Review of SAJ
142 - Worth coming back to if SAJ flips scum, but not scummy in itself.
210 - Reaching. He's comparing 2 different types of post (
208 and
209) and calling it scummy because they weren't treated the same.
212 - How is asking how strong a read is rolefishing? What's scummy about trying to work out someone's alignment? It's actually the opposite.
258 - Was way ott in backing down from his vote on MDS.
406 - Discounts bang's reason for scumreading him, saying he didn't have one and calls it ridiculous without even asking for the reason first.
414 - Says that FoD couldn't handle any pressure and cracked.
444 - Votes Gamma for what he might do, not what he'd already done. Says he's been sceptical of him all game but there's nothing in his posts to back this up. So it's effectively a blank vote, like the one he objected to bang making earlier.
533 - He ditches the Gamma vote as that's not going anywhere now, but doesn't know whether to push MDS or Spade.
The next few posts are him getting defensive when TT looks at him.
687 - His comment on Spade's
471 is reachy again. What does "but doesn't continue on making it seem like that was good enough to pass." even mean? He says that Spade doesn't even try to elaborate on why his actions were not scummy, but it's up to SAJ to prove they are if he thinks they are, not the other way around. He describes Spade's
552 as "just one big attack with erratic behaviour, a small blow up in my opinion. Very scummy to me.", which is not at all what I saw in it. Same with
669. Telling someone to replace out is bad.
![:]](./images/smilies/icon_smiling.png "Cheerful Smile"){kind=icon}
