there's literally no doubt it was a Gaster ability. just because it was a Gaster ability doesn't mean that ability was to create a new faction, necessarily. and whether Maxous was even aware of the full extent of it is also up in the air.In post 7847, MathBlade wrote: That is why those two posts confuse me so. It can't be both an ability and not one. Either there is or is not a new faction.
In post 7848, Not Chara wrote:it could be a part of the ability meant to mess with us, like the 1000 day deadline.
Accountant while I mentioned trolling as a possibility, both sides have to be analyzed.In post 7850, Not Chara wrote:there's literally no doubt it was a Gaster ability. just because it was a Gaster ability doesn't mean that ability was to create a new faction, necessarily. and whether Maxous was even aware of the full extent of it is also up in the air.In post 7847, MathBlade wrote: That is why those two posts confuse me so. It can't be both an ability and not one. Either there is or is not a new faction.
again: why is a perceived illogical argument grounds for voting me? where's the scum motivation?
? Did mod confirm it?In post 7850, Not Chara wrote:there's literally no doubt it was a Gaster ability.
I have been trying and failing to catch up prior to now. I am now keeping up since daystart, though I never really finished catching up on D5. The past is the past, and I'm assessing people on their actions at present, rather than the hidebound arguments past.In post 7808, Accountant wrote:VOTE: not chara
pine have you produced any content beyond asking us to lynch the mod
why?In post 7852, MathBlade wrote:It is more of a townie mindset and I don't see how a townie writes those posts.
no. but the alternative to it being caused by Gaster is that Skullduggery decided to do a bunch of strange Gasterish things after the Day 5 lynch and we justIn post 7853, Accountant wrote:? Did mod confirm it?In post 7850, Not Chara wrote:there's literally no doubt it was a Gaster ability.
It is more so that if you were Town I would not be theorizing about someone not receiving a part of their role PM. The bottom sentence suggesting Maxous creating a faction against his will doesn't jive with the top half of the PM. Furthermore you instead then make the vocal point Gaster instead of continually investigating or questioning Narna who immediately voted for you at the start of the day. It is like you aren't trying to interact and investigate but spill as much wine as possible before you believe you would be lynched.In post 7803, Ankamius wrote:In post 7785, Not Chara wrote:i doubt Maxous decided to try and trick us in death. so far, the Gaster messages have just been related to the Gaster ability activated, and i wouldn't think this latest one would be an exception.umone: Maxous would have been aware if his death created a faction he would win with. i didn't get the sense he was.
On the contrary. I am open to discussion including those that wish to lynch me. I think you are wrong and the fact you push me coinciding with things going on I find no coincidence.In post 7854, Pine wrote:I have been trying and failing to catch up prior to now. I am now keeping up since daystart, though I never really finished catching up on D5. The past is the past, and I'm assessing people on their actions at present, rather than the hidebound arguments past.In post 7808, Accountant wrote:VOTE: not chara
pine have you produced any content beyond asking us to lynch the mod
I kind of feel like discussing the Maxous issue without doing anything is useless. I'm kind of feeling a Mathblade lynch - everything I've seen has featured them stifling contrary discussion, which is why this thread is a barren wasteland of anything other than a couple of people running their mouths.
show meIn post 7854, Pine wrote:stifling contrary discussion
i asked Narna about his night results. he isn't here right now. how am i supposed to interact with him?In post 7857, MathBlade wrote:Furthermore you instead then make the vocal point Gaster instead of continually investigating or questioning Narna who immediately voted for you at the start of the day. It is like you aren't trying to interact and investigate but spill as much wine as possible before you believe you would be lynched.
the lack of concern would be because i know he doesn't have a guilty.In post 7862, MathBlade wrote:SirCakez on N2 who did you visit? I know super random can't find it in my notes here. So if you said it already sorry. Since you claimed roleblock I am assuming you visit people.
Not Chara -- I would be showing a bit more concern if a person who is a claimed psychologist votes you. You just asked for results. Very defeatist to me
why are we discounting the possibility of another role that has weird effects?In post 7856, Not Chara wrote:no. but the alternative to it being caused by Gaster is that Skullduggery decided to do a bunch of strange Gasterish things after the Day 5 lynch and we justIn post 7853, Accountant wrote:? Did mod confirm it?In post 7850, Not Chara wrote:there's literally no doubt it was a Gaster ability.happenedto lynch Gaster at the same time.
do you have an alternate explanation for it not being a passive (or even active, i'd allow for) Gaster ability?
Ahhhh OK. I thought you meant he was literally not the source of the messages.In post 7838, Nahdia wrote:I doubt Maxous was directly writing those messages. They were probably just pre-made messages that went off when certain abilities fire. The alternative is that whenever Maxous wanted to use an ability, he also had to literally type out a message he wanted to go along with it. Which is silly.
because of thisIn post 7841, Nahdia wrote:Iunno, maxous just doesn't seem like the kinda guy who would type the word "delightful". Or be super dramatic with the "MY FACTION." thing.
Night 2 I visited the Andrius slotIn post 7862, MathBlade wrote:SirCakez on N2 who did you visit? I know super random can't find it in my notes here. So if you said it already sorry. Since you claimed roleblock I am assuming you visit people.
Not Chara -- I would be showing a bit more concern if a person who is a claimed psychologist votes you. You just asked for results. Very defeatist to me
1) My result from n5In post 7867, Accountant wrote:1) why can't I kill?
2) when did math bring out the alcohol?
3) because I don't trust you.
What's your result?
However, it's looking pretty prompted while looking at it now. wewIn post 7788, MathBlade wrote:...First of allIn post 7781, SirCakez wrote:TBH if there was a culting Math makes sense as a target for it with their thread presence and generally being townread
1) I was not universally townread. Scum and one person I townread who I didn't before (Ank) were trying to mislynch me.
2) Even if I was universally townread -- Scum would be planning to use me as a mislynch anyway for the very thing you are suggesting.
Pretty much I know I am lynchbait because of the cult suggestion so I am trying to get out what reads I do have.