be really disadvantageous for scum!Flames to twilight post as if he were town, because if he flips scum then I've indisputably townslipped
"I think I no longer believe in monsters as faces in the floor or feral infants or vampires or whatever. I think at seventeen now I believe the only real monsters might be the type of liar where there's simply no way to tell. The ones who give nothing away"
"I think I no longer believe in monsters as faces in the floor or feral infants or vampires or whatever. I think at seventeen now I believe the only real monsters might be the type of liar where there's simply no way to tell. The ones who give nothing away"
Hi my name is Guilty and I'm attempting to overanalyze everything so I can look like I'm doing something productive.
In post 85, GuiltyLion wrote:@Maruchan - I doubt lynched scum would have claimed they were town. I mean this could just be WIFOM twilight trolling, but I think it'd be really disadvantageous for scum!Flames to twilight post as if he were town, because if he flips scum then I've indisputably townslipped
Like dude really?
Stop using gut as a reason to state someone is scum. Now.
If you want my meta click my wiki for a list of all my games. Warning: my meta changes.
@House - His questions feel leading and his vote on Not_Mafia was in fact useless, even if he disagrees. The way he casually says "I don't like the wagon on Flames" without explaining why or pushing on people who voted Flames looks like scum WK-ing a mislynch.
"I think I no longer believe in monsters as faces in the floor or feral infants or vampires or whatever. I think at seventeen now I believe the only real monsters might be the type of liar where there's simply no way to tell. The ones who give nothing away"
like Not_Mafia is not a player who will alignment-tell based off of an RVS vote on him. The fact that NJAC tried to use "meta" to justify that as a reason to vote him doesn't make sense.
"I think I no longer believe in monsters as faces in the floor or feral infants or vampires or whatever. I think at seventeen now I believe the only real monsters might be the type of liar where there's simply no way to tell. The ones who give nothing away"
In post 92, GuiltyLion wrote:The way he casually says "I don't like the wagon on Flames" without explaining why or pushing on people who voted Flames looks like scum WK-ing a mislynch.
In post 40, gigabyteTroubadour wrote:Scum claiming ascetic is usually a terrible idea whether they are really ascetic or not
Why exactly is that a terrible idea in this setup?
These questions. "Why exactly" is just an altogether scummy phrase in general IMO.
Yes, I automatically start to suspect people who RVS vote when there's already wagons and discussion happening. Instead of taking a stance either way on Flames (or even RyanK, the possible counterwagon), NJAC just votes a slot that hasn't posted yet. It's safe and not-productive.
"I think I no longer believe in monsters as faces in the floor or feral infants or vampires or whatever. I think at seventeen now I believe the only real monsters might be the type of liar where there's simply no way to tell. The ones who give nothing away"
In post 93, GuiltyLion wrote:like Not_Mafia is not a player who will alignment-tell based off of an RVS vote on him. The fact that NJAC tried to use "meta" to justify that as a reason to vote him doesn't make sense.
Idk, I'd listen when experience speaks.
If he IS town, you might learn something. Worth seeking clarification before casting judgment at any rate.
In post 40, gigabyteTroubadour wrote:Scum claiming ascetic is usually a terrible idea whether they are really ascetic or not
Why exactly is that a terrible idea in this setup?
These questions. "Why exactly" is just an altogether scummy phrase in general IMO.
Yes, I automatically start to suspect people who RVS vote when there's already wagons and discussion happening. Instead of taking a stance either way on Flames (or even RyanK, the possible counterwagon), NJAC just votes a slot that hasn't posted yet. It's safe and not-productive.
"I think I no longer believe in monsters as faces in the floor or feral infants or vampires or whatever. I think at seventeen now I believe the only real monsters might be the type of liar where there's simply no way to tell. The ones who give nothing away"
