In post 321, House wrote:You were pushing NJAC for loopy shit, so I wanted to give you a tasty wagon to see if you'd latch on and continue your assault.
There was no way he was getting lynched, though.
I'm not going to get into any more mud-slinging with you. I hope the rest of the town can see for themselves the scumminess and monologic in this post (and the many, many of the others you have made).
If your name isn't House and you have questions and need further convincing then hit me up, but I'm not moving my vote today.
"I think I no longer believe in monsters as faces in the floor or feral infants or vampires or whatever. I think at seventeen now I believe the only real monsters might be the type of liar where there's simply no way to tell. The ones who give nothing away"
In post 323, GuiltyLion wrote:Further, there are other reasons why only claiming your result now that you had serious attention and vote pressure is not how a town cop plays.
In post 327, House wrote:Lol, typical scum maneuvering... Rage OMGUS once getting called out and pretend to ignore me.
Okay I know I just said I wouldn't respond, but I can't resist pointing this out - there's literally no rage in my posts. Further, I gave many legitimate reasons as to why you are obvious scum that have nothing to do with OMGUS. Just to recap:
1. When you started getting votes, you softed a valuable PR and also threw up AtE
2. You justified your vote on me with several misreps, particularly "you are clinging to ascetic" when that's bluntly not true. I traded my role already
3. You claiming to have a VT-result on NJAC is not reflected in your ISO from earlier today. It has scum motivation in both trying to save your ass and also creating WIFOM about NJAC's (the other primary scumspect) alignment.
"I think I no longer believe in monsters as faces in the floor or feral infants or vampires or whatever. I think at seventeen now I believe the only real monsters might be the type of liar where there's simply no way to tell. The ones who give nothing away"
and
4. "Why didn't you investigate [x]" and "Why did you keep your ascetic role" [which also, I had already explained] are not legitimate scum-hunting questions, they are busywork. This is the reason why I said a couple days ago that I found House's play to be vaguely scummy.
"I think I no longer believe in monsters as faces in the floor or feral infants or vampires or whatever. I think at seventeen now I believe the only real monsters might be the type of liar where there's simply no way to tell. The ones who give nothing away"
In post 328, GuiltyLion wrote:1. When you started getting votes, you softed a valuable PR and also threw up AtE
Something I do neither of as scum.
In post 328, GuiltyLion wrote:2. You justified your vote on me with several misreps, particularly "you are clinging to ascetic" when that's bluntly not true. I traded my role already
Something you hadn't claimed yet expected me to divine... how, exactly?
And you claim I'm the one misrepping? Hypocrite!
In post 328, GuiltyLion wrote:3. You claiming to have a VT-result on NJAC is not reflected in your ISO from earlier today. It has scum motivation in both trying to save your ass and also creating WIFOM about NJAC's (the other primary scumspect) alignment.
I play safe as hell when I'm scum. I don't gambit, and I go after soft targets.
This is my last post for tonight, I promise, I have other things to attend to
"I think I no longer believe in monsters as faces in the floor or feral infants or vampires or whatever. I think at seventeen now I believe the only real monsters might be the type of liar where there's simply no way to tell. The ones who give nothing away"
In post 329, GuiltyLion wrote:and
4. "Why didn't you investigate [x]" and "Why did you keep your ascetic role" [which also, I had already explained] are not legitimate scum-hunting questions, they are busywork. This is the reason why I said a couple days ago that I found House's play to be vaguely scummy.
My posts this morning are why you thought I was scummy DAYS AGO?
In post 328, GuiltyLion wrote:2. You justified your vote on me with several misreps, particularly "you are clinging to ascetic" when that's bluntly not true. I traded my role already
Something you hadn't claimed yet expected me to divine... how, exactly?
In post 327, House wrote:Lol, typical scum maneuvering... Rage OMGUS once getting called out and pretend to ignore me.
Okay I know I just said I wouldn't respond, but I can't resist pointing this out - there's literally no rage in my posts. Further, I gave many legitimate reasons as to why you are obvious scum that have nothing to do with OMGUS. Just to recap:
1. When you started getting votes, you softed a valuable PR and also threw up AtE
2. You justified your vote on me with several misreps, particularly "you are clinging to ascetic" when that's bluntly not true. I traded my role already
3. You claiming to have a VT-result on NJAC is not reflected in your ISO from earlier today. It has scum motivation in both trying to save your ass and also creating WIFOM about NJAC's (the other primary scumspect) alignment.
I don't think I can get a read on House, but I've read this over and 3) is the only point that I'm worried by.
1) is a towntell, 2) seems tenuous and I think House would do that as town
Otherwise, more sure you are town now. Not sure how to read NJAC.
In post 206, GuiltyLion wrote:I picked RyanK as he had one post, was on a mislynch wagon, and I figured if I got a VT result then I could play it slow and see who tried to push him and why
Neapolitan doesn't give alignment. Goons are vanilla too.
In post 206, GuiltyLion wrote:I picked RyanK as he had one post, was on a mislynch wagon, and I figured if I got a VT result then I could play it slow and see who tried to push him and why
Neapolitan doesn't give alignment. Goons are vanilla too.
This is a (pretty unfortunate) scumslip then.
Intent to check the VC before voting
Not really. I know what I got as my results. After I saw my results weren't what they were supposed to be, the mod admitted to an error.
In post 335, RyanK wrote:I actually have spotted that a long time ago. I've thought it might be playstyle. Since this have came up, I'll start an investigation. UNVOTE:
Again, please put your votes on a new lines, I almost missed this.
