In post 614, lucca261 wrote:This quote by Huntress feels like once Sobolev had a good answer, she would've switched her vote to Loopdan. But if things didn't work out, she would be voting Fred.
Nope. That quote was me saying that I had been prepared to give Sobolev time as she had just replaced in, but that post 503 had confirmed my scumread on that slot.
In post 617, Loopdan wrote:I think scum thought ^those posts weree Sick saying he doc'd Soblev and that's why scum NK'd Sick.
How does this fit in with the lack of a kill night one? Because obviously Fred wasn't the target so scum would know that wasn't the case.
(11:04:10 PM) senspizzaline: That's actually my bold prediction for the year
(11:04:19 PM) senspizzaline: Miami finishes 2nd in the AFCE.
(11:05:35 PM) jhawk01b: my bold prediction for the year is that whoever wins the NFC West will have a winning record
In post 628, Raskolnikov wrote:This is stupid, a "50-50" read is an expression not a role crumb. Not from a new player like selynee anyways, if we're arguing that a newbie advance crumbed in their first game.
At the time I made the same mistake, though I thought it was a jailkeeper save, but now I know it's not true because it simply doesn't make sense with tracker.
I believe selynee misunderstood her role; the most likely is she had 3 scumreads, she tracked one of these and got a "no-result" but interpreted it as as innocent. Then in her remaining pool was me and another which is probably why she took a shot in the dark with that read.
Not so much a crumb, as using information she had. Why doesn't it make sense with a tracker? I think your last para is very unlikely.
In post 629, Raskolnikov wrote:Sickofit's play also doesn't match that. Taking one of selynee's few posts and equating it with sickofit's entire ISO is at best somewhat naive cherrypicking if it isn't being done out of malice. It's a very dangerous thing to boot.
(11:04:10 PM) senspizzaline: That's actually my bold prediction for the year
(11:04:19 PM) senspizzaline: Miami finishes 2nd in the AFCE.
(11:05:35 PM) jhawk01b: my bold prediction for the year is that whoever wins the NFC West will have a winning record
In post 667, TheBrie wrote:Also how long can I be V/LA without needing to be replaced?
I want to finish the game, but, starting in 4 hours, I might not be able to post till Friday.
If I haven't posted by Monday morning US time, you'll know I can't get on.
So ask me any questions you need now.
The length of time mods will allow for V/LA varies between mods but they usually allow up to a week. Send a PM to the mod to ask about this and set the V/LA flag on your user control panel.
In post 660, lucca261 wrote:Sicko thought Rasko was the doc. You can read the underlines on his posts. Observe that in no post Sicko tries to read Rasko. He thought 100% that Rasko was the PR, probably because of Rasko reaction to Selynee's vote on him.
I don't think you're the type of player to endgame yourself as scum or to troll post-lynch.
